Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica

Seeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DAL GOBBO, ALICE, LEONARDI, EMANUELE
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it 2019-06-01
Series:S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdf
id doaj-86e8d9dd75574505a2c21aef909de4dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86e8d9dd75574505a2c21aef909de4dc2020-11-25T00:20:50ZengS&F_scienzaefilosofia.itS&F_scienzaefilosofia.it2036-29272019-06-0121138153Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica DAL GOBBO, ALICE0LEONARDI, EMANUELE1Università di TrentoUniversidade de CoimbraSeeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology has moved to it, we reflect upon its narrative’s blindspots and find that they can be seen as a symptom of a more general impasse of the neoliberal governance of nature and of the ecologic crisis. On the one hand, the narrative of the Anthropocene brings about a poshumanist vision that potentially decentres anthropocentrism. On the other, this same possibility becomes vehicle for increasingly profound and less reflexive intervetions by human beings on the biosphere, in particular via technoscientific develpments. This paradox seems to respond to a specifically capitalist necessity of valorising “Nature”, while not being conducive to concrete solutions to the ecologic crisis. But if we are first able to see the Anthropocene in the present historical phase, and thanks to specific kinds of knowledge that emerge now – then the very issue of knowledge is central to inventing new and more ecological ways of (re)embedding ourselves in the world. What ways of knowing can comprehend the emancipatory characters of the posthumanist implications of the Anthropocene and at the same time avoid tendencies towards the domination of the biosphere?http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdfanthropoceneecologyscience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author DAL GOBBO, ALICE
LEONARDI, EMANUELE
spellingShingle DAL GOBBO, ALICE
LEONARDI, EMANUELE
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
anthropocene
ecology
science
author_facet DAL GOBBO, ALICE
LEONARDI, EMANUELE
author_sort DAL GOBBO, ALICE
title Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
title_short Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
title_full Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
title_fullStr Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
title_full_unstemmed Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
title_sort vedere l’antropocene, immaginare futuri. note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
publisher S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
series S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
issn 2036-2927
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Seeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology has moved to it, we reflect upon its narrative’s blindspots and find that they can be seen as a symptom of a more general impasse of the neoliberal governance of nature and of the ecologic crisis. On the one hand, the narrative of the Anthropocene brings about a poshumanist vision that potentially decentres anthropocentrism. On the other, this same possibility becomes vehicle for increasingly profound and less reflexive intervetions by human beings on the biosphere, in particular via technoscientific develpments. This paradox seems to respond to a specifically capitalist necessity of valorising “Nature”, while not being conducive to concrete solutions to the ecologic crisis. But if we are first able to see the Anthropocene in the present historical phase, and thanks to specific kinds of knowledge that emerge now – then the very issue of knowledge is central to inventing new and more ecological ways of (re)embedding ourselves in the world. What ways of knowing can comprehend the emancipatory characters of the posthumanist implications of the Anthropocene and at the same time avoid tendencies towards the domination of the biosphere?
topic anthropocene
ecology
science
url http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dalgobboalice vederelantropoceneimmaginarefuturinoteperunpensierocriticodellacrisiecologica
AT leonardiemanuele vederelantropoceneimmaginarefuturinoteperunpensierocriticodellacrisiecologica
_version_ 1725365577010118656