Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Recycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinkyung Oh, Hiroshan Hettiarachchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Recycling
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4
id doaj-87277a2979f04c0990277316dcfb26e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-87277a2979f04c0990277316dcfb26e62020-11-25T03:02:17ZengMDPI AGRecycling2313-43212020-03-01514010.3390/recycling5010004recycling5010004Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development FrameworkJinkyung Oh0Hiroshan Hettiarachchi1United Nations University (UNU-FLORES), 01067 Dresden, GermanyUnited Nations University (UNU-FLORES), 01067 Dresden, GermanyRecycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutions to improve recycling/recovery activities, such solutions might not be necessarily affordable in many countries. A solution that involves the active participation of the population, on the other hand, has the potential to succeed in any country. The challenge is to attract and unite people to achieve such common goals. The theory of collective action and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, that have been originally used in resource management, are two concepts that can be adapted to organize recycling/recovery initiatives. This manuscript discusses what recycling/recovery programs can learn from the theory of collective action and the IAD framework, through a qualitative comparative study of such initiatives from three different cities. They are; Curitiba in Brazil, Padang in Indonesia, and Akure in Nigeria. The cases show the potential benefits of both concepts, not only in formulating and implementing recycling/recovery programs but also in making corrective measures for continuous improvements. All cases also showed the importance of increasing awareness-raising to change public perception towards waste from being a nuisance to a valuable resource.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4collective actioninstitutional analysis and development frameworkwaste policywaste governancewaste managementrecycling and recoverycircular economy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jinkyung Oh
Hiroshan Hettiarachchi
spellingShingle Jinkyung Oh
Hiroshan Hettiarachchi
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Recycling
collective action
institutional analysis and development framework
waste policy
waste governance
waste management
recycling and recovery
circular economy
author_facet Jinkyung Oh
Hiroshan Hettiarachchi
author_sort Jinkyung Oh
title Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
title_short Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
title_full Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
title_fullStr Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
title_full_unstemmed Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
title_sort collective action in waste management: a comparative study of recycling and recovery initiatives from brazil, indonesia, and nigeria using the institutional analysis and development framework
publisher MDPI AG
series Recycling
issn 2313-4321
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Recycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutions to improve recycling/recovery activities, such solutions might not be necessarily affordable in many countries. A solution that involves the active participation of the population, on the other hand, has the potential to succeed in any country. The challenge is to attract and unite people to achieve such common goals. The theory of collective action and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, that have been originally used in resource management, are two concepts that can be adapted to organize recycling/recovery initiatives. This manuscript discusses what recycling/recovery programs can learn from the theory of collective action and the IAD framework, through a qualitative comparative study of such initiatives from three different cities. They are; Curitiba in Brazil, Padang in Indonesia, and Akure in Nigeria. The cases show the potential benefits of both concepts, not only in formulating and implementing recycling/recovery programs but also in making corrective measures for continuous improvements. All cases also showed the importance of increasing awareness-raising to change public perception towards waste from being a nuisance to a valuable resource.
topic collective action
institutional analysis and development framework
waste policy
waste governance
waste management
recycling and recovery
circular economy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT jinkyungoh collectiveactioninwastemanagementacomparativestudyofrecyclingandrecoveryinitiativesfrombrazilindonesiaandnigeriausingtheinstitutionalanalysisanddevelopmentframework
AT hiroshanhettiarachchi collectiveactioninwastemanagementacomparativestudyofrecyclingandrecoveryinitiativesfrombrazilindonesiaandnigeriausingtheinstitutionalanalysisanddevelopmentframework
_version_ 1724690422974906368