Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats

The obesity epidemic is driving interest in identifying strategies that enhance appetite control by altering the secretion of hormones that regulate satiety and food intake. An appropriate nutrient stimulus, such as a meal or oral nutrient solution, is needed to elicit the secretion of satiety hormo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danielle T. Vannan, Marc R. Bomhof, Raylene A. Reimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2018.00089/full
id doaj-87ae304a69d64d17962e3e5c21959a9c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87ae304a69d64d17962e3e5c21959a9c2020-11-25T01:08:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Nutrition2296-861X2018-09-01510.3389/fnut.2018.00089412140Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in RatsDanielle T. Vannan0Marc R. Bomhof1Raylene A. Reimer2Raylene A. Reimer3Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, CanadaFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaThe obesity epidemic is driving interest in identifying strategies that enhance appetite control by altering the secretion of hormones that regulate satiety and food intake. An appropriate nutrient stimulus, such as a meal or oral nutrient solution, is needed to elicit the secretion of satiety hormones in order to evaluate the impact of dietary and other interventions. Our objective was to compare the effects of oral glucose vs. mixed nutrients on plasma concentrations of glucose and appetite-regulating hormones to determine the most appropriate oral nutrient challenge to trigger robust hormone secretion. A 120 min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was compared with two meal tolerance tests (MTT) of differing formulation to evaluate glucose and satiety hormone responses. Following overnight feed deprivation, male Sprague-Dawley rats were given one of three oral gavages with equal carbohydrate content (2 g CHO/kg) in the form of: (1) Dextrose, (2) Ensure®, or (3) Mixed Meal. A fourth group was given saline as a control. Blood was collected via tail snip and analyzed for glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GIP, PYY, amylin, leptin, and ghrelin. Dextrose resulted in the highest blood glucose at T15 (P = 0.014), while the mixed meal was significantly higher than saline from T30-T120 (P < 0.05). Insulin was higher at T15 with dextrose compared to saline (P = 0.031) and Ensure® (P = 0.033). GLP-1 tAUC was significantly higher with dextrose compared to mixed meal (P = 0.04) while GIP tAUC was higher with dextrose and mixed meal compared to saline (P < 0.05). Changes in tAUC for insulin, amylin, leptin, ghrelin, and PYY did not reach significance. Based on these findings, dextrose appears to provide a robust acute glycemic and hormone response and is therefore likely an appropriate oral solution to reproducibly test the impact of various dietary, surgical, or pharmacological interventions on glucose and satiety hormone response.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2018.00089/fullglycemiasatiety hormonesoral glucose tolerance testmeal tolerance testglucose response
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Danielle T. Vannan
Marc R. Bomhof
Raylene A. Reimer
Raylene A. Reimer
spellingShingle Danielle T. Vannan
Marc R. Bomhof
Raylene A. Reimer
Raylene A. Reimer
Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
Frontiers in Nutrition
glycemia
satiety hormones
oral glucose tolerance test
meal tolerance test
glucose response
author_facet Danielle T. Vannan
Marc R. Bomhof
Raylene A. Reimer
Raylene A. Reimer
author_sort Danielle T. Vannan
title Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
title_short Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
title_full Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
title_fullStr Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Glucose and Satiety Hormone Response to Oral Glucose vs. Two Mixed-Nutrient Meals in Rats
title_sort comparison of glucose and satiety hormone response to oral glucose vs. two mixed-nutrient meals in rats
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Nutrition
issn 2296-861X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The obesity epidemic is driving interest in identifying strategies that enhance appetite control by altering the secretion of hormones that regulate satiety and food intake. An appropriate nutrient stimulus, such as a meal or oral nutrient solution, is needed to elicit the secretion of satiety hormones in order to evaluate the impact of dietary and other interventions. Our objective was to compare the effects of oral glucose vs. mixed nutrients on plasma concentrations of glucose and appetite-regulating hormones to determine the most appropriate oral nutrient challenge to trigger robust hormone secretion. A 120 min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was compared with two meal tolerance tests (MTT) of differing formulation to evaluate glucose and satiety hormone responses. Following overnight feed deprivation, male Sprague-Dawley rats were given one of three oral gavages with equal carbohydrate content (2 g CHO/kg) in the form of: (1) Dextrose, (2) Ensure®, or (3) Mixed Meal. A fourth group was given saline as a control. Blood was collected via tail snip and analyzed for glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GIP, PYY, amylin, leptin, and ghrelin. Dextrose resulted in the highest blood glucose at T15 (P = 0.014), while the mixed meal was significantly higher than saline from T30-T120 (P < 0.05). Insulin was higher at T15 with dextrose compared to saline (P = 0.031) and Ensure® (P = 0.033). GLP-1 tAUC was significantly higher with dextrose compared to mixed meal (P = 0.04) while GIP tAUC was higher with dextrose and mixed meal compared to saline (P < 0.05). Changes in tAUC for insulin, amylin, leptin, ghrelin, and PYY did not reach significance. Based on these findings, dextrose appears to provide a robust acute glycemic and hormone response and is therefore likely an appropriate oral solution to reproducibly test the impact of various dietary, surgical, or pharmacological interventions on glucose and satiety hormone response.
topic glycemia
satiety hormones
oral glucose tolerance test
meal tolerance test
glucose response
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2018.00089/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielletvannan comparisonofglucoseandsatietyhormoneresponsetooralglucosevstwomixednutrientmealsinrats
AT marcrbomhof comparisonofglucoseandsatietyhormoneresponsetooralglucosevstwomixednutrientmealsinrats
AT rayleneareimer comparisonofglucoseandsatietyhormoneresponsetooralglucosevstwomixednutrientmealsinrats
AT rayleneareimer comparisonofglucoseandsatietyhormoneresponsetooralglucosevstwomixednutrientmealsinrats
_version_ 1725184832473923584