Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa

This study address historical legacy of South Africa that has dual economies resembling low and high income beef sectors. Low-income herds are farmed mainly under communal village or land reform farms. The study focused on providing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) to the low-income sector...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela, Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana, Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.611182/full
id doaj-8762ef827a6a47eeb593db5a462920a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8762ef827a6a47eeb593db5a462920a42021-07-23T08:44:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692021-07-01810.3389/fvets.2021.611182611182Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South AfricaNkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela0Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana1Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe2Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale3Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (South Africa), Pretoria, South AfricaDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South AfricaDepartment of Animal Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South AfricaDepartment of Animal Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South AfricaThis study address historical legacy of South Africa that has dual economies resembling low and high income beef sectors. Low-income herds are farmed mainly under communal village or land reform farms. The study focused on providing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) to the low-income sector including finding challenges to its implementation and adoption. The study was conducted in Limpopo, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal provinces using mixed methods that looked at cows and sectors stakeholders. Data collected and evaluated on cows included breed type, frame size, body condition, age parity, and lactation status. Cows were exposed to ART through synchronisation, oestrus detection, fixed time artificial insemination and pregnancy diagnosis. Qualitative data was collected to study perception of key stakeholders on ART implementation and adoption. Chi-Square Test was computed to determine the association among cow factors. Qualitative data was collected, coded and managed into themes using Nvivo Version 11. Themes that emerged were interpreted using critical social and systems thinking. Conception rate was not independent of provinces (P < 0.05), cow body condition score (BCS) and body frame size. KwaZulu-Natal cows had the highest conception rate at 66% (P < 0.05) than Limpopo (44%) and Mpumalanga (60%) provinces. Cows with a BCS higher than 3.5 had higher conception rate (P < 0.05) than those with BCS of <2.5 and 3. Interestingly, large framed cow size had higher conception rate than medium and small framed (P < 0.05) cows. The study achieved a 100% calf survival rate. Calving rate was influenced by body BCS, province and district (P < 0.05). Calving rate of 58% in Mpumalanga and 54% in KwaZulu-Natal was higher than that recorded in Limpopo at 36% (P < 0.05). Interestingly, cows with BCS of <2.5 had a higher calving rate than those with a higher body condition score of 3 (P < 0.05). Perception study results revealed many factors that could affect the adoption and implementation of ART in the study areas. The high success rate and above average reproductive performance led to North West and KwaZulu-Natal provinces adopting ART as part of their low-income beef sector support.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.611182/fullbody condition scorecalving rateassisted reproductive technologieslow-income beef sectorcattle stakeholders
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela
Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana
Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe
Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale
spellingShingle Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela
Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana
Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe
Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale
Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
body condition score
calving rate
assisted reproductive technologies
low-income beef sector
cattle stakeholders
author_facet Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela
Thinawanga Joseph Mugwabana
Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe
Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale
author_sort Nkhanedzeni Baldwin Nengovhela
title Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
title_short Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
title_full Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
title_fullStr Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Accessibility to Reproductive Technologies by Low-Income Beef Farmers in South Africa
title_sort accessibility to reproductive technologies by low-income beef farmers in south africa
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
issn 2297-1769
publishDate 2021-07-01
description This study address historical legacy of South Africa that has dual economies resembling low and high income beef sectors. Low-income herds are farmed mainly under communal village or land reform farms. The study focused on providing assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) to the low-income sector including finding challenges to its implementation and adoption. The study was conducted in Limpopo, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal provinces using mixed methods that looked at cows and sectors stakeholders. Data collected and evaluated on cows included breed type, frame size, body condition, age parity, and lactation status. Cows were exposed to ART through synchronisation, oestrus detection, fixed time artificial insemination and pregnancy diagnosis. Qualitative data was collected to study perception of key stakeholders on ART implementation and adoption. Chi-Square Test was computed to determine the association among cow factors. Qualitative data was collected, coded and managed into themes using Nvivo Version 11. Themes that emerged were interpreted using critical social and systems thinking. Conception rate was not independent of provinces (P < 0.05), cow body condition score (BCS) and body frame size. KwaZulu-Natal cows had the highest conception rate at 66% (P < 0.05) than Limpopo (44%) and Mpumalanga (60%) provinces. Cows with a BCS higher than 3.5 had higher conception rate (P < 0.05) than those with BCS of <2.5 and 3. Interestingly, large framed cow size had higher conception rate than medium and small framed (P < 0.05) cows. The study achieved a 100% calf survival rate. Calving rate was influenced by body BCS, province and district (P < 0.05). Calving rate of 58% in Mpumalanga and 54% in KwaZulu-Natal was higher than that recorded in Limpopo at 36% (P < 0.05). Interestingly, cows with BCS of <2.5 had a higher calving rate than those with a higher body condition score of 3 (P < 0.05). Perception study results revealed many factors that could affect the adoption and implementation of ART in the study areas. The high success rate and above average reproductive performance led to North West and KwaZulu-Natal provinces adopting ART as part of their low-income beef sector support.
topic body condition score
calving rate
assisted reproductive technologies
low-income beef sector
cattle stakeholders
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.611182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nkhanedzenibaldwinnengovhela accessibilitytoreproductivetechnologiesbylowincomebeeffarmersinsouthafrica
AT thinawangajosephmugwabana accessibilitytoreproductivetechnologiesbylowincomebeeffarmersinsouthafrica
AT khathutsheloagreenephawe accessibilitytoreproductivetechnologiesbylowincomebeeffarmersinsouthafrica
AT tshimangadzoluckynedambale accessibilitytoreproductivetechnologiesbylowincomebeeffarmersinsouthafrica
_version_ 1721290278387580928