The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit
Hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagno...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Chemical Engineering Transactions |
Online Access: | https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330 |
id |
doaj-874be744fad84591b986e3f70264ec03 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-874be744fad84591b986e3f70264ec032021-02-21T20:59:38ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162014-08-013910.3303/CET1439029The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming UnitL. M. UlyevO. Kapustenko PD. Nechiporenko DHydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagnostics for these sections was carried out. Comparative economic analysis of their effectiveness after the proposed retrofit was performed for each section separately and for the total their flowsheet. The implementation of the Pinch Method for hydrotreating section will reduce energy intensity by 2.2 MW. Energy consumption for catalytic reforming section reduced by 6.4 MW. Energy consumption for joint integration of hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section reduced by 11.4 MW. Therefore, it was concluded that Pinch design for these sections of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 is most advisable to carry out for the two sections together.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
L. M. Ulyev O. Kapustenko P D. Nechiporenko D |
spellingShingle |
L. M. Ulyev O. Kapustenko P D. Nechiporenko D The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit Chemical Engineering Transactions |
author_facet |
L. M. Ulyev O. Kapustenko P D. Nechiporenko D |
author_sort |
L. M. Ulyev |
title |
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit |
title_short |
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit |
title_full |
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit |
title_fullStr |
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Choice of the Optimal Retrofit Method for Sections of the Catalytic Reforming Unit |
title_sort |
choice of the optimal retrofit method for sections of the catalytic reforming unit |
publisher |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. |
series |
Chemical Engineering Transactions |
issn |
2283-9216 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
Hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 were examined in this paper. This unit was designed for processing large fraction of naphtha by catalytic reforming in order to obtain components of gasoline with an octane number 78-85 points. Pinch diagnostics for these sections was carried out. Comparative economic analysis of their effectiveness after the proposed retrofit was performed for each section separately and for the total their flowsheet. The implementation of the Pinch Method for hydrotreating section will reduce energy intensity by 2.2 MW. Energy consumption for catalytic reforming section reduced by 6.4 MW. Energy consumption for joint integration of hydrotreating section and catalytic reforming section reduced by 11.4 MW. Therefore, it was concluded that Pinch design for these sections of catalytic reforming unit L-35-11/600 is most advisable to carry out for the two sections together. |
url |
https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5330 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lmulyev thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit AT okapustenkop thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit AT dnechiporenkod thechoiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit AT lmulyev choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit AT okapustenkop choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit AT dnechiporenkod choiceoftheoptimalretrofitmethodforsectionsofthecatalyticreformingunit |
_version_ |
1724257591188520960 |