Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.

Aesthetic experiences have been distinguished from other experiences based on an aesthetic mode of processing that often entails concentrating working memory resources on the aesthetic stimulus. Since working memory is a limited-capacity system, there should be a trade-off between available resource...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosalie Weigand, Thomas Jacobsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248529
id doaj-862cb9ad7234430fa8e6a7c517ab6d0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-862cb9ad7234430fa8e6a7c517ab6d0a2021-03-25T05:31:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024852910.1371/journal.pone.0248529Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.Rosalie WeigandThomas JacobsenAesthetic experiences have been distinguished from other experiences based on an aesthetic mode of processing that often entails concentrating working memory resources on the aesthetic stimulus. Since working memory is a limited-capacity system, there should be a trade-off between available resources and the aesthetic experience. To test whether the intensity of the aesthetic experience is reduced if working memory resources are otherwise occupied, we employed an experience sampling method. One hundred and fifteen undergraduate students (45% female; Mage = 23.50 years, SD = 2.72 years) participated in a 2-week experience sampling study and furnished a total of 15,047 reports of their aesthetic experiences. As measures of current working memory resources, participants answered questions regarding their current working memory load and whether they were engaged in a second task. In addition, they reported whether they had had an aesthetic experience and how much they had savored the aesthetic experience. Multilevel modeling was used for data analysis. A higher working memory load was associated with fewer aesthetic experiences and reduced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. Second tasks, however, that were perceived as demanding and requiring a lot of concentration enhanced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. In sum, other goal-oriented behavior that requires working memory resources appears to conflict with aesthetic experiences in everyday life.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248529
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosalie Weigand
Thomas Jacobsen
spellingShingle Rosalie Weigand
Thomas Jacobsen
Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rosalie Weigand
Thomas Jacobsen
author_sort Rosalie Weigand
title Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
title_short Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
title_full Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
title_fullStr Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
title_full_unstemmed Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
title_sort beauty and the busy mind: occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aesthetic experiences have been distinguished from other experiences based on an aesthetic mode of processing that often entails concentrating working memory resources on the aesthetic stimulus. Since working memory is a limited-capacity system, there should be a trade-off between available resources and the aesthetic experience. To test whether the intensity of the aesthetic experience is reduced if working memory resources are otherwise occupied, we employed an experience sampling method. One hundred and fifteen undergraduate students (45% female; Mage = 23.50 years, SD = 2.72 years) participated in a 2-week experience sampling study and furnished a total of 15,047 reports of their aesthetic experiences. As measures of current working memory resources, participants answered questions regarding their current working memory load and whether they were engaged in a second task. In addition, they reported whether they had had an aesthetic experience and how much they had savored the aesthetic experience. Multilevel modeling was used for data analysis. A higher working memory load was associated with fewer aesthetic experiences and reduced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. Second tasks, however, that were perceived as demanding and requiring a lot of concentration enhanced the savoring of aesthetic experiences. In sum, other goal-oriented behavior that requires working memory resources appears to conflict with aesthetic experiences in everyday life.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248529
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalieweigand beautyandthebusymindoccupiedworkingmemoryresourcesimpairaestheticexperiencesineverydaylife
AT thomasjacobsen beautyandthebusymindoccupiedworkingmemoryresourcesimpairaestheticexperiencesineverydaylife
_version_ 1714766467442933760