Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast-conserving treatment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component (EIC) is associated with DCIS-involved surgical margins and therefore it has an increased recurrence rate. EIC is a non-palpable lesion...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Imaging |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/9/5 |
id |
doaj-85c03ee298b549c3b0e7eeaee3f50f1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-85c03ee298b549c3b0e7eeaee3f50f1d2020-11-24T21:11:25ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422009-04-0191510.1186/1471-2342-9-5Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal componentBult PeterBoetes CarlaSchouten van der Velden Arjan PWobbes Theo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast-conserving treatment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component (EIC) is associated with DCIS-involved surgical margins and therefore it has an increased recurrence rate. EIC is a non-palpable lesion of which the size is frequently underestimated on mammography. This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in size assessment of breast cancer with EIC.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>23 patients were identified and the mammographic (n = 21) and MR (n = 23) images were re-reviewed by a senior radiologist. Size on MR images was compared with histopathological tumour extent.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The correlation of radiological size with histopathological size was r = 0.20 in mammography (p = 0.39) compared to r = 0.65 in MRI (p < 0.01). Mammography underestimated histopathological tumour size in 62%. MR images over- or underestimated tumour size in 22% and 30% of the cases, respectively. In poorly differentiated EIC, MRI adequately estimated the extent more often compared to moderately differentiated EIC (60% versus 25%, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Size assessment of MRI imaging was more accurate compared to mammography. This was predominantly true for poorly differentiated EIC.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/9/5 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bult Peter Boetes Carla Schouten van der Velden Arjan P Wobbes Theo |
spellingShingle |
Bult Peter Boetes Carla Schouten van der Velden Arjan P Wobbes Theo Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component BMC Medical Imaging |
author_facet |
Bult Peter Boetes Carla Schouten van der Velden Arjan P Wobbes Theo |
author_sort |
Bult Peter |
title |
Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
title_short |
Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
title_full |
Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
title_fullStr |
Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
title_full_unstemmed |
Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
title_sort |
magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Imaging |
issn |
1471-2342 |
publishDate |
2009-04-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast-conserving treatment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component (EIC) is associated with DCIS-involved surgical margins and therefore it has an increased recurrence rate. EIC is a non-palpable lesion of which the size is frequently underestimated on mammography. This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in size assessment of breast cancer with EIC.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>23 patients were identified and the mammographic (n = 21) and MR (n = 23) images were re-reviewed by a senior radiologist. Size on MR images was compared with histopathological tumour extent.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The correlation of radiological size with histopathological size was r = 0.20 in mammography (p = 0.39) compared to r = 0.65 in MRI (p < 0.01). Mammography underestimated histopathological tumour size in 62%. MR images over- or underestimated tumour size in 22% and 30% of the cases, respectively. In poorly differentiated EIC, MRI adequately estimated the extent more often compared to moderately differentiated EIC (60% versus 25%, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Size assessment of MRI imaging was more accurate compared to mammography. This was predominantly true for poorly differentiated EIC.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/9/5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bultpeter magneticresonanceimaginginsizeassessmentofinvasivebreastcarcinomawithanextensiveintraductalcomponent AT boetescarla magneticresonanceimaginginsizeassessmentofinvasivebreastcarcinomawithanextensiveintraductalcomponent AT schoutenvanderveldenarjanp magneticresonanceimaginginsizeassessmentofinvasivebreastcarcinomawithanextensiveintraductalcomponent AT wobbestheo magneticresonanceimaginginsizeassessmentofinvasivebreastcarcinomawithanextensiveintraductalcomponent |
_version_ |
1716753448881356800 |