Civic Engagement Scale

This study reports on the development and validation of the Civic Engagement Scale (CES). This scale is developed to be easily administered and useful to educators who are seeking to measure the attitudes and behaviors that have been affected by a service-learning experience. This instrument was adm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy Doolittle, Anna C. Faul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-07-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013495542
id doaj-863a7c51ab9948f2ad95ee514a7679bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-863a7c51ab9948f2ad95ee514a7679bf2020-11-25T03:44:06ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402013-07-01310.1177/215824401349554210.1177_2158244013495542Civic Engagement ScaleAmy DoolittleAnna C. FaulThis study reports on the development and validation of the Civic Engagement Scale (CES). This scale is developed to be easily administered and useful to educators who are seeking to measure the attitudes and behaviors that have been affected by a service-learning experience. This instrument was administered as a validation study in a purposive sample of social work and education majors at three universities ( N = 513) with a return of 354 (69%). After the reliability and validity analysis was completed, the Attitude subscale was left with eight items and a Cronbach’s alpha level of .91. The Behavior subscale was left with six items and a Cronbach’s alpha level of .85. Principal component analysis indicated a two-dimensional scale with high loadings on both factors (mean factor loading for the attitude factor = .79, and mean factor loading for the behavior factor = .77). These results indicate that the CES is strong enough to recommend its use in educational settings. Preliminary use has demonstrated that this scale will be useful to researchers seeking to better understand the relationship of attitudes and behaviors with civic engagement in the service-learning setting. The primary limitations of this research are that the sample was limited to social work and education majors who were primarily White ( n = 312, 88.1%) and female ( n = 294, 83.1%). Therefore, further research would be needed to generalize this research to other populations.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013495542
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy Doolittle
Anna C. Faul
spellingShingle Amy Doolittle
Anna C. Faul
Civic Engagement Scale
SAGE Open
author_facet Amy Doolittle
Anna C. Faul
author_sort Amy Doolittle
title Civic Engagement Scale
title_short Civic Engagement Scale
title_full Civic Engagement Scale
title_fullStr Civic Engagement Scale
title_full_unstemmed Civic Engagement Scale
title_sort civic engagement scale
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2013-07-01
description This study reports on the development and validation of the Civic Engagement Scale (CES). This scale is developed to be easily administered and useful to educators who are seeking to measure the attitudes and behaviors that have been affected by a service-learning experience. This instrument was administered as a validation study in a purposive sample of social work and education majors at three universities ( N = 513) with a return of 354 (69%). After the reliability and validity analysis was completed, the Attitude subscale was left with eight items and a Cronbach’s alpha level of .91. The Behavior subscale was left with six items and a Cronbach’s alpha level of .85. Principal component analysis indicated a two-dimensional scale with high loadings on both factors (mean factor loading for the attitude factor = .79, and mean factor loading for the behavior factor = .77). These results indicate that the CES is strong enough to recommend its use in educational settings. Preliminary use has demonstrated that this scale will be useful to researchers seeking to better understand the relationship of attitudes and behaviors with civic engagement in the service-learning setting. The primary limitations of this research are that the sample was limited to social work and education majors who were primarily White ( n = 312, 88.1%) and female ( n = 294, 83.1%). Therefore, further research would be needed to generalize this research to other populations.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013495542
work_keys_str_mv AT amydoolittle civicengagementscale
AT annacfaul civicengagementscale
_version_ 1724516214622912512