Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions (BL) using 2 stents technique is known to be associated with high rates of procedural failure especially on the side branch (SB) mainly due to stent incomplete apposition. Stent deployment at very high pressure (SDHP) may l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoine Gerbay, Jeremy Terreaux, Alexis Cerisier, Marco Vola, Karl Isaaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216301663
id doaj-86575768c9f54a218d2510e095a5433f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-86575768c9f54a218d2510e095a5433f2020-11-24T23:14:23ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322017-01-01691323610.1016/j.ihj.2016.05.013Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experienceAntoine GerbayJeremy TerreauxAlexis CerisierMarco VolaKarl IsaazBackground: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions (BL) using 2 stents technique is known to be associated with high rates of procedural failure especially on the side branch (SB) mainly due to stent incomplete apposition. Stent deployment at very high pressure (SDHP) may lead to better stent expansion and apposition. However, SDHP may also be at the origin of deeper wall injury resulting into major cardiac adverse events. No data are available on evaluation of SDHP in BL treated by a mini-crush stent technique. Methods: One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients underwent PCI for BL (Medina 1, 1, 1) using a mini-crush stent technique with SDHP defined as ≥20 atm. An angiographic follow-up was performed at 6 month and clinical follow-up was obtained at a median of 3 years. Results: Stent deployment mean pressures were 20 ± 1.4 atm (range 20–25) in the main vessel (MV) and 20 ± 1.5 atm (range 20–25) in SB. Simultaneous final kissing balloon was used in 92% of cases. PCI was successful in 100%. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 83% of patients. Restenosis rate was 13% (12% restenosis in the SB) with only one case (0.8%) of SB probable thrombosis. Another case of late stent thrombosis occurred at a 3 years clinical follow-up. Conclusion: Compared with previously published studies in which stents were deployed at lower pressure, SDHP does not increase the restenosis rate in BL using mini-crush stent technique but seems to reduce the rate of stent thrombosis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216301663Coronary artery diseaseBifurcation lesion“Mini-crush” stent techniqueHigh-pressure stent deployment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antoine Gerbay
Jeremy Terreaux
Alexis Cerisier
Marco Vola
Karl Isaaz
spellingShingle Antoine Gerbay
Jeremy Terreaux
Alexis Cerisier
Marco Vola
Karl Isaaz
Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
Indian Heart Journal
Coronary artery disease
Bifurcation lesion
“Mini-crush” stent technique
High-pressure stent deployment
author_facet Antoine Gerbay
Jeremy Terreaux
Alexis Cerisier
Marco Vola
Karl Isaaz
author_sort Antoine Gerbay
title Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
title_short Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
title_full Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
title_fullStr Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: A single center experience
title_sort impact of very high pressure stent deployment on angiographic and long-term clinical outcomes in true coronary bifurcation lesions treated by the mini-crush stent technique: a single center experience
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Heart Journal
issn 0019-4832
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions (BL) using 2 stents technique is known to be associated with high rates of procedural failure especially on the side branch (SB) mainly due to stent incomplete apposition. Stent deployment at very high pressure (SDHP) may lead to better stent expansion and apposition. However, SDHP may also be at the origin of deeper wall injury resulting into major cardiac adverse events. No data are available on evaluation of SDHP in BL treated by a mini-crush stent technique. Methods: One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients underwent PCI for BL (Medina 1, 1, 1) using a mini-crush stent technique with SDHP defined as ≥20 atm. An angiographic follow-up was performed at 6 month and clinical follow-up was obtained at a median of 3 years. Results: Stent deployment mean pressures were 20 ± 1.4 atm (range 20–25) in the main vessel (MV) and 20 ± 1.5 atm (range 20–25) in SB. Simultaneous final kissing balloon was used in 92% of cases. PCI was successful in 100%. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 83% of patients. Restenosis rate was 13% (12% restenosis in the SB) with only one case (0.8%) of SB probable thrombosis. Another case of late stent thrombosis occurred at a 3 years clinical follow-up. Conclusion: Compared with previously published studies in which stents were deployed at lower pressure, SDHP does not increase the restenosis rate in BL using mini-crush stent technique but seems to reduce the rate of stent thrombosis.
topic Coronary artery disease
Bifurcation lesion
“Mini-crush” stent technique
High-pressure stent deployment
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216301663
work_keys_str_mv AT antoinegerbay impactofveryhighpressurestentdeploymentonangiographicandlongtermclinicaloutcomesintruecoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedbytheminicrushstenttechniqueasinglecenterexperience
AT jeremyterreaux impactofveryhighpressurestentdeploymentonangiographicandlongtermclinicaloutcomesintruecoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedbytheminicrushstenttechniqueasinglecenterexperience
AT alexiscerisier impactofveryhighpressurestentdeploymentonangiographicandlongtermclinicaloutcomesintruecoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedbytheminicrushstenttechniqueasinglecenterexperience
AT marcovola impactofveryhighpressurestentdeploymentonangiographicandlongtermclinicaloutcomesintruecoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedbytheminicrushstenttechniqueasinglecenterexperience
AT karlisaaz impactofveryhighpressurestentdeploymentonangiographicandlongtermclinicaloutcomesintruecoronarybifurcationlesionstreatedbytheminicrushstenttechniqueasinglecenterexperience
_version_ 1725594541497516032