The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation.
The TGF-β/Smad signaling system decreases its activity through strong negative regulation. Several molecular mechanisms of negative regulation have been published, but the relative impact of each mechanism on the overall system is unknown. In this work, we used computational and experimental methods...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-06-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4105941?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-8614980317a34d449f8021a920999167 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8614980317a34d449f8021a9209991672020-11-25T01:42:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582014-06-01106e100357310.1371/journal.pcbi.1003573The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation.Junjie WangLisa Tucker-KelloggInn Chuan NgRuirui JiaP S ThiagarajanJacob K WhiteHanry YuThe TGF-β/Smad signaling system decreases its activity through strong negative regulation. Several molecular mechanisms of negative regulation have been published, but the relative impact of each mechanism on the overall system is unknown. In this work, we used computational and experimental methods to assess multiple negative regulatory effects on Smad signaling in HaCaT cells. Previously reported negative regulatory effects were classified by time-scale: degradation of phosphorylated R-Smad and I-Smad-induced receptor degradation were slow-mode effects, and dephosphorylation of R-Smad was a fast-mode effect. We modeled combinations of these effects, but found no combination capable of explaining the observed dynamics of TGF-β/Smad signaling. We then proposed a negative feedback loop with upregulation of the phosphatase PPM1A. The resulting model was able to explain the dynamics of Smad signaling, under both short and long exposures to TGF-β. Consistent with this model, immuno-blots showed PPM1A levels to be significantly increased within 30 min after TGF-β stimulation. Lastly, our model was able to resolve an apparent contradiction in the published literature, concerning the dynamics of phosphorylated R-Smad degradation. We conclude that the dynamics of Smad negative regulation cannot be explained by the negative regulatory effects that had previously been modeled, and we provide evidence for a new negative feedback loop through PPM1A upregulation. This work shows that tight coupling of computational and experiments approaches can yield improved understanding of complex pathways.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4105941?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Junjie Wang Lisa Tucker-Kellogg Inn Chuan Ng Ruirui Jia P S Thiagarajan Jacob K White Hanry Yu |
spellingShingle |
Junjie Wang Lisa Tucker-Kellogg Inn Chuan Ng Ruirui Jia P S Thiagarajan Jacob K White Hanry Yu The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. PLoS Computational Biology |
author_facet |
Junjie Wang Lisa Tucker-Kellogg Inn Chuan Ng Ruirui Jia P S Thiagarajan Jacob K White Hanry Yu |
author_sort |
Junjie Wang |
title |
The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. |
title_short |
The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. |
title_full |
The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. |
title_fullStr |
The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The self-limiting dynamics of TGF-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through PPM1A upregulation. |
title_sort |
self-limiting dynamics of tgf-β signaling in silico and in vitro, with negative feedback through ppm1a upregulation. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS Computational Biology |
issn |
1553-734X 1553-7358 |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
The TGF-β/Smad signaling system decreases its activity through strong negative regulation. Several molecular mechanisms of negative regulation have been published, but the relative impact of each mechanism on the overall system is unknown. In this work, we used computational and experimental methods to assess multiple negative regulatory effects on Smad signaling in HaCaT cells. Previously reported negative regulatory effects were classified by time-scale: degradation of phosphorylated R-Smad and I-Smad-induced receptor degradation were slow-mode effects, and dephosphorylation of R-Smad was a fast-mode effect. We modeled combinations of these effects, but found no combination capable of explaining the observed dynamics of TGF-β/Smad signaling. We then proposed a negative feedback loop with upregulation of the phosphatase PPM1A. The resulting model was able to explain the dynamics of Smad signaling, under both short and long exposures to TGF-β. Consistent with this model, immuno-blots showed PPM1A levels to be significantly increased within 30 min after TGF-β stimulation. Lastly, our model was able to resolve an apparent contradiction in the published literature, concerning the dynamics of phosphorylated R-Smad degradation. We conclude that the dynamics of Smad negative regulation cannot be explained by the negative regulatory effects that had previously been modeled, and we provide evidence for a new negative feedback loop through PPM1A upregulation. This work shows that tight coupling of computational and experiments approaches can yield improved understanding of complex pathways. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4105941?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT junjiewang theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT lisatuckerkellogg theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT innchuanng theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT ruiruijia theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT psthiagarajan theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT jacobkwhite theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT hanryyu theselflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT junjiewang selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT lisatuckerkellogg selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT innchuanng selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT ruiruijia selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT psthiagarajan selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT jacobkwhite selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation AT hanryyu selflimitingdynamicsoftgfbsignalinginsilicoandinvitrowithnegativefeedbackthroughppm1aupregulation |
_version_ |
1725035412855980032 |