Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation

Cycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brenno Cabella, Fernando Meloni, Alexandre S. Martinez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Mathematical and Computational Applications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48
id doaj-861023f1340b429b82538a3faacb4ed3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-861023f1340b429b82538a3faacb4ed32020-11-25T01:33:14ZengMDPI AGMathematical and Computational Applications2297-87472019-04-012424810.3390/mca24020048mca24020048Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction EstimationBrenno Cabella0Fernando Meloni1Alexandre S. Martinez2Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rua Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 271, 01140-070 São Paulo, BrazilFaculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, BrazilFaculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, BrazilCycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly addressed in coupled population dynamics. To illustrate the aliasing effect, the Lotka−Volterra model oscillatory regime is numerically sampled, creating prey−predator cycles. We show that inadequate sampling rates may produce inversions in the cause-effect relationship among other artifacts. More generally, slow acquisition rates may distort data interpretation and produce deceptive patterns and eventually leading to misinterpretations, as predators becoming preys. Experiments in coupled population dynamics should be designed that address the eventual aliasing effect.https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48temporal aliasing effectecological methodssampling ratescyclic dynamicspredator–prey systempopulation biology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brenno Cabella
Fernando Meloni
Alexandre S. Martinez
spellingShingle Brenno Cabella
Fernando Meloni
Alexandre S. Martinez
Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
Mathematical and Computational Applications
temporal aliasing effect
ecological methods
sampling rates
cyclic dynamics
predator–prey system
population biology
author_facet Brenno Cabella
Fernando Meloni
Alexandre S. Martinez
author_sort Brenno Cabella
title Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
title_short Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
title_full Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
title_fullStr Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Inadequate Sampling Rates Can Undermine the Reliability of Ecological Interaction Estimation
title_sort inadequate sampling rates can undermine the reliability of ecological interaction estimation
publisher MDPI AG
series Mathematical and Computational Applications
issn 2297-8747
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Cycles in population dynamics are abundant in nature and are understood as emerging from the interaction among coupled species. When sampling is conducted at a slow rate compared to the population cycle period (aliasing effect), one is prone to misinterpretations. However, aliasing has been poorly addressed in coupled population dynamics. To illustrate the aliasing effect, the Lotka−Volterra model oscillatory regime is numerically sampled, creating prey−predator cycles. We show that inadequate sampling rates may produce inversions in the cause-effect relationship among other artifacts. More generally, slow acquisition rates may distort data interpretation and produce deceptive patterns and eventually leading to misinterpretations, as predators becoming preys. Experiments in coupled population dynamics should be designed that address the eventual aliasing effect.
topic temporal aliasing effect
ecological methods
sampling rates
cyclic dynamics
predator–prey system
population biology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8747/24/2/48
work_keys_str_mv AT brennocabella inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation
AT fernandomeloni inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation
AT alexandresmartinez inadequatesamplingratescanunderminethereliabilityofecologicalinteractionestimation
_version_ 1725078735964602368