NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department

Aim: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stine Engebretsen, Stig Tore Bogstrand, Dag Jacobsen, Valeria Vitelli, Rune Rimstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:Resuscitation Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520420300205
id doaj-87e1bbbe3f27453cb0bb0727883ce1f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87e1bbbe3f27453cb0bb0727883ce1f12021-03-19T07:30:26ZengElsevierResuscitation Plus2666-52042020-09-013100020NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency departmentStine Engebretsen0Stig Tore Bogstrand1Dag Jacobsen2Valeria Vitelli3Rune Rimstad4Emergency Department, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Postboks 1171 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway; Corresponding author. Emergency Department, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Acute Medicine, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Postboks 1171 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, NorwayOslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Postboks 1122 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, NorwayMedicine, Health, Patient Safety and Integration, Oslo University Hospital, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, NorwayAim: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘intensive care unit (ICU) admission’ and ‘critical care in ED’ and 2) comparing this for different NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system in use. Methods: Register-data on adult triage 1 and 2 patients with complete NEWS2 from 2015 and 2016 were retrieved. Prediction was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Associations were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results: 1586 patients were included. NEWS2 showed poor prediction of ‘mortality’ (AUC 0.686, CI 0.633–0.739) and adequate prediction of ‘ICU admission’ (AUC 0.716, CI 0.690–0.742) and ‘critical care in ED’ (AUC 0.756, CI 0.732–0.780). It was strongly associated with all outcomes (all p<0.001). All NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system showed poor prediction of all outcomes (all AUCs <0.7). The single-parameter system had the strongest association with ‘mortality’ (OR 1.688, CI 1.052–2.708, p<0.05) and ‘critical care in ED’ (OR 3.267, CI 2.490–4.286, p<0.001). NEWS2 > 4 had the strongest association with ‘ICU admission’ (OR 2.339, CI 1.742–3.141, p<0.001). Conclusion: For identification in order to trigger a response in the ED, outcomes closest in time seem most clinically relevant. As such, the single-parameter system had acceptable performance. NEWS2 > 4 should be considered as an additional trigger due to its association with ICU admission.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520420300205Emergency service, HospitalCritical careHospital rapid response teamEarly warning scoreInternal medicine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stine Engebretsen
Stig Tore Bogstrand
Dag Jacobsen
Valeria Vitelli
Rune Rimstad
spellingShingle Stine Engebretsen
Stig Tore Bogstrand
Dag Jacobsen
Valeria Vitelli
Rune Rimstad
NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
Resuscitation Plus
Emergency service, Hospital
Critical care
Hospital rapid response team
Early warning score
Internal medicine
author_facet Stine Engebretsen
Stig Tore Bogstrand
Dag Jacobsen
Valeria Vitelli
Rune Rimstad
author_sort Stine Engebretsen
title NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_short NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_full NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_fullStr NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed NEWS2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
title_sort news2 versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill medical patients in the emergency department
publisher Elsevier
series Resuscitation Plus
issn 2666-5204
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Aim: To test National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) versus a single-parameter system to identify critically ill general medical patients in the emergency department (ED), by 1) testing NEWS2s prediction of and association with primary outcome ‘mortality’ (hospital or 30 day) and secondary outcomes ‘intensive care unit (ICU) admission’ and ‘critical care in ED’ and 2) comparing this for different NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system in use. Methods: Register-data on adult triage 1 and 2 patients with complete NEWS2 from 2015 and 2016 were retrieved. Prediction was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Associations were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results: 1586 patients were included. NEWS2 showed poor prediction of ‘mortality’ (AUC 0.686, CI 0.633–0.739) and adequate prediction of ‘ICU admission’ (AUC 0.716, CI 0.690–0.742) and ‘critical care in ED’ (AUC 0.756, CI 0.732–0.780). It was strongly associated with all outcomes (all p<0.001). All NEWS2 cut-offs and the single-parameter system showed poor prediction of all outcomes (all AUCs <0.7). The single-parameter system had the strongest association with ‘mortality’ (OR 1.688, CI 1.052–2.708, p<0.05) and ‘critical care in ED’ (OR 3.267, CI 2.490–4.286, p<0.001). NEWS2 > 4 had the strongest association with ‘ICU admission’ (OR 2.339, CI 1.742–3.141, p<0.001). Conclusion: For identification in order to trigger a response in the ED, outcomes closest in time seem most clinically relevant. As such, the single-parameter system had acceptable performance. NEWS2 > 4 should be considered as an additional trigger due to its association with ICU admission.
topic Emergency service, Hospital
Critical care
Hospital rapid response team
Early warning score
Internal medicine
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520420300205
work_keys_str_mv AT stineengebretsen news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT stigtorebogstrand news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT dagjacobsen news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT valeriavitelli news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT runerimstad news2versusasingleparametersystemtoidentifycriticallyillmedicalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
_version_ 1724213215916720128