A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection
<p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been dev...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-87be0748031d41ba9016cf0f90b16bd0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-87be0748031d41ba9016cf0f90b16bd02020-12-07T08:16:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812020-11-01203197321410.5194/nhess-20-3197-2020A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detectionK. Burrows0R. J. Walters1D. Milledge2A. L. Densmore3COMET, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UKCOMET, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UKSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UKDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK<p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been developed, but testing of these methods has been limited in each case to a single event and satellite sensor. Here we systematically test five methods using ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 data across four triggering earthquakes. The best-performing method was dependent on the satellite sensor. For three of our four case study events, an initial ALOS-2 image was acquired within 2 weeks, and with these data, co-event coherence loss (CECL) is the best-performing method. Using a single post-event Sentinel-1 image, the best-performing method was the boxcar–sibling (Bx–S) method. We also present three new methods which incorporate a second post-event image. While the waiting time for this second post-event image is disadvantageous for emergency response, these methods perform more consistently and on average 10 % better across event and sensor type than the boxcar–sibling and CECL methods. Thus, our results demonstrate that useful landslide density information can be generated on the timescale of emergency response and allow us to make recommendations on the best method based on the availability and latency of post-event radar data.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
K. Burrows R. J. Walters D. Milledge A. L. Densmore |
spellingShingle |
K. Burrows R. J. Walters D. Milledge A. L. Densmore A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
author_facet |
K. Burrows R. J. Walters D. Milledge A. L. Densmore |
author_sort |
K. Burrows |
title |
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
title_short |
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
title_full |
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
title_fullStr |
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
title_sort |
systematic exploration of satellite radar coherence methods for rapid landslide detection |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
issn |
1561-8633 1684-9981 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
<p>Emergency responders require information on the distribution of triggered landslides within 2 weeks of an earthquake or storm. Useable satellite radar imagery is acquired within days of any such event worldwide. Recently, several landslide detection methods that use these data have been developed, but testing of these methods has been limited in each case to a single event and satellite sensor. Here we systematically test five methods using ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 data across four triggering earthquakes. The best-performing method was dependent on the satellite sensor. For three of our four case study events, an initial ALOS-2 image was acquired within 2 weeks, and with these data, co-event coherence loss (CECL) is the best-performing method. Using a single post-event Sentinel-1 image, the best-performing method was the boxcar–sibling (Bx–S) method. We also present three new methods which incorporate a second post-event image. While the waiting time for this second post-event image is disadvantageous for emergency response, these methods perform more consistently and on average 10 % better across event and sensor type than the boxcar–sibling and CECL methods. Thus, our results demonstrate that useful landslide density information can be generated on the timescale of emergency response and allow us to make recommendations on the best method based on the availability and latency of post-event radar data.</p> |
url |
https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/3197/2020/nhess-20-3197-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kburrows asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT rjwalters asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT dmilledge asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT aldensmore asystematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT kburrows systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT rjwalters systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT dmilledge systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection AT aldensmore systematicexplorationofsatelliteradarcoherencemethodsforrapidlandslidedetection |
_version_ |
1724397848948113408 |