Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans

<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing interest about biological effective dose (BED) and its application in treatment plan evaluation due to its stronger correlation with treatment outcome. An approximate biological effective dose (BED<sub>A</sub>) equation was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin I Kauweloa, Alonso N Gutierrez, Angelo Bergamo, Sotirios Stathakis, Niko Papanikolaou, Panayiotis Mavroidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJCTO 2014-03-01
Series:International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
Online Access:http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/109
id doaj-8777356ecd5443989d3e2a3e11a34eb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8777356ecd5443989d3e2a3e11a34eb22020-11-24T22:50:34ZengIJCTOInternational Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology 2330-40492014-03-012260Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plansKevin I Kauweloa0Alonso N Gutierrez1Angelo Bergamo2Sotirios Stathakis3Niko Papanikolaou4Panayiotis Mavroidis5Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing interest about biological effective dose (BED) and its application in treatment plan evaluation due to its stronger correlation with treatment outcome. An approximate biological effective dose (BED<sub>A</sub>) equation was introduced in order to simplify BED calculations by treatment planning systems in multi-phase treatments. The purpose of this work is to reveal its mathematical properties relative to the true, multi-phase BED (BED<sub>T</sub>) equation.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: The BED<sub>T</sub> equation was derived and used to reveal the mathematical properties of BED<sub>A</sub>. MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) was used to simulate and analyze common and extreme clinical multi-phase cases. In those cases, percent error and Bland-Altman analysis were used to study the significance of the inaccuracies of BED<sub>A</sub> for different combinations of total doses, numbers of fractions, doses per fractions and α/β values. All the calculations were performed on a voxel-basis in order to study how dose distributions would affect the accuracy of BED<sub>A</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the voxel dose-per-fractions (DPF) delivered by both phases are equal, BED<sub>A</sub> and BED<sub>T</sub> are equal (0% error). In heterogeneous dose distributions, which significantly vary between the phases, there are fewer occurrences of equal DPFs and hence the imprecision of BED<sub>A</sub> is greater. It was shown that as the α/β ratio increased the accuracy of BED<sub>A</sub> would improve. Examining twenty-four cases, it was shown that the range of DPF ratios for 3% P<sub>error</sub> varied from 0.32 to 7.50Gy, whereas for P<sub>error</sub> of 1% the range varied from 0.50 to 2.96Gy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The DPF between the different phases should be equal in order to render BED<sub>A</sub> accurate. OARs typically receive heterogeneous dose distributions hence the probability of equal DPFs is low. Consequently, the BED<sub>A</sub> equation should only be used for targets or OARs that receive uniform or very similar dose distributions by the different treatment phases.</p><p><strong>---------------------------</strong></p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Kauweloa KI, Gutierrez AN, Bergamo A, Stathakis S, Papaniko-laou N, Mavroidis P. Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020226. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.26</strong></p>http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin I Kauweloa
Alonso N Gutierrez
Angelo Bergamo
Sotirios Stathakis
Niko Papanikolaou
Panayiotis Mavroidis
spellingShingle Kevin I Kauweloa
Alonso N Gutierrez
Angelo Bergamo
Sotirios Stathakis
Niko Papanikolaou
Panayiotis Mavroidis
Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
author_facet Kevin I Kauweloa
Alonso N Gutierrez
Angelo Bergamo
Sotirios Stathakis
Niko Papanikolaou
Panayiotis Mavroidis
author_sort Kevin I Kauweloa
title Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
title_short Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
title_full Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
title_fullStr Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
title_sort mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (bed) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans
publisher IJCTO
series International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
issn 2330-4049
publishDate 2014-03-01
description <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is growing interest about biological effective dose (BED) and its application in treatment plan evaluation due to its stronger correlation with treatment outcome. An approximate biological effective dose (BED<sub>A</sub>) equation was introduced in order to simplify BED calculations by treatment planning systems in multi-phase treatments. The purpose of this work is to reveal its mathematical properties relative to the true, multi-phase BED (BED<sub>T</sub>) equation.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: The BED<sub>T</sub> equation was derived and used to reveal the mathematical properties of BED<sub>A</sub>. MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) was used to simulate and analyze common and extreme clinical multi-phase cases. In those cases, percent error and Bland-Altman analysis were used to study the significance of the inaccuracies of BED<sub>A</sub> for different combinations of total doses, numbers of fractions, doses per fractions and α/β values. All the calculations were performed on a voxel-basis in order to study how dose distributions would affect the accuracy of BED<sub>A</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the voxel dose-per-fractions (DPF) delivered by both phases are equal, BED<sub>A</sub> and BED<sub>T</sub> are equal (0% error). In heterogeneous dose distributions, which significantly vary between the phases, there are fewer occurrences of equal DPFs and hence the imprecision of BED<sub>A</sub> is greater. It was shown that as the α/β ratio increased the accuracy of BED<sub>A</sub> would improve. Examining twenty-four cases, it was shown that the range of DPF ratios for 3% P<sub>error</sub> varied from 0.32 to 7.50Gy, whereas for P<sub>error</sub> of 1% the range varied from 0.50 to 2.96Gy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The DPF between the different phases should be equal in order to render BED<sub>A</sub> accurate. OARs typically receive heterogeneous dose distributions hence the probability of equal DPFs is low. Consequently, the BED<sub>A</sub> equation should only be used for targets or OARs that receive uniform or very similar dose distributions by the different treatment phases.</p><p><strong>---------------------------</strong></p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Kauweloa KI, Gutierrez AN, Bergamo A, Stathakis S, Papaniko-laou N, Mavroidis P. Mathematical analysis of approximate biological effective dose (BED) calculation for multi-phase radiotherapy treatment plans. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020226. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.26</strong></p>
url http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/109
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinikauweloa mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
AT alonsongutierrez mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
AT angelobergamo mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
AT sotiriosstathakis mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
AT nikopapanikolaou mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
AT panayiotismavroidis mathematicalanalysisofapproximatebiologicaleffectivedosebedcalculationformultiphaseradiotherapytreatmentplans
_version_ 1725671996949266432