"The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa

Both fortress and community-based approaches to conservation have shown poor (sometimes negative) results in terms of environmental protection and poverty reduction. Either approach can also trigger grassroots resistance. This article is centered on an allegedly ′community-based′ conservation and de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marina Padrão Temudo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Conservation & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2012;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=366;aulast=Temudo
id doaj-85ba77aaebec47a0a3a037bf4aca5e67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85ba77aaebec47a0a3a037bf4aca5e672020-11-25T00:04:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49232012-01-0110435436610.4103/0972-4923.105563"The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western AfricaMarina Padrão TemudoBoth fortress and community-based approaches to conservation have shown poor (sometimes negative) results in terms of environmental protection and poverty reduction. Either approach can also trigger grassroots resistance. This article is centered on an allegedly ′community-based′ conservation and development project (and its successive follow-ups) intended to create a national park in Guinea-Bissau. It discusses how external agents have constructed the need for intervention, and explores the negative consequences of the practical solutions adopted for a non-existing problem, as well as the on-going shifting and multiple responses of local people. The article aims to demonstrate that supposedly community-based approaches can be as authoritarian and ineffective as fortress conservation, and that resistance generated by them can be fruitless in terms of collective empowerment and welfare, while also being harmful for the environment. The only genuine winner is the aid industry.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2012;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=366;aulast=TemudoConservation approachesparkspower relationsresistance and complianceGuinea-Bissauwestern Africa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marina Padrão Temudo
spellingShingle Marina Padrão Temudo
"The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
Conservation & Society
Conservation approaches
parks
power relations
resistance and compliance
Guinea-Bissau
western Africa
author_facet Marina Padrão Temudo
author_sort Marina Padrão Temudo
title "The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
title_short "The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
title_full "The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
title_fullStr "The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
title_full_unstemmed "The White Men Bought the Forests": Conservation and Contestation in Guinea-Bissau, Western Africa
title_sort "the white men bought the forests": conservation and contestation in guinea-bissau, western africa
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Conservation & Society
issn 0972-4923
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Both fortress and community-based approaches to conservation have shown poor (sometimes negative) results in terms of environmental protection and poverty reduction. Either approach can also trigger grassroots resistance. This article is centered on an allegedly ′community-based′ conservation and development project (and its successive follow-ups) intended to create a national park in Guinea-Bissau. It discusses how external agents have constructed the need for intervention, and explores the negative consequences of the practical solutions adopted for a non-existing problem, as well as the on-going shifting and multiple responses of local people. The article aims to demonstrate that supposedly community-based approaches can be as authoritarian and ineffective as fortress conservation, and that resistance generated by them can be fruitless in terms of collective empowerment and welfare, while also being harmful for the environment. The only genuine winner is the aid industry.
topic Conservation approaches
parks
power relations
resistance and compliance
Guinea-Bissau
western Africa
url http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2012;volume=10;issue=4;spage=354;epage=366;aulast=Temudo
work_keys_str_mv AT marinapadraotemudo thewhitemenboughttheforestsconservationandcontestationinguineabissauwesternafrica
_version_ 1725430946082062336