Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water

Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of water-soluble DL-methionine supplied through water on the performance of laying hens. Two diet formulations were used in both experiments. For diet 1, nutrient specifications were set to meet or exceed requirements, whereas diet 2 was essentiall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sahin Cadirci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2012-07-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/2457
id doaj-8764e2cdae89405fae3d300e5b756c76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8764e2cdae89405fae3d300e5b756c762020-11-25T01:42:22ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2012-07-01113e46e4610.4081/ijas.2012.e46Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking waterSahin CadirciTwo experiments were conducted to study the effects of water-soluble DL-methionine supplied through water on the performance of laying hens. Two diet formulations were used in both experiments. For diet 1, nutrient specifications were set to meet or exceed requirements, whereas diet 2 was essentially diet 1 without supplemental methionine. Birds were divided into four groups of equal number. In experiment I, group 1 received diet 1 and normal water. Group 2, 3 and 4 received diet 2 and methionine treated water (0.050% for group 2; 0.075% for group 3; 0.100% for group 4). In experiment II, group 1 received diet 1 and normal water. Groups 2, 3 and 4 received diet 2 and methionine treated water (0.025% for group 2; 0.050% for group 3; 0.075% for group 4). In both experiments there were significant differences in egg weight and methionine intake between the groups, whereas no significant differences were observed in feed intake, water intake, egg production and feed conversation ratio. In the case of egg mass, significant differences between the treatment groups were found in experiment II but not in experiment I. The results suggest that the source of methionine does not influence its metabolic effect. Thus, it seems that methionine from the water is as good as when supplied wholly from the feed.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/2457Laying hen, Feed intake, Water intake, Methionine, Egg production
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sahin Cadirci
spellingShingle Sahin Cadirci
Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Laying hen, Feed intake, Water intake, Methionine, Egg production
author_facet Sahin Cadirci
author_sort Sahin Cadirci
title Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
title_short Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
title_full Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
title_fullStr Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
title_full_unstemmed Possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
title_sort possible effects of delivering methionine to laying hens in drinking water
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
publishDate 2012-07-01
description Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of water-soluble DL-methionine supplied through water on the performance of laying hens. Two diet formulations were used in both experiments. For diet 1, nutrient specifications were set to meet or exceed requirements, whereas diet 2 was essentially diet 1 without supplemental methionine. Birds were divided into four groups of equal number. In experiment I, group 1 received diet 1 and normal water. Group 2, 3 and 4 received diet 2 and methionine treated water (0.050% for group 2; 0.075% for group 3; 0.100% for group 4). In experiment II, group 1 received diet 1 and normal water. Groups 2, 3 and 4 received diet 2 and methionine treated water (0.025% for group 2; 0.050% for group 3; 0.075% for group 4). In both experiments there were significant differences in egg weight and methionine intake between the groups, whereas no significant differences were observed in feed intake, water intake, egg production and feed conversation ratio. In the case of egg mass, significant differences between the treatment groups were found in experiment II but not in experiment I. The results suggest that the source of methionine does not influence its metabolic effect. Thus, it seems that methionine from the water is as good as when supplied wholly from the feed.
topic Laying hen, Feed intake, Water intake, Methionine, Egg production
url http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/2457
work_keys_str_mv AT sahincadirci possibleeffectsofdeliveringmethioninetolayinghensindrinkingwater
_version_ 1725036943493824512