Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
This paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Urban Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24 |
id |
doaj-866f8067dae543e58c05b7a3b5810204 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-866f8067dae543e58c05b7a3b58102042021-02-27T00:02:15ZengMDPI AGUrban Science2413-88512021-02-015242410.3390/urbansci5010024Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan AmericaGordon F. Mulligan0John I. Carruthers1School of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USADepartment of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USAThis paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected by both human and natural amenities and employment by wages, patents, and other attributes of the workforce. This paper questions the conventional interpretation of the adjustment process by using geographically weighted regression (GWR) instead of standard linear (OLS, 2GLS) regression. Here the various estimates are all local, so the long-run equilibrium solutions for the adjustment process vary over space. Convergence no longer indicates a stable universal solution but instead involves a mix of stable and unstable local solutions. Local sustainability becomes an issue when making projections because employment can quickly lead or lag population in some metropolitan labor markets.https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24adjustmentpopulation and employmentregressionstable and unstable local solutionslocal sustainability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gordon F. Mulligan John I. Carruthers |
spellingShingle |
Gordon F. Mulligan John I. Carruthers Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America Urban Science adjustment population and employment regression stable and unstable local solutions local sustainability |
author_facet |
Gordon F. Mulligan John I. Carruthers |
author_sort |
Gordon F. Mulligan |
title |
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America |
title_short |
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America |
title_full |
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America |
title_fullStr |
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America |
title_sort |
location-specific adjustments in population and employment across metropolitan america |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Urban Science |
issn |
2413-8851 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
This paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected by both human and natural amenities and employment by wages, patents, and other attributes of the workforce. This paper questions the conventional interpretation of the adjustment process by using geographically weighted regression (GWR) instead of standard linear (OLS, 2GLS) regression. Here the various estimates are all local, so the long-run equilibrium solutions for the adjustment process vary over space. Convergence no longer indicates a stable universal solution but instead involves a mix of stable and unstable local solutions. Local sustainability becomes an issue when making projections because employment can quickly lead or lag population in some metropolitan labor markets. |
topic |
adjustment population and employment regression stable and unstable local solutions local sustainability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gordonfmulligan locationspecificadjustmentsinpopulationandemploymentacrossmetropolitanamerica AT johnicarruthers locationspecificadjustmentsinpopulationandemploymentacrossmetropolitanamerica |
_version_ |
1724248832589430784 |