Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study

Abstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Severina Leu, Florian Halbeisen, Luigi Mariani, Jehuda Soleman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5
id doaj-86682fa365a24ac1af686177491dc368
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86682fa365a24ac1af686177491dc3682021-05-23T11:31:11ZengBMCTrials1745-62152021-05-0122111210.1186/s13063-021-05306-5Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled studySeverina Leu0Florian Halbeisen1Luigi Mariani2Jehuda Soleman3Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of BaselBasel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University Hospital of BaselDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of BaselDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of BaselAbstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery can increase the risk for VPS complications, especially infections. The position of the proximal ventricular catheter influences shunt functioning and survival. With freehand placement, rates of malpositioned VPS are still high. Several navigation techniques for improvement of shunt placement have been developed. Studies comparing these techniques are sparse. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare ultrasound (US) guided to stereotactic navigated shunt placement using optical tracking with the focus on operation time and efficiency. Methods In this prospective randomised, single-centre, partially-blinded study, we will include all patients undergoing VPS placement in our clinic. The patients will be randomised into two groups, one group undergoing US-guided (US-G) and the other group stereotactic navigated VPS placement using optical tracking. The primary outcome will be the surgical intervention time. This time span consists of the surgical preparation time together with the operation time and is given in minutes. Secondary outcomes will be accuracy of catheter positioning, VPS dysfunction and need for revision surgery, total operation and anaesthesia times, and amount of intraoperative ventricular puncture attempts as well as complications, any morbidity and mortality. Discussion To date, there is no prospective data available comparing these two navigation techniques. A randomised controlled study is urgently needed in order to provide class I evidence for the best possible surgical technique of this frequent surgery. Trial registration Business Administration System for Ethical Committees (BASEC) 2019-02157, registered on 21 November 2019, https://www.kofam.ch/de/studienportal/suche/88135/studie/49552 ; clinicalTrials.gov: NCT04450797 , registered on 30 June 2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5Ventriculoperitoneal shuntUltrasoundStereotaxic techniquesHydrocephalusSurgical techniqueRandomised controlled trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Severina Leu
Florian Halbeisen
Luigi Mariani
Jehuda Soleman
spellingShingle Severina Leu
Florian Halbeisen
Luigi Mariani
Jehuda Soleman
Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
Trials
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Ultrasound
Stereotaxic techniques
Hydrocephalus
Surgical technique
Randomised controlled trial
author_facet Severina Leu
Florian Halbeisen
Luigi Mariani
Jehuda Soleman
author_sort Severina Leu
title Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_short Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_full Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
title_sort intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures and the operation is performed in a highly standardised manner under maintenance of highest infection precautions. Short operation times are important since longer duration of surgery can increase the risk for VPS complications, especially infections. The position of the proximal ventricular catheter influences shunt functioning and survival. With freehand placement, rates of malpositioned VPS are still high. Several navigation techniques for improvement of shunt placement have been developed. Studies comparing these techniques are sparse. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare ultrasound (US) guided to stereotactic navigated shunt placement using optical tracking with the focus on operation time and efficiency. Methods In this prospective randomised, single-centre, partially-blinded study, we will include all patients undergoing VPS placement in our clinic. The patients will be randomised into two groups, one group undergoing US-guided (US-G) and the other group stereotactic navigated VPS placement using optical tracking. The primary outcome will be the surgical intervention time. This time span consists of the surgical preparation time together with the operation time and is given in minutes. Secondary outcomes will be accuracy of catheter positioning, VPS dysfunction and need for revision surgery, total operation and anaesthesia times, and amount of intraoperative ventricular puncture attempts as well as complications, any morbidity and mortality. Discussion To date, there is no prospective data available comparing these two navigation techniques. A randomised controlled study is urgently needed in order to provide class I evidence for the best possible surgical technique of this frequent surgery. Trial registration Business Administration System for Ethical Committees (BASEC) 2019-02157, registered on 21 November 2019, https://www.kofam.ch/de/studienportal/suche/88135/studie/49552 ; clinicalTrials.gov: NCT04450797 , registered on 30 June 2020.
topic Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Ultrasound
Stereotaxic techniques
Hydrocephalus
Surgical technique
Randomised controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5
work_keys_str_mv AT severinaleu intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT florianhalbeisen intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT luigimariani intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT jehudasoleman intraoperativeultrasoundguidedcomparedtostereotacticnavigatedventriculoperitonealshuntplacementstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1721429702424395776