Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood

The St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lisa Matthewson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linguistic Society of America 2010-08-01
Series:Semantics and Pragmatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://semprag.org/article/view/114
id doaj-86b9fcd5a3394d10a28b326ee4c3013c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86b9fcd5a3394d10a28b326ee4c3013c2020-11-24T21:23:12ZengLinguistic Society of AmericaSemantics and Pragmatics1937-89122010-08-013017410.3765/sp.3.9992Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of moodLisa Matthewson0UBCThe St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'imcets subjunctive also differs from Indo-European subjunctives in that it is not selected by attitude verbs. In this paper I account for the St'át'imcets subjunctive using Portner's (1997) proposal that moods restrict the conversational background of a governing modal. I argue that the St'át'imcets subjunctive restricts the conversational background of a governing modal, but in a way which obligatorily weakens the modal’s force. This obligatory modal weakening -- not found with Indo-European non-indicative moods -- correlates with the fact that St'át'imcets modals differ from Indo-European modals along the same dimension. While Indo-European modals typically lexically encode quantificational force, but leave conversational background to context, St'át'imcets modals encode conversational background, but leave quantificational force to context (Matthewson, Rullmann & Davis 2007, Rullmann, Matthewson & Davis 2008). doi:10.3765/sp.3.9 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/matthewson-2010.bib">BibTeX info</a>http://semprag.org/article/view/114subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa Matthewson
spellingShingle Lisa Matthewson
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
Semantics and Pragmatics
subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish
author_facet Lisa Matthewson
author_sort Lisa Matthewson
title Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
title_short Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
title_full Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
title_fullStr Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
title_full_unstemmed Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
title_sort cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: the role of mood
publisher Linguistic Society of America
series Semantics and Pragmatics
issn 1937-8912
publishDate 2010-08-01
description The St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'imcets subjunctive also differs from Indo-European subjunctives in that it is not selected by attitude verbs. In this paper I account for the St'át'imcets subjunctive using Portner's (1997) proposal that moods restrict the conversational background of a governing modal. I argue that the St'át'imcets subjunctive restricts the conversational background of a governing modal, but in a way which obligatorily weakens the modal’s force. This obligatory modal weakening -- not found with Indo-European non-indicative moods -- correlates with the fact that St'át'imcets modals differ from Indo-European modals along the same dimension. While Indo-European modals typically lexically encode quantificational force, but leave conversational background to context, St'át'imcets modals encode conversational background, but leave quantificational force to context (Matthewson, Rullmann & Davis 2007, Rullmann, Matthewson & Davis 2008). doi:10.3765/sp.3.9 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/matthewson-2010.bib">BibTeX info</a>
topic subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish
url http://semprag.org/article/view/114
work_keys_str_mv AT lisamatthewson crosslinguisticvariationinmodalitysystemstheroleofmood
_version_ 1725993106068733952