A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection

<p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been dev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. Burrows, R. J. Walters, D. Milledge, A. L. Densmore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-11-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf
id doaj-87be0748031d41ba9016cf0f90b16bd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87be0748031d41ba9016cf0f90b16bd02020-12-07T08:16:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812020-11-01203197321410.5194/nhess-20-3197-2020A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detectionK. Burrows0R. J. Walters1D. Milledge2A. L. Densmore3COMET, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UKCOMET, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UKSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UKDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK<p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been developed, but testing of these methods has been limited in each case to a single event and satellite sensor. Here we systematically test five methods using ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 data across four triggering earthquakes. The best-performing method was dependent on the satellite sensor. For three of our four case study events, an initial ALOS-2 image was acquired within 2 weeks, and with these data, co-event coherence loss (CECL) is the best-performing method. Using a single post-event Sentinel-1 image, the best-performing method was the boxcar–sibling (Bx–S) method. We also present three new methods which incorporate a second post-event image. While the waiting time for this second post-event image is disadvantageous for emergency response, these methods perform more consistently and on average 10&thinsp;% better across event and sensor type than the boxcar–sibling and CECL methods. Thus, our results demonstrate that useful landslide density information can be generated on the timescale of emergency response and allow us to make recommendations on the best method based on the availability and latency of post-event radar data.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K. Burrows
R. J. Walters
D. Milledge
A. L. Densmore
spellingShingle K. Burrows
R. J. Walters
D. Milledge
A. L. Densmore
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
author_facet K. Burrows
R. J. Walters
D. Milledge
A. L. Densmore
author_sort K. Burrows
title A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
title_short A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
title_full A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
title_fullStr A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
title_full_unstemmed A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
title_sort systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
publishDate 2020-11-01
description <p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been developed, but testing of these methods has been limited in each case to a single event and satellite sensor. Here we systematically test five methods using ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 data across four triggering earthquakes. The best-performing method was dependent on the satellite sensor. For three of our four case study events, an initial ALOS-2 image was acquired within 2 weeks, and with these data, co-event coherence loss (CECL) is the best-performing method. Using a single post-event Sentinel-1 image, the best-performing method was the boxcar–sibling (Bx–S) method. We also present three new methods which incorporate a second post-event image. While the waiting time for this second post-event image is disadvantageous for emergency response, these methods perform more consistently and on average 10&thinsp;% better across event and sensor type than the boxcar–sibling and CECL methods. Thus, our results demonstrate that useful landslide density information can be generated on the timescale of emergency response and allow us to make recommendations on the best method based on the availability and latency of post-event radar data.</p>
url https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kburrows asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT rjwalters asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT dmilledge asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT aldensmore asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT kburrows systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT rjwalters systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT dmilledge systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
AT aldensmore systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection
_version_ 1724397848948113408