The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol

Abstract Background A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and saf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. F. W. Rikken, C. R. Kowalik, M. H. Emanuel, M. Y. Bongers, T. Spinder, J. H. de Kruif, K. W. M. Bloemenkamp, F. W. Jansen, S. Veersema, A. G. M. G. J. Mulders, A. L. Thurkow, K. Hald, A. Mohazzab, Y. Khalaf, T. J. Clark, M. Farrugia, H. A. van Vliet, M. S. Stephenson, F. van der Veen, M. van Wely, B. W. J. Mol, M. Goddijn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0637-6
id doaj-85dbd38a5cb14854a64c41441fa45565
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85dbd38a5cb14854a64c41441fa455652020-11-24T21:19:24ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742018-10-011811510.1186/s12905-018-0637-6The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocolJ. F. W. Rikken0C. R. Kowalik1M. H. Emanuel2M. Y. Bongers3T. Spinder4J. H. de Kruif5K. W. M. Bloemenkamp6F. W. Jansen7S. Veersema8A. G. M. G. J. Mulders9A. L. Thurkow10K. Hald11A. Mohazzab12Y. Khalaf13T. J. Clark14M. Farrugia15H. A. van Vliet16M. S. Stephenson17F. van der Veen18M. van Wely19B. W. J. Mol20M. Goddijn21Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamUniversity Medical Center UtrechtMaxima Medical CentreLeeuwarden Medical CentreCanisius Wilhelmina HospitalUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUniversity Medical Centre LeidenUniversity Medical Center UtrechtErasmus Medical CentreCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamOslo University HospitalAvicenna research institute TeheranGuy’s hospital, Great maze pondBirmingham women’s hospitalEast Kent Hospitals UniversityCatharina hospitalUniversity of Illinois HospitalCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamThe Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of AdelaideCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of AmsterdamAbstract Background A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to assess whether hysteroscopic septum resection improves reproductive outcome in women with a septate uterus. Methods/design A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing hysteroscopic septum resection and expectant management in women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and diagnosed with a septate uterus. The primary outcome is live birth, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. Secondary outcomes are ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and complications following hysteroscopic septum resection. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed, estimating the cumulative probability of conception leading to live birth rate over time. Based on retrospective studies, we anticipate an improvement of the live birth rate from 35% without surgery to 70% with surgery. To demonstrate this difference, 68 women need to be randomised. Discussion Hysteroscopic septum resection is worldwide considered as a standard procedure in women with a septate uterus. Solid evidence for this recommendation is lacking and data from randomised trials is urgently needed. Trial registration Dutch trial registry (NTR1676, 18th of February 2009).http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0637-6Septate uterusRecurrent miscarriageSubfertilityHysteroscopic septum resectionRandomised controlled trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. F. W. Rikken
C. R. Kowalik
M. H. Emanuel
M. Y. Bongers
T. Spinder
J. H. de Kruif
K. W. M. Bloemenkamp
F. W. Jansen
S. Veersema
A. G. M. G. J. Mulders
A. L. Thurkow
K. Hald
A. Mohazzab
Y. Khalaf
T. J. Clark
M. Farrugia
H. A. van Vliet
M. S. Stephenson
F. van der Veen
M. van Wely
B. W. J. Mol
M. Goddijn
spellingShingle J. F. W. Rikken
C. R. Kowalik
M. H. Emanuel
M. Y. Bongers
T. Spinder
J. H. de Kruif
K. W. M. Bloemenkamp
F. W. Jansen
S. Veersema
A. G. M. G. J. Mulders
A. L. Thurkow
K. Hald
A. Mohazzab
Y. Khalaf
T. J. Clark
M. Farrugia
H. A. van Vliet
M. S. Stephenson
F. van der Veen
M. van Wely
B. W. J. Mol
M. Goddijn
The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
BMC Women's Health
Septate uterus
Recurrent miscarriage
Subfertility
Hysteroscopic septum resection
Randomised controlled trial
author_facet J. F. W. Rikken
C. R. Kowalik
M. H. Emanuel
M. Y. Bongers
T. Spinder
J. H. de Kruif
K. W. M. Bloemenkamp
F. W. Jansen
S. Veersema
A. G. M. G. J. Mulders
A. L. Thurkow
K. Hald
A. Mohazzab
Y. Khalaf
T. J. Clark
M. Farrugia
H. A. van Vliet
M. S. Stephenson
F. van der Veen
M. van Wely
B. W. J. Mol
M. Goddijn
author_sort J. F. W. Rikken
title The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
title_short The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
title_full The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
title_fullStr The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
title_full_unstemmed The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol
title_sort randomised uterine septum transsection trial (trust): design and protocol
publisher BMC
series BMC Women's Health
issn 1472-6874
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract Background A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to assess whether hysteroscopic septum resection improves reproductive outcome in women with a septate uterus. Methods/design A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing hysteroscopic septum resection and expectant management in women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and diagnosed with a septate uterus. The primary outcome is live birth, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. Secondary outcomes are ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and complications following hysteroscopic septum resection. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed, estimating the cumulative probability of conception leading to live birth rate over time. Based on retrospective studies, we anticipate an improvement of the live birth rate from 35% without surgery to 70% with surgery. To demonstrate this difference, 68 women need to be randomised. Discussion Hysteroscopic septum resection is worldwide considered as a standard procedure in women with a septate uterus. Solid evidence for this recommendation is lacking and data from randomised trials is urgently needed. Trial registration Dutch trial registry (NTR1676, 18th of February 2009).
topic Septate uterus
Recurrent miscarriage
Subfertility
Hysteroscopic septum resection
Randomised controlled trial
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0637-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jfwrikken therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT crkowalik therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mhemanuel therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mybongers therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT tspinder therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT jhdekruif therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT kwmbloemenkamp therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT fwjansen therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT sveersema therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT agmgjmulders therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT althurkow therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT khald therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT amohazzab therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT ykhalaf therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT tjclark therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mfarrugia therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT havanvliet therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT msstephenson therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT fvanderveen therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mvanwely therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT bwjmol therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mgoddijn therandomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT jfwrikken randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT crkowalik randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mhemanuel randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mybongers randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT tspinder randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT jhdekruif randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT kwmbloemenkamp randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT fwjansen randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT sveersema randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT agmgjmulders randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT althurkow randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT khald randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT amohazzab randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT ykhalaf randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT tjclark randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mfarrugia randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT havanvliet randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT msstephenson randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT fvanderveen randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mvanwely randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT bwjmol randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
AT mgoddijn randomiseduterineseptumtranssectiontrialtrustdesignandprotocol
_version_ 1726005602430222336