Meta‐analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards
Abstract Decades of environmental DNA (eDNA) method application, spanning a wide variety of taxa and habitats, has advanced our understanding of eDNA and underlined its value as a tool for conservation practitioners. The general consensus is that eDNA methods are more accurate and cost‐effective tha...
Main Authors: | Julija Fediajevaite, Victoria Priestley, Richard Arnold, Vincent Savolainen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7382 |
Similar Items
-
Paired sampling standardizes point count data from humans and acoustic recorders
by: Steven L. Van Wilgenburg, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Distribution, Genetic Characterization, and Life History of the James spinymussel, Pleurobema collina (Bivalvia: Unionidae), in Virginia and North Carolina
by: Petty, Melissa A.
Published: (2014) -
Are Some Forecasters’ Probability Assessments of Macro Variables Better Than Those of Others?
by: Michael P. Clements
Published: (2020-05-01) -
High‐density camera trap grid reveals lack of consistency in detection and capture rates across space and time
by: Joseph M. Kolowski, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Detection Range of Airborne Magnetometers in Magnetic Anomaly Detection
by: Chengjing Li, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)