Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America

This paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gordon F. Mulligan, John I. Carruthers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Urban Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24
id doaj-866f8067dae543e58c05b7a3b5810204
record_format Article
spelling doaj-866f8067dae543e58c05b7a3b58102042021-02-27T00:02:15ZengMDPI AGUrban Science2413-88512021-02-015242410.3390/urbansci5010024Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan AmericaGordon F. Mulligan0John I. Carruthers1School of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USADepartment of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USAThis paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected by both human and natural amenities and employment by wages, patents, and other attributes of the workforce. This paper questions the conventional interpretation of the adjustment process by using geographically weighted regression (GWR) instead of standard linear (OLS, 2GLS) regression. Here the various estimates are all local, so the long-run equilibrium solutions for the adjustment process vary over space. Convergence no longer indicates a stable universal solution but instead involves a mix of stable and unstable local solutions. Local sustainability becomes an issue when making projections because employment can quickly lead or lag population in some metropolitan labor markets.https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24adjustmentpopulation and employmentregressionstable and unstable local solutionslocal sustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gordon F. Mulligan
John I. Carruthers
spellingShingle Gordon F. Mulligan
John I. Carruthers
Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
Urban Science
adjustment
population and employment
regression
stable and unstable local solutions
local sustainability
author_facet Gordon F. Mulligan
John I. Carruthers
author_sort Gordon F. Mulligan
title Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
title_short Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
title_full Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
title_fullStr Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
title_full_unstemmed Location-Specific Adjustments in Population and Employment across Metropolitan America
title_sort location-specific adjustments in population and employment across metropolitan america
publisher MDPI AG
series Urban Science
issn 2413-8851
publishDate 2021-02-01
description This paper examines the joint adjustment of population and employment numbers across America’s metropolitan areas during the period 1990–2015. Current levels of both are estimated, for 10 year periods, using their lagged (own and cross) levels and eight other lagged variables. Population is affected by both human and natural amenities and employment by wages, patents, and other attributes of the workforce. This paper questions the conventional interpretation of the adjustment process by using geographically weighted regression (GWR) instead of standard linear (OLS, 2GLS) regression. Here the various estimates are all local, so the long-run equilibrium solutions for the adjustment process vary over space. Convergence no longer indicates a stable universal solution but instead involves a mix of stable and unstable local solutions. Local sustainability becomes an issue when making projections because employment can quickly lead or lag population in some metropolitan labor markets.
topic adjustment
population and employment
regression
stable and unstable local solutions
local sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/5/1/24
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonfmulligan locationspecificadjustmentsinpopulationandemploymentacrossmetropolitanamerica
AT johnicarruthers locationspecificadjustmentsinpopulationandemploymentacrossmetropolitanamerica
_version_ 1724248832589430784