The Institution as Context
Over the past two decades, institutional discourse has become an area of great import in the field of discourse analysis. Institutionality is rife in everyday interactions, occurring in workplaces, homes, and schools, as well as both face-to-face and telephone or virtual interactions (Drew & Her...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Columbia University Libraries
2010-05-01
|
Series: | Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1440 |
id |
doaj-877e08a477464997bc284fcdba61bbe2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-877e08a477464997bc284fcdba61bbe22020-11-25T02:39:38ZengColumbia University LibrariesStudies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL2689-193X2010-05-0110110.7916/salt.v10i1.1440The Institution as ContextTara E. TarpeyOver the past two decades, institutional discourse has become an area of great import in the field of discourse analysis. Institutionality is rife in everyday interactions, occurring in workplaces, homes, and schools, as well as both face-to-face and telephone or virtual interactions (Drew & Heritage, 1992). Essentially, whenever an individual represents an institution, institutionality may color the discourse. In their seminal book, Talk at Work, Drew and Heritage (1992) define institutional talk as orienting to goals, constraining contributions, and shaping inferences. Following Drew and Heritage‟s framework, Waring (2005) identifies peer tutoring as a “privileged site for observing” institutional interactions, as “doing tutoring” is subject to goal orientation, constraints on allowable contributions, and unique inferential patterns (pp. 141-142). This piece focuses on one peer tutoring sequence to exemplify both how and why institutionality is oriented to in talk. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1440 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tara E. Tarpey |
spellingShingle |
Tara E. Tarpey The Institution as Context Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL |
author_facet |
Tara E. Tarpey |
author_sort |
Tara E. Tarpey |
title |
The Institution as Context |
title_short |
The Institution as Context |
title_full |
The Institution as Context |
title_fullStr |
The Institution as Context |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Institution as Context |
title_sort |
institution as context |
publisher |
Columbia University Libraries |
series |
Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL |
issn |
2689-193X |
publishDate |
2010-05-01 |
description |
Over the past two decades, institutional discourse has become an area of great import in the field of discourse analysis. Institutionality is rife in everyday interactions, occurring in workplaces, homes, and schools, as well as both face-to-face and telephone or virtual interactions (Drew & Heritage, 1992). Essentially, whenever an individual represents an institution, institutionality may color the discourse. In their seminal book, Talk at Work, Drew and Heritage (1992) define institutional talk as orienting to goals, constraining contributions, and shaping inferences. Following Drew and Heritage‟s framework, Waring (2005) identifies peer tutoring as a “privileged site for observing” institutional interactions, as “doing tutoring” is subject to goal orientation, constraints on allowable contributions, and unique inferential patterns (pp. 141-142). This piece focuses on one peer tutoring sequence to exemplify both how and why institutionality is oriented to in talk.
|
url |
https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1440 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taraetarpey theinstitutionascontext AT taraetarpey institutionascontext |
_version_ |
1724784829392748544 |