Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model
People have a stronger preference for options encountered earlier or later in a sequence than for options in the middle of the sequence. To account for these primacy and recency effects, Mantonakis, Rodero, Lesschaeve, and Hastie (2009) sketched a sequential updating mechanism, the pairwise-competit...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00902/full |
id |
doaj-87e721f2dac14268bf079ca2dd31b203 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-87e721f2dac14268bf079ca2dd31b2032020-11-25T00:16:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-08-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0090299726Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition ModelEmina eCanic0Thorsten ePachur1University of WarwickMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentPeople have a stronger preference for options encountered earlier or later in a sequence than for options in the middle of the sequence. To account for these primacy and recency effects, Mantonakis, Rodero, Lesschaeve, and Hastie (2009) sketched a sequential updating mechanism, the pairwise-competition model. We propose a formal instantiation of the model and, using computer simulations, examine how the sizes of the predicted primacy and recency effects are affected by (a) variability in the quality of the options; (b) the number of options presented (sequence length); (c) the level of choice inertia (i.e., the tendency to stick with the current favorite); and (d) whether choice inertia dynamically increases over the sequence. We find that recency effects are reduced and primacy effects are increased with variability in quality as compared to without, and that this holds regardless of sequence length. A sizeable primacy effect occurs only with relatively short sequences or rather high levels of choice inertia. Dynamic inertia increases primacy effects and reduces recency effects, and the impact increases with higher inertia levels. We relate these results to empirical findings and derive novel predictions from the model.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00902/fullInertiaPrimacy and Recency EffectsSerial-Position EffectsSequential evaluationPreference construction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emina eCanic Thorsten ePachur |
spellingShingle |
Emina eCanic Thorsten ePachur Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model Frontiers in Psychology Inertia Primacy and Recency Effects Serial-Position Effects Sequential evaluation Preference construction |
author_facet |
Emina eCanic Thorsten ePachur |
author_sort |
Emina eCanic |
title |
Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model |
title_short |
Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model |
title_full |
Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model |
title_fullStr |
Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Serial-Position Effects in Preference Construction: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Pairwise-Competition Model |
title_sort |
serial-position effects in preference construction: a sensitivity analysis of the pairwise-competition model |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
People have a stronger preference for options encountered earlier or later in a sequence than for options in the middle of the sequence. To account for these primacy and recency effects, Mantonakis, Rodero, Lesschaeve, and Hastie (2009) sketched a sequential updating mechanism, the pairwise-competition model. We propose a formal instantiation of the model and, using computer simulations, examine how the sizes of the predicted primacy and recency effects are affected by (a) variability in the quality of the options; (b) the number of options presented (sequence length); (c) the level of choice inertia (i.e., the tendency to stick with the current favorite); and (d) whether choice inertia dynamically increases over the sequence. We find that recency effects are reduced and primacy effects are increased with variability in quality as compared to without, and that this holds regardless of sequence length. A sizeable primacy effect occurs only with relatively short sequences or rather high levels of choice inertia. Dynamic inertia increases primacy effects and reduces recency effects, and the impact increases with higher inertia levels. We relate these results to empirical findings and derive novel predictions from the model. |
topic |
Inertia Primacy and Recency Effects Serial-Position Effects Sequential evaluation Preference construction |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00902/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eminaecanic serialpositioneffectsinpreferenceconstructionasensitivityanalysisofthepairwisecompetitionmodel AT thorstenepachur serialpositioneffectsinpreferenceconstructionasensitivityanalysisofthepairwisecompetitionmodel |
_version_ |
1725382451942916096 |