Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers

To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Higher Education Press 2015-03-01
Series:Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdf
id doaj-8650499119c14826bdf2cd084385b38f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8650499119c14826bdf2cd084385b38f2020-11-24T23:17:04ZengHigher Education PressFrontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering2095-75052015-03-0121535910.15302/J-FASE-2015049Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklersXingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU01. National Engineering Research Center of Pumps and Pumping System, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2. Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaTo adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively. The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>, whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>. Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5 m·s<sup>-1</sup> greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter (arithmetic, volumetric and median) decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler.http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdfoutside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU
spellingShingle Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU
Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering
outside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity
author_facet Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU
author_sort Xingye ZHU,Shouqi YUAN,Junping LIU,Xingfa LIU
title Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
title_short Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
title_full Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
title_fullStr Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
title_sort comparison of droplet distributions from fluidic and impact sprinklers
publisher Higher Education Press
series Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering
issn 2095-7505
publishDate 2015-03-01
description To adapt to the trend toward low-energy precision irrigation, the droplet distributions for two new prototype sprinklers, outside signal sprinkler (OS) and fluidic sprinkler (FS), were compared with impact sprinkler (IS). A laser precipitation monitor was used to measure the droplet distributions. Droplet size and velocity distributions were tested under four operating pressures for nozzles 1.5 m above the ground. For the operating pressures tested, the mean OS, FS and IS droplet diameters ranged from 0 to 3.4, 0 to 3.5, 0 to 4.0 mm, respectively. The mean OS and FS droplet velocities ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>, whereas IS ranged from 0 to 6.3 m·s<sup>-1</sup>. Being gas-liquid fluidic sprinklers, droplet distributions of the OS and FS were similar, although not identical. IS mostly produced a 0.5 mm larger droplet diameter and a 0.5 m·s<sup>-1</sup> greater velocity than OS and FS. A new empirical equation is proposed for determination of droplet size for OS and FS, which is sufficiently accurate and simple to use. Basic statistics for droplet size and velocity were performed on data obtained by the photographic methods. The mean droplet diameter (arithmetic, volumetric and median) decreased and the mean velocity increased in operating pressure for the three types of sprinkler.
topic outside signal sprinkler|fluidic sprinkler|impact sprinkler|sprinkler irrigation|droplet size|droplet velocity
url http://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/fileup/2095-7505/PDF/2095-7505-2015-1-53.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xingyezhushouqiyuanjunpingliuxingfaliu comparisonofdropletdistributionsfromfluidicandimpactsprinklers
_version_ 1725584879694905344