Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica
Seeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology ha...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
2019-06-01
|
Series: | S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdf |
id |
doaj-86e8d9dd75574505a2c21aef909de4dc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86e8d9dd75574505a2c21aef909de4dc2020-11-25T00:20:50ZengS&F_scienzaefilosofia.itS&F_scienzaefilosofia.it2036-29272019-06-0121138153Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica DAL GOBBO, ALICE0LEONARDI, EMANUELE1Università di TrentoUniversidade de CoimbraSeeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology has moved to it, we reflect upon its narrative’s blindspots and find that they can be seen as a symptom of a more general impasse of the neoliberal governance of nature and of the ecologic crisis. On the one hand, the narrative of the Anthropocene brings about a poshumanist vision that potentially decentres anthropocentrism. On the other, this same possibility becomes vehicle for increasingly profound and less reflexive intervetions by human beings on the biosphere, in particular via technoscientific develpments. This paradox seems to respond to a specifically capitalist necessity of valorising “Nature”, while not being conducive to concrete solutions to the ecologic crisis. But if we are first able to see the Anthropocene in the present historical phase, and thanks to specific kinds of knowledge that emerge now – then the very issue of knowledge is central to inventing new and more ecological ways of (re)embedding ourselves in the world. What ways of knowing can comprehend the emancipatory characters of the posthumanist implications of the Anthropocene and at the same time avoid tendencies towards the domination of the biosphere?http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdfanthropoceneecologyscience |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
DAL GOBBO, ALICE LEONARDI, EMANUELE |
spellingShingle |
DAL GOBBO, ALICE LEONARDI, EMANUELE Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it anthropocene ecology science |
author_facet |
DAL GOBBO, ALICE LEONARDI, EMANUELE |
author_sort |
DAL GOBBO, ALICE |
title |
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
title_short |
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
title_full |
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
title_fullStr |
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vedere l’Antropocene, immaginare futuri. Note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
title_sort |
vedere l’antropocene, immaginare futuri. note per un pensiero critico della crisi ecologica |
publisher |
S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it |
series |
S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it |
issn |
2036-2927 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Seeing the Anthropocene, imagining Futures. Notes towards a critical Thinking of the ecologic Crisis
The Anthropocene discourse has rapidly become popular and common to very diverse kinds of knowledge. It is nonetheless a very contested category. Starting from the critique that political ecology has moved to it, we reflect upon its narrative’s blindspots and find that they can be seen as a symptom of a more general impasse of the neoliberal governance of nature and of the ecologic crisis. On the one hand, the narrative of the Anthropocene brings about a poshumanist vision that potentially decentres anthropocentrism. On the other, this same possibility becomes vehicle for increasingly profound and less reflexive intervetions by human beings on the biosphere, in particular via technoscientific develpments. This paradox seems to respond to a specifically capitalist necessity of valorising “Nature”, while not being conducive to concrete solutions to the ecologic crisis. But if we are first able to see the Anthropocene in the present historical phase, and thanks to specific kinds of knowledge that emerge now – then the very issue of knowledge is central to inventing new and more ecological ways of (re)embedding ourselves in the world. What ways of knowing can comprehend the emancipatory characters of the posthumanist implications of the Anthropocene and at the same time avoid tendencies towards the domination of the biosphere? |
topic |
anthropocene ecology science |
url |
http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/21-09-DALGOBBO-LEONARDI.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dalgobboalice vederelantropoceneimmaginarefuturinoteperunpensierocriticodellacrisiecologica AT leonardiemanuele vederelantropoceneimmaginarefuturinoteperunpensierocriticodellacrisiecologica |
_version_ |
1725365577010118656 |