Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.

'Rewilding' is an increasingly prominent concept in conservation, but one that has attracted controversy. Debate frequently focuses on human 'control' over nature. 'Traditional' conservation has been presented as involving 'high control,' and rewilding as ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benedict Dempsey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241160
id doaj-872bc76f916b4f25b4e65f7aac12e353
record_format Article
spelling doaj-872bc76f916b4f25b4e65f7aac12e3532021-06-16T04:31:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e024116010.1371/journal.pone.0241160Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.Benedict Dempsey'Rewilding' is an increasingly prominent concept in conservation, but one that has attracted controversy. Debate frequently focuses on human 'control' over nature. 'Traditional' conservation has been presented as involving 'high control,' and rewilding as 'low control.' Opposition to rewilding often stems from a perceived lack of control and associated perception of increased risk and uncertainty. This paper explores the concept of control in conservation. I identify multiple dimensions of control ('stabilisation', 'location', 'prediction' and 'outputs'), illustrating that control is not a simple, linear concept. I compare two ethnographic case studies: the Sussex Wildlife Trust's Old Lodge nature reserve; and Knepp Estate, one of the most influential rewilding projects in the UK. I use them to test assertions made about control in 'traditional' conservation and 'rewilding'. I outline how Old Lodge does not exert precise control in all respects, but involves elements of uncertainty and negotiation. I describe how Knepp's model of rewilding reduces control in some dimensions but potentially increases it in others. I conclude that, while Knepp's rewilding does represent a significant conceptual departure from 'traditional' conservation, it should not be characterised as an approach that reduces control in a simplistic way. Based on this analysis, I argue that reduction of control does not necessarily underpin the concept of rewilding. Rather, there is interplay between different control dimensions that combine to form multiple 'configurations of control.' Using a framework of 'configurations of control', debate about the place of rewilding in conservation can become less polarised, and instead involve an active discussion of what configuration of control is desired. This analysis has the potential to increase understanding of rewilding projects as part of plural conservation strategies, in the UK and globally.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241160
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benedict Dempsey
spellingShingle Benedict Dempsey
Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benedict Dempsey
author_sort Benedict Dempsey
title Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
title_short Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
title_full Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
title_fullStr Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
title_full_unstemmed Everything under control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
title_sort everything under control? comparing knepp estate rewilding project with 'traditional' nature conservation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description 'Rewilding' is an increasingly prominent concept in conservation, but one that has attracted controversy. Debate frequently focuses on human 'control' over nature. 'Traditional' conservation has been presented as involving 'high control,' and rewilding as 'low control.' Opposition to rewilding often stems from a perceived lack of control and associated perception of increased risk and uncertainty. This paper explores the concept of control in conservation. I identify multiple dimensions of control ('stabilisation', 'location', 'prediction' and 'outputs'), illustrating that control is not a simple, linear concept. I compare two ethnographic case studies: the Sussex Wildlife Trust's Old Lodge nature reserve; and Knepp Estate, one of the most influential rewilding projects in the UK. I use them to test assertions made about control in 'traditional' conservation and 'rewilding'. I outline how Old Lodge does not exert precise control in all respects, but involves elements of uncertainty and negotiation. I describe how Knepp's model of rewilding reduces control in some dimensions but potentially increases it in others. I conclude that, while Knepp's rewilding does represent a significant conceptual departure from 'traditional' conservation, it should not be characterised as an approach that reduces control in a simplistic way. Based on this analysis, I argue that reduction of control does not necessarily underpin the concept of rewilding. Rather, there is interplay between different control dimensions that combine to form multiple 'configurations of control.' Using a framework of 'configurations of control', debate about the place of rewilding in conservation can become less polarised, and instead involve an active discussion of what configuration of control is desired. This analysis has the potential to increase understanding of rewilding projects as part of plural conservation strategies, in the UK and globally.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241160
work_keys_str_mv AT benedictdempsey everythingundercontrolcomparingkneppestaterewildingprojectwithtraditionalnatureconservation
_version_ 1721375623522287616