Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.

After stone removal, accurate analysis of urinary stone composition is the most crucial laboratory diagnostic procedure for the treatment and recurrence prevention in the stone-forming patient. The most common techniques for routine analysis of stones are infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roswitha Siener, Noor Buchholz, Michel Daudon, Bernhard Hess, Thomas Knoll, Palle J Osther, José Reis-Santos, Kemal Sarica, Olivier Traxer, Alberto Trinchieri, EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889074?pdf=render
id doaj-878d5e5a4937400ba817dce8ec948a21
record_format Article
spelling doaj-878d5e5a4937400ba817dce8ec948a212020-11-25T00:05:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015660610.1371/journal.pone.0156606Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.Roswitha SienerNoor BuchholzMichel DaudonBernhard HessThomas KnollPalle J OstherJosé Reis-SantosKemal SaricaOlivier TraxerAlberto TrinchieriEAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS)After stone removal, accurate analysis of urinary stone composition is the most crucial laboratory diagnostic procedure for the treatment and recurrence prevention in the stone-forming patient. The most common techniques for routine analysis of stones are infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and chemical analysis. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of urinary stone analysis of laboratories in Europe. Nine laboratories from eight European countries participated in six quality control surveys for urinary calculi analyses of the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics, Bonn, Germany, between 2010 and 2014. Each participant received the same blinded test samples for stone analysis. A total of 24 samples, comprising pure substances and mixtures of two or three components, were analysed. The evaluation of the quality of the laboratory in the present study was based on the attainment of 75% of the maximum total points, i.e. 99 points. The methods of stone analysis used were infrared spectroscopy (n = 7), chemical analysis (n = 1) and X-ray diffraction (n = 1). In the present study only 56% of the laboratories, four using infrared spectroscopy and one using X-ray diffraction, fulfilled the quality requirements. According to the current standard, chemical analysis is considered to be insufficient for stone analysis, whereas infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is mandatory. However, the poor results of infrared spectroscopy highlight the importance of equipment, reference spectra and qualification of the staff for an accurate analysis of stone composition. Regular quality control is essential in carrying out routine stone analysis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889074?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roswitha Siener
Noor Buchholz
Michel Daudon
Bernhard Hess
Thomas Knoll
Palle J Osther
José Reis-Santos
Kemal Sarica
Olivier Traxer
Alberto Trinchieri
EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS)
spellingShingle Roswitha Siener
Noor Buchholz
Michel Daudon
Bernhard Hess
Thomas Knoll
Palle J Osther
José Reis-Santos
Kemal Sarica
Olivier Traxer
Alberto Trinchieri
EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS)
Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Roswitha Siener
Noor Buchholz
Michel Daudon
Bernhard Hess
Thomas Knoll
Palle J Osther
José Reis-Santos
Kemal Sarica
Olivier Traxer
Alberto Trinchieri
EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS)
author_sort Roswitha Siener
title Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
title_short Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
title_full Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
title_fullStr Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
title_full_unstemmed Quality Assessment of Urinary Stone Analysis: Results of a Multicenter Study of Laboratories in Europe.
title_sort quality assessment of urinary stone analysis: results of a multicenter study of laboratories in europe.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description After stone removal, accurate analysis of urinary stone composition is the most crucial laboratory diagnostic procedure for the treatment and recurrence prevention in the stone-forming patient. The most common techniques for routine analysis of stones are infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and chemical analysis. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of urinary stone analysis of laboratories in Europe. Nine laboratories from eight European countries participated in six quality control surveys for urinary calculi analyses of the Reference Institute for Bioanalytics, Bonn, Germany, between 2010 and 2014. Each participant received the same blinded test samples for stone analysis. A total of 24 samples, comprising pure substances and mixtures of two or three components, were analysed. The evaluation of the quality of the laboratory in the present study was based on the attainment of 75% of the maximum total points, i.e. 99 points. The methods of stone analysis used were infrared spectroscopy (n = 7), chemical analysis (n = 1) and X-ray diffraction (n = 1). In the present study only 56% of the laboratories, four using infrared spectroscopy and one using X-ray diffraction, fulfilled the quality requirements. According to the current standard, chemical analysis is considered to be insufficient for stone analysis, whereas infrared spectroscopy or X-ray diffraction is mandatory. However, the poor results of infrared spectroscopy highlight the importance of equipment, reference spectra and qualification of the staff for an accurate analysis of stone composition. Regular quality control is essential in carrying out routine stone analysis.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889074?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT roswithasiener qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT noorbuchholz qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT micheldaudon qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT bernhardhess qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT thomasknoll qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT pallejosther qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT josereissantos qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT kemalsarica qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT oliviertraxer qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT albertotrinchieri qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
AT eausectionofurolithiasiseulis qualityassessmentofurinarystoneanalysisresultsofamulticenterstudyoflaboratoriesineurope
_version_ 1725423490942631936