The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit

Hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. M. Ulyev, O. Kapustenko P, D. Nechiporenko D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2014-08-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330
id doaj-874be744fad84591b986e3f70264ec03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-874be744fad84591b986e3f70264ec032021-02-21T20:59:38ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162014-08-013910.3303/CET1439029The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming UnitL. M. UlyevO. Kapustenko PD. Nechiporenko DHydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagnostics for these sections was carried out. Comparative economic analysis of their effectiveness after the proposed retrofit was performed for each section separately and for the total their flowsheet. The implementation of the Pinch Method for hydrotreating section will reduce energy intensity by 2.2 MW. Energy consumption for catalytic reforming section reduced by 6.4 MW. Energy consumption for joint integration of hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section reduced by 11.4 MW. Therefore, it was concluded that Pinch design for these sections of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 is most advisable to carry out for the two sections together.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. M. Ulyev
O. Kapustenko P
D. Nechiporenko D
spellingShingle L. M. Ulyev
O. Kapustenko P
D. Nechiporenko D
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet L. M. Ulyev
O. Kapustenko P
D. Nechiporenko D
author_sort L. M. Ulyev
title The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
title_short The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
title_full The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
title_fullStr The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
title_full_unstemmed The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
title_sort choice of the optimal retrofit method for sections of the catalytic reforming unit
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagnostics for these sections was carried out. Comparative economic analysis of their effectiveness after the proposed retrofit was performed for each section separately and for the total their flowsheet. The implementation of the Pinch Method for hydrotreating section will reduce energy intensity by 2.2 MW. Energy consumption for catalytic reforming section reduced by 6.4 MW. Energy consumption for joint integration of hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section reduced by 11.4 MW. Therefore, it was concluded that Pinch design for these sections of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 is most advisable to carry out for the two sections together.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330
work_keys_str_mv AT lmulyev thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
AT okapustenkop thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
AT dnechiporenkod thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
AT lmulyev choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
AT okapustenkop choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
AT dnechiporenkod choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit
_version_ 1724257591188520960