Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions

This paper describes nitrogen losses from, and the characteristics of, 35 selected catchments (12 to 2000 ha) in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Average annual losses of N in 1994–1997 ranged from 5 to 75 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, generally highest and characterised by significant withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Vagstad, P. Stålnacke, H.-E. Andersen, J. Deelstra, V. Jansons, K. Kyllmar, E. Loigu, S. Rekolainen, R. Tumas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2004-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/651/2004/hess-8-651-2004.pdf
id doaj-875ed10ac87a492f9cf3a914c2bd5522
record_format Article
spelling doaj-875ed10ac87a492f9cf3a914c2bd55222020-11-24T22:43:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382004-01-0184651662Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regionsN. VagstadN. VagstadP. StålnackeP. StålnackeH.-E. AndersenH.-E. AndersenJ. DeelstraJ. DeelstraV. JansonsV. JansonsK. KyllmarK. KyllmarE. LoiguE. LoiguS. RekolainenS. RekolainenR. TumasR. TumasThis paper describes nitrogen losses from, and the characteristics of, 35 selected catchments (12 to 2000 ha) in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Average annual losses of N in 1994–1997 ranged from 5 to 75 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, generally highest and characterised by significant within-country and interannual variations, in Norway and the lowest losses were observed in the Baltic countries. An important finding of the study is that the average nutrient losses varied greatly among the studied catchments. The main explanations for this variability were water runoff, fertiliser use (especially the amount of manure), soil type and erosion (including stream bank erosion). However, there were several exceptions, and it was difficult to find general relationships between the individual factors. For example, there was poor correlation between nitrogen losses and surpluses. Therefore, the results suggest that the observed variability in N losses cannot have been due solely to differences in farm management practices, although the studied catchments do include a wide range of nutrient application levels, animal densities and other relevant elements. There is considerable spatial variation in the physical properties (soil, climate, hydrology, and topography) and the agricultural management of the basins, and the interaction between and relative effects of these factors has an important impact on erosion and nutrient losses. In particular, hydrological processes may have a marked effect on N losses measured in the catchment stream water. The results indicate that significant differences in hydrological pathways (e.g. the relationship between fast- and slow-flow processes) lead to major regional differences in N inputs to surface waters and therefore also in the response to changes in field management practices. Agricultural practices such as crop rotation systems, nutrient inputs and soil conservation measures obviously play a significant role in the site-specific effects, although they cannot explain the large regional differences observed in this study. The interactions between agricultural practices and basic catchment characteristics, including hydrological processes, determine the final losses of nitrogen to surface waters, hence it is necessary to understand these interactions to manage diffuse losses of agricultural nutrients efficiently.</p> <p style='line-height: 20px;'><b>Keywords: </b>agriculture, catchments, diffuse sources, nitrogen, losses, Baltic, Nordichttp://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/651/2004/hess-8-651-2004.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Vagstad
N. Vagstad
P. Stålnacke
P. Stålnacke
H.-E. Andersen
H.-E. Andersen
J. Deelstra
J. Deelstra
V. Jansons
V. Jansons
K. Kyllmar
K. Kyllmar
E. Loigu
E. Loigu
S. Rekolainen
S. Rekolainen
R. Tumas
R. Tumas
spellingShingle N. Vagstad
N. Vagstad
P. Stålnacke
P. Stålnacke
H.-E. Andersen
H.-E. Andersen
J. Deelstra
J. Deelstra
V. Jansons
V. Jansons
K. Kyllmar
K. Kyllmar
E. Loigu
E. Loigu
S. Rekolainen
S. Rekolainen
R. Tumas
R. Tumas
Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet N. Vagstad
N. Vagstad
P. Stålnacke
P. Stålnacke
H.-E. Andersen
H.-E. Andersen
J. Deelstra
J. Deelstra
V. Jansons
V. Jansons
K. Kyllmar
K. Kyllmar
E. Loigu
E. Loigu
S. Rekolainen
S. Rekolainen
R. Tumas
R. Tumas
author_sort N. Vagstad
title Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
title_short Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
title_full Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
title_fullStr Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
title_full_unstemmed Regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the Nordic and Baltic regions
title_sort regional variations in diffuse nitrogen losses from agriculture in the nordic and baltic regions
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2004-01-01
description This paper describes nitrogen losses from, and the characteristics of, 35 selected catchments (12 to 2000 ha) in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Average annual losses of N in 1994–1997 ranged from 5 to 75 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, generally highest and characterised by significant within-country and interannual variations, in Norway and the lowest losses were observed in the Baltic countries. An important finding of the study is that the average nutrient losses varied greatly among the studied catchments. The main explanations for this variability were water runoff, fertiliser use (especially the amount of manure), soil type and erosion (including stream bank erosion). However, there were several exceptions, and it was difficult to find general relationships between the individual factors. For example, there was poor correlation between nitrogen losses and surpluses. Therefore, the results suggest that the observed variability in N losses cannot have been due solely to differences in farm management practices, although the studied catchments do include a wide range of nutrient application levels, animal densities and other relevant elements. There is considerable spatial variation in the physical properties (soil, climate, hydrology, and topography) and the agricultural management of the basins, and the interaction between and relative effects of these factors has an important impact on erosion and nutrient losses. In particular, hydrological processes may have a marked effect on N losses measured in the catchment stream water. The results indicate that significant differences in hydrological pathways (e.g. the relationship between fast- and slow-flow processes) lead to major regional differences in N inputs to surface waters and therefore also in the response to changes in field management practices. Agricultural practices such as crop rotation systems, nutrient inputs and soil conservation measures obviously play a significant role in the site-specific effects, although they cannot explain the large regional differences observed in this study. The interactions between agricultural practices and basic catchment characteristics, including hydrological processes, determine the final losses of nitrogen to surface waters, hence it is necessary to understand these interactions to manage diffuse losses of agricultural nutrients efficiently.</p> <p style='line-height: 20px;'><b>Keywords: </b>agriculture, catchments, diffuse sources, nitrogen, losses, Baltic, Nordic
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/8/651/2004/hess-8-651-2004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nvagstad regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT nvagstad regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT pstalnacke regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT pstalnacke regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT heandersen regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT heandersen regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT jdeelstra regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT jdeelstra regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT vjansons regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT vjansons regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT kkyllmar regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT kkyllmar regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT eloigu regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT eloigu regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT srekolainen regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT srekolainen regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT rtumas regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
AT rtumas regionalvariationsindiffusenitrogenlossesfromagricultureinthenordicandbalticregions
_version_ 1725696753841209344