Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)

The Chaumié circular introduced the notion of « diminished responsibility » in 1905 in order to consider criminal defendants with mental retardations or psychic abnormalities. During the Fourth Republic (1947-1959), psychiatric examinations were almost always conducted in criminal cases, especially...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolas Picard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Criminocorpus 2014-09-01
Series:Criminocorpus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/2725
id doaj-8757f5577e7245959d842a18e88be8db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8757f5577e7245959d842a18e88be8db2020-11-25T00:46:02ZengCriminocorpusCriminocorpus2108-69072014-09-01Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)Nicolas PicardThe Chaumié circular introduced the notion of « diminished responsibility » in 1905 in order to consider criminal defendants with mental retardations or psychic abnormalities. During the Fourth Republic (1947-1959), psychiatric examinations were almost always conducted in criminal cases, especially when the death penalty was at stake. It was then assumed that the mentally unbalanced and retarded criminals shouldn't be executed. However, a study of the pardon requests indicates that a « diminished responsibility » could not always prevent an execution. The president of the Republic had the right to pardon these criminals but it seems that the conclusions of psychiatric examinations influenced the decisions only to a limited extent.http://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/2725death penaltypardoncriminal responsibilitymental disordersFrench Fourth Republic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolas Picard
spellingShingle Nicolas Picard
Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
Criminocorpus
death penalty
pardon
criminal responsibility
mental disorders
French Fourth Republic
author_facet Nicolas Picard
author_sort Nicolas Picard
title Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
title_short Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
title_full Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
title_fullStr Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
title_full_unstemmed Guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? Atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (France, IVe République)
title_sort guillotiner les simples d’esprit et les « demi-fous » ? atténuation de la responsabilité pénale et application de la peine de mort (france, ive république)
publisher Criminocorpus
series Criminocorpus
issn 2108-6907
publishDate 2014-09-01
description The Chaumié circular introduced the notion of « diminished responsibility » in 1905 in order to consider criminal defendants with mental retardations or psychic abnormalities. During the Fourth Republic (1947-1959), psychiatric examinations were almost always conducted in criminal cases, especially when the death penalty was at stake. It was then assumed that the mentally unbalanced and retarded criminals shouldn't be executed. However, a study of the pardon requests indicates that a « diminished responsibility » could not always prevent an execution. The president of the Republic had the right to pardon these criminals but it seems that the conclusions of psychiatric examinations influenced the decisions only to a limited extent.
topic death penalty
pardon
criminal responsibility
mental disorders
French Fourth Republic
url http://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/2725
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaspicard guillotinerlessimplesdespritetlesdemifousattenuationdelaresponsabilitepenaleetapplicationdelapeinedemortfranceiverepublique
_version_ 1725267437651230720