Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
Objective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=Safavi |
id |
doaj-8724fb3d307c4d1a9648d51e6b8e15eb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8724fb3d307c4d1a9648d51e6b8e15eb2020-11-25T00:31:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Pharmacy Practice2319-96442279-042X2015-01-01414810.4103/2279-042X.150044Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trialMohammadreza SafaviAzim HonarmandAshraf Sadat SahafiSeyyed Mohammad SahafiMohammadali AttariMahsa PayandehAlireza IazdaniNilofarsaddat NorianObjective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of preemptive injection of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on pain alleviation on etomidate intravenous injection. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded trial study, 135 adult patients scheduled for elective outpatient or inpatient surgery were divided into three groups. Group M received 620 mg magnesium sulfate, Group L received 3 ml lidocaine 1% and Group S received normal saline, all in a volume of 5 mL followed by a maximal dose of 0.3 mg/kg of 1% etomidate. Pain was assessed on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain at the time of pretreatment and etomidate injection. Findings: About 60% of patients in the control group had pain during etomidate injection as compared to 22.2% and 40% in the lidocaine and magnesium sulfate groups, respectively. There was difference in induction pain score between three treatment groups, significantly (P = 0.01) and observed differences in pain scores between "normal saline and lidocaine group" (P < 0.001) and "normal saline and magnesium sulfate groups" were statistically meaningful (P = 0.044). Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium sulfate and lidocaine injection are comparably effective in reducing etomidate-induced pain.http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=SafaviEtomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohammadreza Safavi Azim Honarmand Ashraf Sadat Sahafi Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi Mohammadali Attari Mahsa Payandeh Alireza Iazdani Nilofarsaddat Norian |
spellingShingle |
Mohammadreza Safavi Azim Honarmand Ashraf Sadat Sahafi Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi Mohammadali Attari Mahsa Payandeh Alireza Iazdani Nilofarsaddat Norian Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Etomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention |
author_facet |
Mohammadreza Safavi Azim Honarmand Ashraf Sadat Sahafi Seyyed Mohammad Sahafi Mohammadali Attari Mahsa Payandeh Alireza Iazdani Nilofarsaddat Norian |
author_sort |
Mohammadreza Safavi |
title |
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
title_short |
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
title_full |
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
title_sort |
magnesium sulfate versus lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: a randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice |
issn |
2319-9644 2279-042X |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Objective: Etomidate is an imidazole derivative and formulated in 35% propylene glycol. When given without a rapid lidocaine injection, etomidate is associated with pain after injection. Magnesium (Mg) is a calcium channel blocker and influences the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion channel. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency of preemptive injection of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on pain alleviation on etomidate intravenous injection.
Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded trial study, 135 adult patients scheduled for elective outpatient or inpatient surgery were divided into three groups. Group M received 620 mg magnesium sulfate, Group L received 3 ml lidocaine 1% and Group S received normal saline, all in a volume of 5 mL followed by a maximal dose of 0.3 mg/kg of 1% etomidate. Pain was assessed on a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain at the time of pretreatment and etomidate injection.
Findings: About 60% of patients in the control group had pain during etomidate injection as compared to 22.2% and 40% in the lidocaine and magnesium sulfate groups, respectively. There was difference in induction pain score between three treatment groups, significantly (P = 0.01) and observed differences in pain scores between "normal saline and lidocaine group" (P < 0.001) and "normal saline and magnesium sulfate groups" were statistically meaningful (P = 0.044).
Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium sulfate and lidocaine injection are comparably effective in reducing etomidate-induced pain. |
topic |
Etomidate; Lidocaine; Magnesium sulfate; pain; pretreatment; prevention |
url |
http://www.jrpp.net/article.asp?issn=2319-9644;year=2015;volume=4;issue=1;spage=4;epage=8;aulast=Safavi |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohammadrezasafavi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT azimhonarmand magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT ashrafsadatsahafi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT seyyedmohammadsahafi magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT mohammadaliattari magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT mahsapayandeh magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT alirezaiazdani magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT nilofarsaddatnorian magnesiumsulfateversuslidocainepretreatmentforpreventionofpainonetomidateinjectionarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725323821736525824 |