Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. D...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Higher Education Press
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdf |
id |
doaj-8650499119c14826bdf2cd084385b38f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8650499119c14826bdf2cd084385b38f2020-11-24T23:17:04ZengHigher Education PressFrontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering2095-75052015-03-0121535910.15302/J-FASE-2015049Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklersXingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU01. National Engineering Research Center of Pumps and Pumping System, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2. Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaTo adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively. The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>, whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>. Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5 m·s<sup>-1</sup> greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter (arithmetic, volumetric and median) decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler.http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdfoutside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU |
spellingShingle |
Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering outside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity |
author_facet |
Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU |
author_sort |
Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU |
title |
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
title_short |
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
title_full |
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
title_sort |
comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers |
publisher |
Higher Education Press |
series |
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering |
issn |
2095-7505 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively. The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>, whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>. Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5 m·s<sup>-1</sup> greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter (arithmetic, volumetric and median) decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler. |
topic |
outside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity |
url |
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xingyezhushouqiyuanjunpingliuxingfaliu comparisonofdropletdistributionsfromfluidicandimpactsprinklers |
_version_ |
1725584879694905344 |