Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints

Limited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sampl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xue Yao, Wenli Liu, Junping Han, Guangqian Pei, Yigang Tong, Yaping Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=Yao
id doaj-86fc6799ec45410e9ca5e66cd99971fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86fc6799ec45410e9ca5e66cd99971fb2020-11-25T00:22:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Forensic Science and Medicine2349-50142016-01-0122747710.4103/2349-5014.184190Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm PrintsXue YaoWenli LiuJunping HanGuangqian PeiYigang TongYaping LuoLimited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sample collection, DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing, data were analyzed using the QIIME 1.8.0 software. Weighted unifrac distance between the right palm skin and the right side of a keyboard, the right palm skin and the mouse, and the left side of the keyboard and the left palm skin was 0.258850, 0.265474, and 0.214098, respectively. Even after palm prints were left for 1 week, microbial community structures were still quite similar to those of samples collected from the palm skin on the day they were left (weighted unifrac distance was 0.270885).http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=YaoCell phonekeyboardmetagenomicspalm prints
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xue Yao
Wenli Liu
Junping Han
Guangqian Pei
Yigang Tong
Yaping Luo
spellingShingle Xue Yao
Wenli Liu
Junping Han
Guangqian Pei
Yigang Tong
Yaping Luo
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine
Cell phone
keyboard
metagenomics
palm prints
author_facet Xue Yao
Wenli Liu
Junping Han
Guangqian Pei
Yigang Tong
Yaping Luo
author_sort Xue Yao
title Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
title_short Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
title_full Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
title_fullStr Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
title_sort analysis of microbiome dna on frequently touched items and from palm prints
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine
issn 2349-5014
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Limited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sample collection, DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing, data were analyzed using the QIIME 1.8.0 software. Weighted unifrac distance between the right palm skin and the right side of a keyboard, the right palm skin and the mouse, and the left side of the keyboard and the left palm skin was 0.258850, 0.265474, and 0.214098, respectively. Even after palm prints were left for 1 week, microbial community structures were still quite similar to those of samples collected from the palm skin on the day they were left (weighted unifrac distance was 0.270885).
topic Cell phone
keyboard
metagenomics
palm prints
url http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=Yao
work_keys_str_mv AT xueyao analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
AT wenliliu analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
AT junpinghan analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
AT guangqianpei analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
AT yigangtong analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
AT yapingluo analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints
_version_ 1725359433413820416