Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures

A regional control constrained spray deposition model was established to study the flow fields and deposition of atomized droplets in a semienclosed space. The FLUENT software was used to simulate the changing rules of the pressure field, velocity field, and temperature field under different atomiza...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yegao Chen, Jiancheng Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIP Publishing LLC 2019-11-01
Series:AIP Advances
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5124407
id doaj-85f941e37ccf43d9b690a751c794bae8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85f941e37ccf43d9b690a751c794bae82020-11-25T01:21:17ZengAIP Publishing LLCAIP Advances2158-32262019-11-01911115310115310-1110.1063/1.5124407Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressuresYegao Chen0Jiancheng Yin1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Suqian College, Suqian 223800, ChinaFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, ChinaA regional control constrained spray deposition model was established to study the flow fields and deposition of atomized droplets in a semienclosed space. The FLUENT software was used to simulate the changing rules of the pressure field, velocity field, and temperature field under different atomization gas pressures (AGPs), aiming to optimize the equipment and parameters of spray Conform. The results show that the flow fields are prone to be disturbed by the controller of the two rotating disks when the AGP is low, which makes it difficult to control the droplet deposition. Besides, excessive AGP will bring a robust reverse airflow, which is not conducive to control droplet deposition either. However, the outlet pressure of the diversion tube is about 2.5 × 104 Pa when the AGP is between 2.5 and 3.0 × 105 Pa. In this condition, the melt will exit the nozzle without blockage. Moreover, the pressure near the basement is about 5 × 104 Pa at this point, making the droplet deposition controllable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5124407
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yegao Chen
Jiancheng Yin
spellingShingle Yegao Chen
Jiancheng Yin
Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
AIP Advances
author_facet Yegao Chen
Jiancheng Yin
author_sort Yegao Chen
title Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
title_short Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
title_full Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
title_fullStr Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
title_full_unstemmed Study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
title_sort study on flow fields of regional control constrained spray deposition under different atomization gas pressures
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
series AIP Advances
issn 2158-3226
publishDate 2019-11-01
description A regional control constrained spray deposition model was established to study the flow fields and deposition of atomized droplets in a semienclosed space. The FLUENT software was used to simulate the changing rules of the pressure field, velocity field, and temperature field under different atomization gas pressures (AGPs), aiming to optimize the equipment and parameters of spray Conform. The results show that the flow fields are prone to be disturbed by the controller of the two rotating disks when the AGP is low, which makes it difficult to control the droplet deposition. Besides, excessive AGP will bring a robust reverse airflow, which is not conducive to control droplet deposition either. However, the outlet pressure of the diversion tube is about 2.5 × 104 Pa when the AGP is between 2.5 and 3.0 × 105 Pa. In this condition, the melt will exit the nozzle without blockage. Moreover, the pressure near the basement is about 5 × 104 Pa at this point, making the droplet deposition controllable.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5124407
work_keys_str_mv AT yegaochen studyonflowfieldsofregionalcontrolconstrainedspraydepositionunderdifferentatomizationgaspressures
AT jianchengyin studyonflowfieldsofregionalcontrolconstrainedspraydepositionunderdifferentatomizationgaspressures
_version_ 1725131174149357568