Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
Cycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Mathematical and Computational Applications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48 |
id |
doaj-861023f1340b429b82538a3faacb4ed3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-861023f1340b429b82538a3faacb4ed32020-11-25T01:33:14ZengMDPI AGMathematical and Computational Applications2297-87472019-04-012424810.3390/mca24020048mca24020048Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction EstimationBrenno Cabella0Fernando Meloni1Alexandre S. Martinez2Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 271, 01140-070 São Paulo, BrazilFaculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, BrazilFaculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, BrazilCycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly addressed in coupled population dynamics. To illustrate the aliasing effect, the Lotka−Volterra model oscillatory regime is numerically sampled, creating prey−predator cycles. We show that inadequate sampling rates may produce inversions in the cause-effect relationship among other artifacts. More generally, slow acquisition rates may distort data interpretation and produce deceptive patterns and eventually leading to misinterpretations, as predators becoming preys. Experiments in coupled population dynamics should be designed that address the eventual aliasing effect.https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48temporal aliasing effectecological methodssampling ratescyclic dynamicspredator–prey systempopulation biology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brenno Cabella Fernando Meloni Alexandre S. Martinez |
spellingShingle |
Brenno Cabella Fernando Meloni Alexandre S. Martinez Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation Mathematical and Computational Applications temporal aliasing effect ecological methods sampling rates cyclic dynamics predator–prey system population biology |
author_facet |
Brenno Cabella Fernando Meloni Alexandre S. Martinez |
author_sort |
Brenno Cabella |
title |
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation |
title_short |
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation |
title_full |
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation |
title_fullStr |
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation |
title_sort |
inadequate sampling rates can undermine the reliability of ecological interaction estimation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Mathematical and Computational Applications |
issn |
2297-8747 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Cycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly addressed in coupled population dynamics. To illustrate the aliasing effect, the Lotka−Volterra model oscillatory regime is numerically sampled, creating prey−predator cycles. We show that inadequate sampling rates may produce inversions in the cause-effect relationship among other artifacts. More generally, slow acquisition rates may distort data interpretation and produce deceptive patterns and eventually leading to misinterpretations, as predators becoming preys. Experiments in coupled population dynamics should be designed that address the eventual aliasing effect. |
topic |
temporal aliasing effect ecological methods sampling rates cyclic dynamics predator–prey system population biology |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brennocabella inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation AT fernandomeloni inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation AT alexandresmartinez inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation |
_version_ |
1725078735964602368 |