Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging

<p>Abstract</p> <p>There is growing recognition of the importance of data sharing in the neurosciences, and in particular in the field of neuroimaging research, in order to best make use of the volumes of human subject data that have been acquired to date. However, a number of barr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Breeze Janis L, Poline Jean-Baptiste, Kennedy David N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2012-07-01
Series:GigaScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/content/1/1/9
id doaj-874a5a2d0e564c06bb2471d7a2d29a24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-874a5a2d0e564c06bb2471d7a2d29a242020-11-24T23:44:24ZengOxford University PressGigaScience2047-217X2012-07-0111910.1186/2047-217X-1-9Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimagingBreeze Janis LPoline Jean-BaptisteKennedy David N<p>Abstract</p> <p>There is growing recognition of the importance of data sharing in the neurosciences, and in particular in the field of neuroimaging research, in order to best make use of the volumes of human subject data that have been acquired to date. However, a number of barriers, both practical and cultural, continue to impede the widespread practice of data sharing; these include: lack of standard infrastructure and tools for data sharing, uncertainty about how to organize and prepare the data for sharing, and researchers’ fears about unattributed data use or missed opportunities for publication. A further challenge is how the scientific community should best describe and/or reference shared data that is used in secondary analyses. Finally, issues of human research subject protections and the ethical use of such data are an ongoing source of concern for neuroimaging researchers.</p> <p>One crucial issue is how producers of shared data can and should be acknowledged and how this important component of science will benefit individuals in their academic careers. While we encourage the field to make use of these opportunities for data publishing, it is critical that standards for metadata, provenance, and other descriptors are used. This commentary outlines the efforts of the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility Task Force on Neuroimaging Datasharing to coordinate and establish such standards, as well as potential ways forward to relieve the issues that researchers who produce these massive, reusable community resources face when making the data rapidly and freely available to the public. Both the technical and human aspects of data sharing must be addressed if we are to go forward.</p> http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/content/1/1/9NeuroimagingNeuroscienceData sharingData publishingStandards
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Breeze Janis L
Poline Jean-Baptiste
Kennedy David N
spellingShingle Breeze Janis L
Poline Jean-Baptiste
Kennedy David N
Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
GigaScience
Neuroimaging
Neuroscience
Data sharing
Data publishing
Standards
author_facet Breeze Janis L
Poline Jean-Baptiste
Kennedy David N
author_sort Breeze Janis L
title Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
title_short Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
title_full Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
title_fullStr Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
title_full_unstemmed Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
title_sort data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging
publisher Oxford University Press
series GigaScience
issn 2047-217X
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>There is growing recognition of the importance of data sharing in the neurosciences, and in particular in the field of neuroimaging research, in order to best make use of the volumes of human subject data that have been acquired to date. However, a number of barriers, both practical and cultural, continue to impede the widespread practice of data sharing; these include: lack of standard infrastructure and tools for data sharing, uncertainty about how to organize and prepare the data for sharing, and researchers’ fears about unattributed data use or missed opportunities for publication. A further challenge is how the scientific community should best describe and/or reference shared data that is used in secondary analyses. Finally, issues of human research subject protections and the ethical use of such data are an ongoing source of concern for neuroimaging researchers.</p> <p>One crucial issue is how producers of shared data can and should be acknowledged and how this important component of science will benefit individuals in their academic careers. While we encourage the field to make use of these opportunities for data publishing, it is critical that standards for metadata, provenance, and other descriptors are used. This commentary outlines the efforts of the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility Task Force on Neuroimaging Datasharing to coordinate and establish such standards, as well as potential ways forward to relieve the issues that researchers who produce these massive, reusable community resources face when making the data rapidly and freely available to the public. Both the technical and human aspects of data sharing must be addressed if we are to go forward.</p>
topic Neuroimaging
Neuroscience
Data sharing
Data publishing
Standards
url http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/content/1/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT breezejanisl datasharingandpublishinginthefieldofneuroimaging
AT polinejeanbaptiste datasharingandpublishinginthefieldofneuroimaging
AT kennedydavidn datasharingandpublishinginthefieldofneuroimaging
_version_ 1725498728432795648