Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
Architectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
NR&DI URBAN-INCERC
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdf |
id |
doaj-8772332b098b42acbee72f0e247da5ed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8772332b098b42acbee72f0e247da5ed2021-05-02T08:14:32ZengNR&DI URBAN-INCERCUrbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii2069-05092069-64692017-09-0183283298Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritageFatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj0Kypros Pilakoutas1Iman Hajirasouliha2Iran University of Science and TechnologyThe University of SheffieldThe University of SheffieldArchitectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget restrictions, different buildings may need different treatments due to differences in exposure to seismic hazard, relative importance and vulnerability. Therefore, there is a need for a decision making strategy to find optimized solutions to achieve the highest possible stability and benefits. The primary objective of this research is to develop a practical step-by-step decision making process for the planning and prioritization of interventions in architectural heritage structures based on the level of seismic hazard, vulnerability and condition assessment, available preservation and strengthening techniques, compatibility with conservation ethics, available budget and expected benefits in various time schedules. The proposed methodology, is shown by diagram and mathematical formulae, and is demonstrated through a case study example.http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdfarchitectural heritagedecision makingintervention priorityplanningseismic strengthening |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj Kypros Pilakoutas Iman Hajirasouliha |
spellingShingle |
Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj Kypros Pilakoutas Iman Hajirasouliha Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii architectural heritage decision making intervention priority planning seismic strengthening |
author_facet |
Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj Kypros Pilakoutas Iman Hajirasouliha |
author_sort |
Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj |
title |
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
title_short |
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
title_full |
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
title_fullStr |
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
title_sort |
prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage |
publisher |
NR&DI URBAN-INCERC |
series |
Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii |
issn |
2069-0509 2069-6469 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
Architectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget restrictions, different buildings may need different treatments due to differences in exposure to seismic hazard, relative importance and vulnerability. Therefore, there is a need for a decision making strategy to find optimized solutions to achieve the highest possible stability and benefits. The primary objective of this research is to develop a practical step-by-step decision making process for the planning and prioritization of interventions in architectural heritage structures based on the level of seismic hazard, vulnerability and condition assessment, available preservation and strengthening techniques, compatibility with conservation ethics, available budget and expected benefits in various time schedules. The proposed methodology, is shown by diagram and mathematical formulae, and is demonstrated through a case study example. |
topic |
architectural heritage decision making intervention priority planning seismic strengthening |
url |
http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fatemehmehdizadehsaradj prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage AT kyprospilakoutas prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage AT imanhajirasouliha prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage |
_version_ |
1721493865593044992 |