Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints
Limited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sampl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=Yao |
id |
doaj-86fc6799ec45410e9ca5e66cd99971fb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86fc6799ec45410e9ca5e66cd99971fb2020-11-25T00:22:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Forensic Science and Medicine2349-50142016-01-0122747710.4103/2349-5014.184190Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm PrintsXue YaoWenli LiuJunping HanGuangqian PeiYigang TongYaping LuoLimited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sample collection, DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing, data were analyzed using the QIIME 1.8.0 software. Weighted unifrac distance between the right palm skin and the right side of a keyboard, the right palm skin and the mouse, and the left side of the keyboard and the left palm skin was 0.258850, 0.265474, and 0.214098, respectively. Even after palm prints were left for 1 week, microbial community structures were still quite similar to those of samples collected from the palm skin on the day they were left (weighted unifrac distance was 0.270885).http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=YaoCell phonekeyboardmetagenomicspalm prints |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xue Yao Wenli Liu Junping Han Guangqian Pei Yigang Tong Yaping Luo |
spellingShingle |
Xue Yao Wenli Liu Junping Han Guangqian Pei Yigang Tong Yaping Luo Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine Cell phone keyboard metagenomics palm prints |
author_facet |
Xue Yao Wenli Liu Junping Han Guangqian Pei Yigang Tong Yaping Luo |
author_sort |
Xue Yao |
title |
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints |
title_short |
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints |
title_full |
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Microbiome DNA on Frequently Touched Items and from Palm Prints |
title_sort |
analysis of microbiome dna on frequently touched items and from palm prints |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine |
issn |
2349-5014 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Limited by the sensitivity of laboratory techniques, conventional human DNA analysis of touch DNA on frequently used items and prints does not always provide satisfactory results. In this study, microbiome DNA on personal computers, cell phones, and palm prints was analyzed and compared. After sample collection, DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing, data were analyzed using the QIIME 1.8.0 software. Weighted unifrac distance between the right palm skin and the right side of a keyboard, the right palm skin and the mouse, and the left side of the keyboard and the left palm skin was 0.258850, 0.265474, and 0.214098, respectively. Even after palm prints were left for 1 week, microbial community structures were still quite similar to those of samples collected from the palm skin on the day they were left (weighted unifrac distance was 0.270885). |
topic |
Cell phone keyboard metagenomics palm prints |
url |
http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=2;spage=74;epage=77;aulast=Yao |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xueyao analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints AT wenliliu analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints AT junpinghan analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints AT guangqianpei analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints AT yigangtong analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints AT yapingluo analysisofmicrobiomednaonfrequentlytoucheditemsandfrompalmprints |
_version_ |
1725359433413820416 |