Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification

One of the central tenets of adaptive management is polycentric governance. Yet, despite the popularity of the concept, few detailed case studies of polycentric governance systems exist. In this paper, we aim to partly fill this gap. We describe water management between the years 1000 and 1953 on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erik Mostert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2012-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art12/
id doaj-86fd5ec4b92e4bc8a0709cbdcf52af9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86fd5ec4b92e4bc8a0709cbdcf52af9e2020-11-24T23:07:18ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872012-09-011731210.5751/ES-04956-1703124956Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and PetrificationErik Mostert0Delft University of TechnologyOne of the central tenets of adaptive management is polycentric governance. Yet, despite the popularity of the concept, few detailed case studies of polycentric governance systems exist. In this paper, we aim to partly fill this gap. We describe water management between the years 1000 and 1953 on the Dutch island of IJsselmonde in the Netherlands near Rotterdam, and then use this case to reflect on the theory of polycentric governance. Despite the small size of the island, water management on IJsselmonde was the responsibility of no fewer than 31 local jurisdictions and some 65 polders. In addition, some supra-local arrangements were made, such as joint supervision of dikes. According to the theory, such a polycentric system should have many advantages over more centralized management systems, and indeed there is some evidence of this. Yet, there is also evidence of a disadvantage that is not mentioned in the literature: petrification. IJsselmonde's water management system was often slow to adapt to changing conditions, and at times it provided an answer to yesterday's challenges rather than today's. We conclude that the theory of polycentric governance needs to be developed further because it now lumps together too many different systems under the heading of polycentric governance. This calls for more longitudinal case studies on the development and effectiveness of individual polycentric governance systems within their changing context.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art12/adaptive managementdrainageflood managementisland of IJsselmondeNetherlandspetrificationpolycentric governancewater resources management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erik Mostert
spellingShingle Erik Mostert
Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
Ecology and Society
adaptive management
drainage
flood management
island of IJsselmonde
Netherlands
petrification
polycentric governance
water resources management
author_facet Erik Mostert
author_sort Erik Mostert
title Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
title_short Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
title_full Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
title_fullStr Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
title_full_unstemmed Water Management on the Island of IJsselmonde 1000 to 1953: Polycentric Governance, Adaptation, and Petrification
title_sort water management on the island of ijsselmonde 1000 to 1953: polycentric governance, adaptation, and petrification
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2012-09-01
description One of the central tenets of adaptive management is polycentric governance. Yet, despite the popularity of the concept, few detailed case studies of polycentric governance systems exist. In this paper, we aim to partly fill this gap. We describe water management between the years 1000 and 1953 on the Dutch island of IJsselmonde in the Netherlands near Rotterdam, and then use this case to reflect on the theory of polycentric governance. Despite the small size of the island, water management on IJsselmonde was the responsibility of no fewer than 31 local jurisdictions and some 65 polders. In addition, some supra-local arrangements were made, such as joint supervision of dikes. According to the theory, such a polycentric system should have many advantages over more centralized management systems, and indeed there is some evidence of this. Yet, there is also evidence of a disadvantage that is not mentioned in the literature: petrification. IJsselmonde's water management system was often slow to adapt to changing conditions, and at times it provided an answer to yesterday's challenges rather than today's. We conclude that the theory of polycentric governance needs to be developed further because it now lumps together too many different systems under the heading of polycentric governance. This calls for more longitudinal case studies on the development and effectiveness of individual polycentric governance systems within their changing context.
topic adaptive management
drainage
flood management
island of IJsselmonde
Netherlands
petrification
polycentric governance
water resources management
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss3/art12/
work_keys_str_mv AT erikmostert watermanagementontheislandofijsselmonde1000to1953polycentricgovernanceadaptationandpetrification
_version_ 1716363326166925312