Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood
The St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Linguistic Society of America
2010-08-01
|
Series: | Semantics and Pragmatics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://semprag.org/article/view/114 |
id |
doaj-86b9fcd5a3394d10a28b326ee4c3013c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-86b9fcd5a3394d10a28b326ee4c3013c2020-11-24T21:23:12ZengLinguistic Society of AmericaSemantics and Pragmatics1937-89122010-08-013017410.3765/sp.3.9992Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of moodLisa Matthewson0UBCThe St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'imcets subjunctive also differs from Indo-European subjunctives in that it is not selected by attitude verbs. In this paper I account for the St'át'imcets subjunctive using Portner's (1997) proposal that moods restrict the conversational background of a governing modal. I argue that the St'át'imcets subjunctive restricts the conversational background of a governing modal, but in a way which obligatorily weakens the modal’s force. This obligatory modal weakening -- not found with Indo-European non-indicative moods -- correlates with the fact that St'át'imcets modals differ from Indo-European modals along the same dimension. While Indo-European modals typically lexically encode quantificational force, but leave conversational background to context, St'át'imcets modals encode conversational background, but leave quantificational force to context (Matthewson, Rullmann & Davis 2007, Rullmann, Matthewson & Davis 2008). doi:10.3765/sp.3.9 <a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/matthewson-2010.bib">BibTeX info</a>http://semprag.org/article/view/114subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lisa Matthewson |
spellingShingle |
Lisa Matthewson Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood Semantics and Pragmatics subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish |
author_facet |
Lisa Matthewson |
author_sort |
Lisa Matthewson |
title |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
title_short |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
title_full |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
title_fullStr |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
title_sort |
cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: the role of mood |
publisher |
Linguistic Society of America |
series |
Semantics and Pragmatics |
issn |
1937-8912 |
publishDate |
2010-08-01 |
description |
The St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) subjunctive mood appears in nine distinct environments, with a range of semantic effects, including weakening an imperative to a polite request, turning a question into an uncertainty statement, and creating an ignorance free relative. The St'át'imcets subjunctive also differs from Indo-European subjunctives in that it is not selected by attitude verbs. In this paper I account for the St'át'imcets subjunctive using Portner's (1997) proposal that moods restrict the conversational background of a governing modal. I argue that the St'át'imcets subjunctive restricts the conversational background of a governing modal, but in a way which obligatorily weakens the modal’s force. This obligatory modal weakening -- not found with Indo-European non-indicative moods -- correlates with the fact that St'át'imcets modals differ from Indo-European modals along the same dimension. While Indo-European modals typically lexically encode quantificational force, but leave conversational background to context, St'át'imcets modals encode conversational background, but leave quantificational force to context (Matthewson, Rullmann & Davis 2007, Rullmann, Matthewson & Davis 2008).
doi:10.3765/sp.3.9
<a href="http://semantics-online.org/sp-bib/matthewson-2010.bib">BibTeX info</a> |
topic |
subjunctive, mood, irrealis, modals, imperatives, evidentials, questions, free relatives, attitude verbs, Salish |
url |
http://semprag.org/article/view/114 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lisamatthewson crosslinguisticvariationinmodalitysystemstheroleofmood |
_version_ |
1725993106068733952 |