Foucault and deaf education in Finland

The influence of Michel Foucault’s thinking in critical disability studies, and to social studies of deafness, can hardly be doubted. Foucault has offered valuable tools for the critical rethinking of deaf education and pedagogy with respect to normalization and disciplinary power, which are integra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lauri Siisiäinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oslo and Akershus University College 2016-03-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2095
id doaj-8636100ad249489b9ba6bb72a0eace74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8636100ad249489b9ba6bb72a0eace742020-11-24T20:58:11ZengOslo and Akershus University CollegeNordic Journal of Social Research1892-27832016-03-01710.7577/njsr.20951274Foucault and deaf education in FinlandLauri SiisiäinenThe influence of Michel Foucault’s thinking in critical disability studies, and to social studies of deafness, can hardly be doubted. Foucault has offered valuable tools for the critical rethinking of deaf education and pedagogy with respect to normalization and disciplinary power, which are integrally related to the historical construction of deafness as deficiency and pathology by modern, medical, and psychological knowledge. This article explores the applicability and critical potential of the Foucauldian concepts of disciplinary power, surveillance, and normalization within the specific context of the history of deaf education in Finland. The article focuses on the modernization of the education of deaf children that began during the latter half of the nineteenth century in Finland, with the influence of oralism – a pedagogical discourse and deaf-education methods of German origin. Deafness was characterized as a pathology or abnormality of the most severe kind. When taken at the general level, Foucault’s well-known concepts are easily applicable to the analysis of deaf education, also in the Finnish context. However, it is argued that things become much more complex if we first examine more closely the roles played by the eye and the ear, by optic and aural experience, in these Foucauldian notions, and if we then relate this enquiry to our analysis of oralist pedagogy and deaf education. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2095deaf educationdeafnessoralist pedagogyoralismnormalizationdisciplinary power
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauri Siisiäinen
spellingShingle Lauri Siisiäinen
Foucault and deaf education in Finland
Nordic Journal of Social Research
deaf education
deafness
oralist pedagogy
oralism
normalization
disciplinary power
author_facet Lauri Siisiäinen
author_sort Lauri Siisiäinen
title Foucault and deaf education in Finland
title_short Foucault and deaf education in Finland
title_full Foucault and deaf education in Finland
title_fullStr Foucault and deaf education in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Foucault and deaf education in Finland
title_sort foucault and deaf education in finland
publisher Oslo and Akershus University College
series Nordic Journal of Social Research
issn 1892-2783
publishDate 2016-03-01
description The influence of Michel Foucault’s thinking in critical disability studies, and to social studies of deafness, can hardly be doubted. Foucault has offered valuable tools for the critical rethinking of deaf education and pedagogy with respect to normalization and disciplinary power, which are integrally related to the historical construction of deafness as deficiency and pathology by modern, medical, and psychological knowledge. This article explores the applicability and critical potential of the Foucauldian concepts of disciplinary power, surveillance, and normalization within the specific context of the history of deaf education in Finland. The article focuses on the modernization of the education of deaf children that began during the latter half of the nineteenth century in Finland, with the influence of oralism – a pedagogical discourse and deaf-education methods of German origin. Deafness was characterized as a pathology or abnormality of the most severe kind. When taken at the general level, Foucault’s well-known concepts are easily applicable to the analysis of deaf education, also in the Finnish context. However, it is argued that things become much more complex if we first examine more closely the roles played by the eye and the ear, by optic and aural experience, in these Foucauldian notions, and if we then relate this enquiry to our analysis of oralist pedagogy and deaf education.
topic deaf education
deafness
oralist pedagogy
oralism
normalization
disciplinary power
url https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/njsr/article/view/2095
work_keys_str_mv AT laurisiisiainen foucaultanddeafeducationinfinland
_version_ 1716786287731539968