Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial

Objective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammadreza Safavi, Azim Honarmand, Ashraf Sadat Sahafi, Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi, Mohammadali Attari, Mahsa Payandeh, Alireza Iazdani, Nilofarsaddat Norian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=Safavi
id doaj-8724fb3d307c4d1a9648d51e6b8e15eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8724fb3d307c4d1a9648d51e6b8e15eb2020-11-25T00:31:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Pharmacy Practice2319-96442279-042X2015-01-01414810.4103/2279-042X.150044Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trialMohammadreza SafaviAzim HonarmandAshraf Sadat SahafiSeyyed Mohammad SahafiMohammadali AttariMahsa PayandehAlireza IazdaniNilofarsaddat NorianObjective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of preemptive injection of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on pain alleviation on etomidate intravenous injection. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded trial study, 135 adult patients scheduled for elective outpatient or inpatient surgery were divided into three groups. Group M received 620 mg magnesium sulfate, Group L received 3 ml lidocaine 1% and Group S received normal saline, all in a volume of 5 mL followed by a maximal dose of 0.3 mg/kg of 1% etomidate. Pain was assessed on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain at the time of pretreatment and etomidate injection. Findings: About 60% of patients in the control group had pain during etomidate injection as compared to 22.2% and 40% in the lidocaine and magnesium sulfate groups, respectively. There was difference in induction pain score between three treatment groups, significantly (P = 0.01) and observed differences in pain scores between "normal saline and lidocaine group" (P < 0.001) and "normal saline and magnesium sulfate groups" were statistically meaningful (P = 0.044). Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium sulfate and lidocaine injection are comparably effective in reducing etomidate-induced pain.http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=SafaviEtomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammadreza Safavi
Azim Honarmand
Ashraf Sadat Sahafi
Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi
Mohammadali Attari
Mahsa Payandeh
Alireza Iazdani
Nilofarsaddat Norian
spellingShingle Mohammadreza Safavi
Azim Honarmand
Ashraf Sadat Sahafi
Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi
Mohammadali Attari
Mahsa Payandeh
Alireza Iazdani
Nilofarsaddat Norian
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Etomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention
author_facet Mohammadreza Safavi
Azim Honarmand
Ashraf Sadat Sahafi
Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi
Mohammadali Attari
Mahsa Payandeh
Alireza Iazdani
Nilofarsaddat Norian
author_sort Mohammadreza Safavi
title Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
title_short Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
title_full Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
title_fullStr Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
title_sort magnesium sulfate versus lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: a randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
issn 2319-9644
2279-042X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of preemptive injection of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on pain alleviation on etomidate intravenous injection. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded trial study, 135 adult patients scheduled for elective outpatient or inpatient surgery were divided into three groups. Group M received 620 mg magnesium sulfate, Group L received 3 ml lidocaine 1% and Group S received normal saline, all in a volume of 5 mL followed by a maximal dose of 0.3 mg/kg of 1% etomidate. Pain was assessed on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain at the time of pretreatment and etomidate injection. Findings: About 60% of patients in the control group had pain during etomidate injection as compared to 22.2% and 40% in the lidocaine and magnesium sulfate groups, respectively. There was difference in induction pain score between three treatment groups, significantly (P = 0.01) and observed differences in pain scores between "normal saline and lidocaine group" (P < 0.001) and "normal saline and magnesium sulfate groups" were statistically meaningful (P = 0.044). Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium sulfate and lidocaine injection are comparably effective in reducing etomidate-induced pain.
topic Etomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention
url http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=Safavi
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezasafavi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT azimhonarmand magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT ashrafsadatsahafi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT seyyedmohammadsahafi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mohammadaliattari magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mahsapayandeh magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT alirezaiazdani magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT nilofarsaddatnorian magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
_version_ 1725323821736525824