Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients

Background: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of advers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyssa Gallipani, A Scott Mathis, Hoytin Lee Ghin, Germin Fahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-03-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146
id doaj-86eece0ce54c4e21b7c7fdaec1bbf41f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86eece0ce54c4e21b7c7fdaec1bbf41f2020-11-25T01:20:38ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212017-03-01510.1177/205031211769914610.1177_2050312117699146Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patientsAlyssa Gallipani0A Scott Mathis1Hoytin Lee Ghin2Germin Fahim3Pharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USAPharmacy Department, Monmouth Medical Center, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Long Branch, NJ, USABackground: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of adverse effects between intravenous acetaminophen–treated and non-intravenous acetaminophen–treated patients. Primary safety endpoints included any adverse effect noted in the electronic medical record post-surgically. Secondary endpoints included changes in laboratory values, vital signs, and pain scores. Methods: This is a retrospective, matched, cohort study with data collected from electronic medical records. Adverse effects were collected from progress notes, nursing notes, and post-operative notes. Mean pain score was measured by the 11-point visual analog scale over a 72-h period. Results: A total of 609 patients who underwent a total hip or knee replacement were included. In all, 406 patients were treated with intravenous acetaminophen, and 203 patients received medication management without intravenous acetaminophen. More patients treated with intravenous acetaminophen experienced an adverse effect compared to patients who did not receive intravenous acetaminophen (91.63% versus 84.73%; p = 0.012). Mean cumulative acetaminophen exposure was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group (7704.89 ± 2558.6 versus 7260.1 ± 3016.09 mg; p = 0.07). Mean opioid use was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group as compared to the non-intravenous acetaminophen group (209.61 ± 555.09 versus 163.89 ± 232.44 mg; p = 0.152). Significantly higher mean pain scores were found in the intravenous acetaminophen group during the 72-h post-surgery period as compared with non-intravenous acetaminophen-treated patients. Conclusion: The increased utilization of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal pain management did not result in an improved safety or tolerability profile or reduced opioid utilization in orthopedic patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alyssa Gallipani
A Scott Mathis
Hoytin Lee Ghin
Germin Fahim
spellingShingle Alyssa Gallipani
A Scott Mathis
Hoytin Lee Ghin
Germin Fahim
Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Alyssa Gallipani
A Scott Mathis
Hoytin Lee Ghin
Germin Fahim
author_sort Alyssa Gallipani
title Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
title_short Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
title_full Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
title_fullStr Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
title_full_unstemmed Adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
title_sort adverse effect profile comparison of pain regimens with and without intravenous acetaminophen in total hip and knee arthroplasty patients
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Background: The use of adjunct, non-opioid agents is integral for pain control following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Literature comparing safety profiles of intravenous acetaminophen versus opioids is lacking. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and type of adverse effects between intravenous acetaminophen–treated and non-intravenous acetaminophen–treated patients. Primary safety endpoints included any adverse effect noted in the electronic medical record post-surgically. Secondary endpoints included changes in laboratory values, vital signs, and pain scores. Methods: This is a retrospective, matched, cohort study with data collected from electronic medical records. Adverse effects were collected from progress notes, nursing notes, and post-operative notes. Mean pain score was measured by the 11-point visual analog scale over a 72-h period. Results: A total of 609 patients who underwent a total hip or knee replacement were included. In all, 406 patients were treated with intravenous acetaminophen, and 203 patients received medication management without intravenous acetaminophen. More patients treated with intravenous acetaminophen experienced an adverse effect compared to patients who did not receive intravenous acetaminophen (91.63% versus 84.73%; p = 0.012). Mean cumulative acetaminophen exposure was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group (7704.89 ± 2558.6 versus 7260.1 ± 3016.09 mg; p = 0.07). Mean opioid use was similar in the intravenous acetaminophen group as compared to the non-intravenous acetaminophen group (209.61 ± 555.09 versus 163.89 ± 232.44 mg; p = 0.152). Significantly higher mean pain scores were found in the intravenous acetaminophen group during the 72-h post-surgery period as compared with non-intravenous acetaminophen-treated patients. Conclusion: The increased utilization of intravenous acetaminophen in multimodal pain management did not result in an improved safety or tolerability profile or reduced opioid utilization in orthopedic patients.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312117699146
work_keys_str_mv AT alyssagallipani adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients
AT ascottmathis adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients
AT hoytinleeghin adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients
AT germinfahim adverseeffectprofilecomparisonofpainregimenswithandwithoutintravenousacetaminophenintotalhipandkneearthroplastypatients
_version_ 1725132966324076544