Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Recycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutio...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Recycling |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4 |
id |
doaj-87277a2979f04c0990277316dcfb26e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-87277a2979f04c0990277316dcfb26e62020-11-25T03:02:17ZengMDPI AGRecycling2313-43212020-03-01514010.3390/recycling5010004recycling5010004Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development FrameworkJinkyung Oh0Hiroshan Hettiarachchi1United Nations University (UNU-FLORES), 01067 Dresden, GermanyUnited Nations University (UNU-FLORES), 01067 Dresden, GermanyRecycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutions to improve recycling/recovery activities, such solutions might not be necessarily affordable in many countries. A solution that involves the active participation of the population, on the other hand, has the potential to succeed in any country. The challenge is to attract and unite people to achieve such common goals. The theory of collective action and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, that have been originally used in resource management, are two concepts that can be adapted to organize recycling/recovery initiatives. This manuscript discusses what recycling/recovery programs can learn from the theory of collective action and the IAD framework, through a qualitative comparative study of such initiatives from three different cities. They are; Curitiba in Brazil, Padang in Indonesia, and Akure in Nigeria. The cases show the potential benefits of both concepts, not only in formulating and implementing recycling/recovery programs but also in making corrective measures for continuous improvements. All cases also showed the importance of increasing awareness-raising to change public perception towards waste from being a nuisance to a valuable resource.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4collective actioninstitutional analysis and development frameworkwaste policywaste governancewaste managementrecycling and recoverycircular economy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jinkyung Oh Hiroshan Hettiarachchi |
spellingShingle |
Jinkyung Oh Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework Recycling collective action institutional analysis and development framework waste policy waste governance waste management recycling and recovery circular economy |
author_facet |
Jinkyung Oh Hiroshan Hettiarachchi |
author_sort |
Jinkyung Oh |
title |
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework |
title_short |
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework |
title_full |
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework |
title_fullStr |
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collective Action in Waste Management: A Comparative Study of Recycling and Recovery Initiatives from Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria Using the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework |
title_sort |
collective action in waste management: a comparative study of recycling and recovery initiatives from brazil, indonesia, and nigeria using the institutional analysis and development framework |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Recycling |
issn |
2313-4321 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Recycling and recovery provide not only a sustainable option to decrease the volume of waste that needs final disposal, but also a blueprint to a circular economy. However, rates of recycling/recovery still remain very low on a global scale. While it is important to look for technology-based solutions to improve recycling/recovery activities, such solutions might not be necessarily affordable in many countries. A solution that involves the active participation of the population, on the other hand, has the potential to succeed in any country. The challenge is to attract and unite people to achieve such common goals. The theory of collective action and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, that have been originally used in resource management, are two concepts that can be adapted to organize recycling/recovery initiatives. This manuscript discusses what recycling/recovery programs can learn from the theory of collective action and the IAD framework, through a qualitative comparative study of such initiatives from three different cities. They are; Curitiba in Brazil, Padang in Indonesia, and Akure in Nigeria. The cases show the potential benefits of both concepts, not only in formulating and implementing recycling/recovery programs but also in making corrective measures for continuous improvements. All cases also showed the importance of increasing awareness-raising to change public perception towards waste from being a nuisance to a valuable resource. |
topic |
collective action institutional analysis and development framework waste policy waste governance waste management recycling and recovery circular economy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2313-4321/5/1/4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jinkyungoh collectiveactioninwastemanagementacomparativestudyofrecyclingandrecoveryinitiativesfrombrazilindonesiaandnigeriausingtheinstitutionalanalysisanddevelopmentframework AT hiroshanhettiarachchi collectiveactioninwastemanagementacomparativestudyofrecyclingandrecoveryinitiativesfrombrazilindonesiaandnigeriausingtheinstitutionalanalysisanddevelopmentframework |
_version_ |
1724690422974906368 |