Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage

Architectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj, Kypros Pilakoutas, Iman Hajirasouliha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NR&DI URBAN-INCERC 2017-09-01
Series:Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii
Subjects:
Online Access:http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdf
id doaj-8772332b098b42acbee72f0e247da5ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8772332b098b42acbee72f0e247da5ed2021-05-02T08:14:32ZengNR&DI URBAN-INCERCUrbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii2069-05092069-64692017-09-0183283298Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritageFatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj0Kypros Pilakoutas1Iman Hajirasouliha2Iran University of Science and TechnologyThe University of SheffieldThe University of SheffieldArchitectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget restrictions, different buildings may need different treatments due to differences in exposure to seismic hazard, relative importance and vulnerability. Therefore, there is a need for a decision making strategy to find optimized solutions to achieve the highest possible stability and benefits. The primary objective of this research is to develop a practical step-by-step decision making process for the planning and prioritization of interventions in architectural heritage structures based on the level of seismic hazard, vulnerability and condition assessment, available preservation and strengthening techniques, compatibility with conservation ethics, available budget and expected benefits in various time schedules. The proposed methodology, is shown by diagram and mathematical formulae, and is demonstrated through a case study example.http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdfarchitectural heritagedecision makingintervention priorityplanningseismic strengthening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj
Kypros Pilakoutas
Iman Hajirasouliha
spellingShingle Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj
Kypros Pilakoutas
Iman Hajirasouliha
Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii
architectural heritage
decision making
intervention priority
planning
seismic strengthening
author_facet Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj
Kypros Pilakoutas
Iman Hajirasouliha
author_sort Fatemeh Mehdizadeh Saradj
title Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
title_short Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
title_full Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
title_fullStr Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
title_sort prioritization of interventions for strengthening architectural heritage
publisher NR&DI URBAN-INCERC
series Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii
issn 2069-0509
2069-6469
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Architectural heritage is continuously exposed to natural disasters, such as strong earthquakes and this highlights the importance of reducing their vulnerability. While it is not possible to simultaneously strengthen all architectural heritage structures due to the limited skilled labour and budget restrictions, different buildings may need different treatments due to differences in exposure to seismic hazard, relative importance and vulnerability. Therefore, there is a need for a decision making strategy to find optimized solutions to achieve the highest possible stability and benefits. The primary objective of this research is to develop a practical step-by-step decision making process for the planning and prioritization of interventions in architectural heritage structures based on the level of seismic hazard, vulnerability and condition assessment, available preservation and strengthening techniques, compatibility with conservation ethics, available budget and expected benefits in various time schedules. The proposed methodology, is shown by diagram and mathematical formulae, and is demonstrated through a case study example.
topic architectural heritage
decision making
intervention priority
planning
seismic strengthening
url http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v8n3a06.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehmehdizadehsaradj prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage
AT kyprospilakoutas prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage
AT imanhajirasouliha prioritizationofinterventionsforstrengtheningarchitecturalheritage
_version_ 1721493865593044992