The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to explore the possible differences in the working memory of monolingual (Persian) and bilingual  (Persian-Baluchi) children. We wanted to examine if there is a statistically significant relationship between working memory and bilingualism. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faezeh Asadollahpour, Kowsar Baghban, Parisa Mirbalouchzehi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Negah Institute for Scientific Communication 2015-09-01
Series:Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-430-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-86579d1a0ac44bdc993adffefa31f7b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86579d1a0ac44bdc993adffefa31f7b12020-11-24T23:14:23ZengNegah Institute for Scientific CommunicationIranian Rehabilitation Journal 1735-36021735-36102015-09-011335458The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory TasksFaezeh Asadollahpour0Kowsar Baghban1Parisa Mirbalouchzehi2 Department of Speech Therapy, Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Department of Speech Therapy, Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. Objectives: The purpose of this research was to explore the possible differences in the working memory of monolingual (Persian) and bilingual&nbsp; (Persian-Baluchi) children. We wanted to examine if there is a statistically significant relationship between working memory and bilingualism. Methods: Four working memory (WM) tests, assessing three WM components, were administered to 140 second grade school students, of whom 70 were&nbsp; monolinguals (35 girls and 35 boys) and 70 were bilinguals (35 girls and 35 boys). The tests used are the following: Forward Digit Span Test, Backward Digit Span Test, Non Word Repetition Test, Maze Memory Test. The results of the two groups were analyzed with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, aiming to find out any differences in the working memory function of bilingual and monolingual children, and to determine which group has an advantage. Results: The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to measure various WM factors across the two language groups. The findings showed that there were significant language effects on Forward and Backward Digit Span and Non Word Repetition Task (P<0.001), and no significant language effects on Maze Memory (P>0.001). Discussion: This study revealed that bilingual children had a better WM, which holds processes and updates information over short periods of time, than monolingual children.http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-430-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1Working memory Bilingual Monolingual
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Faezeh Asadollahpour
Kowsar Baghban
Parisa Mirbalouchzehi
spellingShingle Faezeh Asadollahpour
Kowsar Baghban
Parisa Mirbalouchzehi
The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Working memory
Bilingual
Monolingual
author_facet Faezeh Asadollahpour
Kowsar Baghban
Parisa Mirbalouchzehi
author_sort Faezeh Asadollahpour
title The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
title_short The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
title_full The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
title_fullStr The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Bilingual and Monolingual Children on Working Memory Tasks
title_sort performance of bilingual and monolingual children on working memory tasks
publisher Negah Institute for Scientific Communication
series Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
issn 1735-3602
1735-3610
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Objectives: The purpose of this research was to explore the possible differences in the working memory of monolingual (Persian) and bilingual&nbsp; (Persian-Baluchi) children. We wanted to examine if there is a statistically significant relationship between working memory and bilingualism. Methods: Four working memory (WM) tests, assessing three WM components, were administered to 140 second grade school students, of whom 70 were&nbsp; monolinguals (35 girls and 35 boys) and 70 were bilinguals (35 girls and 35 boys). The tests used are the following: Forward Digit Span Test, Backward Digit Span Test, Non Word Repetition Test, Maze Memory Test. The results of the two groups were analyzed with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, aiming to find out any differences in the working memory function of bilingual and monolingual children, and to determine which group has an advantage. Results: The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to measure various WM factors across the two language groups. The findings showed that there were significant language effects on Forward and Backward Digit Span and Non Word Repetition Task (P<0.001), and no significant language effects on Maze Memory (P>0.001). Discussion: This study revealed that bilingual children had a better WM, which holds processes and updates information over short periods of time, than monolingual children.
topic Working memory
Bilingual
Monolingual
url http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-430-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT faezehasadollahpour theperformanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
AT kowsarbaghban theperformanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
AT parisamirbalouchzehi theperformanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
AT faezehasadollahpour performanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
AT kowsarbaghban performanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
AT parisamirbalouchzehi performanceofbilingualandmonolingualchildrenonworkingmemorytasks
_version_ 1725594541873954816