Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation

Current treatment approaches for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) have a ceiling of success of around 50%. This is despite 15 years of developing adjunctive ablation strategies in addition to pulmonary vein isolation to target the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate in AF. A major shortcoming of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fu Siong Ng, Balvinder S. Handa, Xinyang Li, Nicholas S. Peters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2020.00987/full
id doaj-85e73c0d0214488cb25ba3cff58c969b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85e73c0d0214488cb25ba3cff58c969b2020-11-25T03:50:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2020-08-011110.3389/fphys.2020.00987569870Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial FibrillationFu Siong NgBalvinder S. HandaXinyang LiNicholas S. PetersCurrent treatment approaches for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) have a ceiling of success of around 50%. This is despite 15 years of developing adjunctive ablation strategies in addition to pulmonary vein isolation to target the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate in AF. A major shortcoming of our current approach to AF treatment is its predominantly empirical nature. This has in part been due to a lack of consensus on the mechanisms that sustain human AF. In this article, we review evidence suggesting that the previous debates on AF being either an organized arrhythmia with a focal driver or a disorganized rhythm sustained by multiple wavelets, may prove to be a false dichotomy. Instead, a range of fibrillation electrophenotypes exists along a continuous spectrum, and the predominant mechanism in an individual case is determined by the nature and extent of remodeling of the underlying substrate. We propose moving beyond the current empirical approach to AF treatment, highlight the need to prescribe AF treatments based on the underlying AF electrophenotype, and review several possible novel mapping algorithms that may be useful in discerning the AF electrophenotype to guide tailored treatments, including Granger Causality mapping.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2020.00987/fullatrial fibrilation (AF)fibrillationablationmappingGranger analyses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fu Siong Ng
Balvinder S. Handa
Xinyang Li
Nicholas S. Peters
spellingShingle Fu Siong Ng
Balvinder S. Handa
Xinyang Li
Nicholas S. Peters
Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
Frontiers in Physiology
atrial fibrilation (AF)
fibrillation
ablation
mapping
Granger analyses
author_facet Fu Siong Ng
Balvinder S. Handa
Xinyang Li
Nicholas S. Peters
author_sort Fu Siong Ng
title Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Toward Mechanism-Directed Electrophenotype-Based Treatments for Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort toward mechanism-directed electrophenotype-based treatments for atrial fibrillation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Current treatment approaches for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) have a ceiling of success of around 50%. This is despite 15 years of developing adjunctive ablation strategies in addition to pulmonary vein isolation to target the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate in AF. A major shortcoming of our current approach to AF treatment is its predominantly empirical nature. This has in part been due to a lack of consensus on the mechanisms that sustain human AF. In this article, we review evidence suggesting that the previous debates on AF being either an organized arrhythmia with a focal driver or a disorganized rhythm sustained by multiple wavelets, may prove to be a false dichotomy. Instead, a range of fibrillation electrophenotypes exists along a continuous spectrum, and the predominant mechanism in an individual case is determined by the nature and extent of remodeling of the underlying substrate. We propose moving beyond the current empirical approach to AF treatment, highlight the need to prescribe AF treatments based on the underlying AF electrophenotype, and review several possible novel mapping algorithms that may be useful in discerning the AF electrophenotype to guide tailored treatments, including Granger Causality mapping.
topic atrial fibrilation (AF)
fibrillation
ablation
mapping
Granger analyses
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2020.00987/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fusiongng towardmechanismdirectedelectrophenotypebasedtreatmentsforatrialfibrillation
AT balvindershanda towardmechanismdirectedelectrophenotypebasedtreatmentsforatrialfibrillation
AT xinyangli towardmechanismdirectedelectrophenotypebasedtreatmentsforatrialfibrillation
AT nicholasspeters towardmechanismdirectedelectrophenotypebasedtreatmentsforatrialfibrillation
_version_ 1724492096567508992