Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
Background: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of advers...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2017-03-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open Medicine |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146 |
id |
doaj-86eece0ce54c4e21b7c7fdaec1bbf41f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86eece0ce54c4e21b7c7fdaec1bbf41f2020-11-25T01:20:38ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212017-03-01510.1177/205031211769914610.1177_2050312117699146Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patientsAlyssa Gallipani0A Scott Mathis1Hoytin Lee Ghin2Germin Fahim3Pharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Long Branch, NJ, USABackground: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of adverse effects between intravenous acetaminophen–treated and non-intravenous acetaminophen–treated patients. Primary safety endpoints included any adverse effect noted in the electronic medical record post-surgically. Secondary endpoints included changes in laboratory values, vital signs, and pain scores. Methods: This is a retrospective, matched, cohort study with data collected from electronic medical records. Adverse effects were collected from progress notes, nursing notes, and post-operative notes. Mean pain score was measured by the 11-point visual analog scale over a 72-h period. Results: A total of 609 patients who underwent a total hip or knee replacement were included. In all, 406 patients were treated with intravenous acetaminophen, and 203 patients received medication management without intravenous acetaminophen. More patients treated with intravenous acetaminophen experienced an adverse effect compared to patients who did not receive intravenous acetaminophen (91.63% versus 84.73%; p = 0.012). Mean cumulative acetaminophen exposure was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group (7704.89 ± 2558.6 versus 7260.1 ± 3016.09 mg; p = 0.07). Mean opioid use was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group as compared to the non-intravenous acetaminophen group (209.61 ± 555.09 versus 163.89 ± 232.44 mg; p = 0.152). Significantly higher mean pain scores were found in the intravenous acetaminophen group during the 72-h post-surgery period as compared with non-intravenous acetaminophen-treated patients. Conclusion: The increased utilization of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal pain management did not result in an improved safety or tolerability profile or reduced opioid utilization in orthopedic patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alyssa Gallipani A Scott Mathis Hoytin Lee Ghin Germin Fahim |
spellingShingle |
Alyssa Gallipani A Scott Mathis Hoytin Lee Ghin Germin Fahim Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients SAGE Open Medicine |
author_facet |
Alyssa Gallipani A Scott Mathis Hoytin Lee Ghin Germin Fahim |
author_sort |
Alyssa Gallipani |
title |
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
title_short |
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
title_full |
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
title_fullStr |
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
title_sort |
adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open Medicine |
issn |
2050-3121 |
publishDate |
2017-03-01 |
description |
Background: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of adverse effects between intravenous acetaminophen–treated and non-intravenous acetaminophen–treated patients. Primary safety endpoints included any adverse effect noted in the electronic medical record post-surgically. Secondary endpoints included changes in laboratory values, vital signs, and pain scores. Methods: This is a retrospective, matched, cohort study with data collected from electronic medical records. Adverse effects were collected from progress notes, nursing notes, and post-operative notes. Mean pain score was measured by the 11-point visual analog scale over a 72-h period. Results: A total of 609 patients who underwent a total hip or knee replacement were included. In all, 406 patients were treated with intravenous acetaminophen, and 203 patients received medication management without intravenous acetaminophen. More patients treated with intravenous acetaminophen experienced an adverse effect compared to patients who did not receive intravenous acetaminophen (91.63% versus 84.73%; p = 0.012). Mean cumulative acetaminophen exposure was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group (7704.89 ± 2558.6 versus 7260.1 ± 3016.09 mg; p = 0.07). Mean opioid use was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group as compared to the non-intravenous acetaminophen group (209.61 ± 555.09 versus 163.89 ± 232.44 mg; p = 0.152). Significantly higher mean pain scores were found in the intravenous acetaminophen group during the 72-h post-surgery period as compared with non-intravenous acetaminophen-treated patients. Conclusion: The increased utilization of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal pain management did not result in an improved safety or tolerability profile or reduced opioid utilization in orthopedic patients. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alyssagallipani adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients AT ascottmathis adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients AT hoytinleeghin adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients AT germinfahim adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients |
_version_ |
1725132966324076544 |