Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging

Background. Angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB) is a benign mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the female genital tract of premenopausal women. Although rare, AMFB is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of vulvar and vaginal masses, as it must be distinguished from aggressive ang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Eckhardt, Renee Rolston, Suzanne Palmer, Begum Ozel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7397121
id doaj-8735feab5d4b47ffa68034d307bacf18
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8735feab5d4b47ffa68034d307bacf182020-11-24T22:10:03ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology2090-66842090-66922018-01-01201810.1155/2018/73971217397121Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic ImagingSarah Eckhardt0Renee Rolston1Suzanne Palmer2Begum Ozel3Division of Female Pelvic Floor and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USADivision of Female Pelvic Floor and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USAClinical Radiology and Medicine, Keck Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USADivision of Female Pelvic Floor and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USABackground. Angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB) is a benign mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the female genital tract of premenopausal women. Although rare, AMFB is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of vulvar and vaginal masses, as it must be distinguished from aggressive angiomyxoma (AA), a locally recurrent, invasive, and damaging tumor with similar clinical and pathologic findings. Case. We describe a patient with a 4 cm vaginal AMFB and the relevant preoperative radiographic imaging findings. Conclusion. Preoperative diagnosis of AMFB remains difficult. Common findings on magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal sonography are described. We conclude that both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI are potentially useful imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of vulvar and vaginal AMFB, with more data needed to determine superiority of one modality over the other.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7397121
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Eckhardt
Renee Rolston
Suzanne Palmer
Begum Ozel
spellingShingle Sarah Eckhardt
Renee Rolston
Suzanne Palmer
Begum Ozel
Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
author_facet Sarah Eckhardt
Renee Rolston
Suzanne Palmer
Begum Ozel
author_sort Sarah Eckhardt
title Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
title_short Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
title_full Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
title_fullStr Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging
title_sort vaginal angiomyofibroblastoma: a case report and review of diagnostic imaging
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
issn 2090-6684
2090-6692
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background. Angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB) is a benign mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the female genital tract of premenopausal women. Although rare, AMFB is an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of vulvar and vaginal masses, as it must be distinguished from aggressive angiomyxoma (AA), a locally recurrent, invasive, and damaging tumor with similar clinical and pathologic findings. Case. We describe a patient with a 4 cm vaginal AMFB and the relevant preoperative radiographic imaging findings. Conclusion. Preoperative diagnosis of AMFB remains difficult. Common findings on magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal sonography are described. We conclude that both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI are potentially useful imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of vulvar and vaginal AMFB, with more data needed to determine superiority of one modality over the other.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7397121
work_keys_str_mv AT saraheckhardt vaginalangiomyofibroblastomaacasereportandreviewofdiagnosticimaging
AT reneerolston vaginalangiomyofibroblastomaacasereportandreviewofdiagnosticimaging
AT suzannepalmer vaginalangiomyofibroblastomaacasereportandreviewofdiagnosticimaging
AT begumozel vaginalangiomyofibroblastomaacasereportandreviewofdiagnosticimaging
_version_ 1725809590507929600