Aristotle’s Secundum quid and Accident fallacies. Their fore-predicative interpretation and illustration by division
Through the recognition of the principle of distinction and its fore-predicative implications the extra-linguistic fallacies of secundum quid and accident, proposed by Aristotle in the Sophistici Elenchi, will be explained, proved, analyzed and solved. Thus, it is postulated that the fallacies prese...
Main Author: | Álvaro Andrés Ledesma Albornoz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/55649 |
Similar Items
-
El razonamiento sofístico (privado) y la teoría de los predicables
by: José Miguel Gambra
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Without Qualification: An Inquiry Into the Secundum Quid
by: Botting David
Published: (2014-03-01) -
Algunas notas sobre la discusión con los eléatas en Física I de Aristóteles
by: Gabriela Rossi
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof
by: Douglas Walton, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Argumentación y Falacias en Aristóteles
by: Mauricio Beuchot
Published: (2013-11-01)