Editorial Style of Scientific Works: Disagreement and Contrast in the Correspondence Govi-Boncompagni
The second half of the nineteenth century in Italy bore witness to a number of scientific projects of great cultural importance that were unique on the European landscape. The correspondence between Govi and Boncompagni testifies to a scientific partnership throughout the twenty years’ life of the «...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Bologna
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Scienza & Politica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scienzaepolitica.unibo.it/article/view/7578 |
| Summary: | The second half of the nineteenth century in Italy bore witness to a number of scientific projects of great cultural importance that were unique on the European landscape. The correspondence between Govi and Boncompagni testifies to a scientific partnership throughout the twenty years’ life of the «Bullettino di Bibliografia e di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche» (1868-1889). Both these scientists, as scholars of historical studies, bibliophiles and collectors, contributed to the spread of scientific literature and history. Nevertheless they did not agree about the editorial style of the scientific works. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1590-4946 1825-9618 |