Nuclear receptors from the ctenophore <it>Mnemiopsis leidyi </it>lack a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain: lineage-specific loss or ancestral condition in the emergence of the nuclear receptor superfamily?

• Main Authors: Reitzel Adam M, Pang Kevin, Ryan Joseph F, Mullikin James C, Martindale Mark Q, Baxevanis Andreas D, Tarrant Ann M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2011-02-01
• Series: EvoDevo
• Online Access: http://www.evodevojournal.com/content/2/1/3

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Nuclear receptors (NRs) are an ancient superfamily of metazoan transcription factors that play critical roles in regulation of reproduction, development, and energetic homeostasis. Although the evolutionary relationships among NRs are well-described in two prominent clades of animals (deuterostomes and protostomes), comparatively little information has been reported on the diversity of NRs in early diverging metazoans. Here, we identified NRs from the phylum Ctenophora and used a phylogenomic approach to explore the emergence of the NR superfamily in the animal kingdom. In addition, to gain insight into conserved or novel functions, we examined NR expression during ctenophore development.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We report the first described NRs from the phylum Ctenophora: two from <it>Mnemiopsis leidyi </it>and one from <it>Pleurobrachia pileus</it>. All ctenophore NRs contained a ligand-binding domain and grouped with NRs from the subfamily NR2A (<it>HNF4</it>). Surprisingly, all the ctenophore NRs lacked the highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD). NRs from <it>Mnemiopsis </it>were expressed in different regions of developing ctenophores. One was broadly expressed in the endoderm during gastrulation. The second was initially expressed in the ectoderm during gastrulation, in regions corresponding to the future tentacles; subsequent expression was restricted to the apical organ. Phylogenetic analyses of NRs from ctenophores, sponges, cnidarians, and a placozoan support the hypothesis that expansion of the superfamily occurred in a step-wise fashion, with initial radiations in NR family 2, followed by representatives of NR families 3, 6, and 1/4 originating prior to the appearance of the bilaterian ancestor.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study provides the first description of NRs from ctenophores, including the full complement from <it>Mnemiopsis</it>. Ctenophores have the least diverse NR complement of any animal phylum with representatives that cluster with only one subfamily (NR2A). Ctenophores and sponges have a similarly restricted NR complement supporting the hypothesis that the original NR was <it>HNF4</it>-like and that these lineages are the first two branches from the animal tree. The absence of a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain in the two ctenophore species suggests two hypotheses: this domain may have been secondarily lost within the ctenophore lineage or, if ctenophores are the first branch off the animal tree, the original NR may have lacked the canonical DBD. Phylogenomic analyses and categorization of NRs from all four early diverging animal phyla compared with the complement from bilaterians suggest the rate of NR diversification prior to the cnidarian-bilaterian split was relatively modest, with independent radiations of several NR subfamilies within the cnidarian lineage.</p>