A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induct...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=Bhakta |
id |
doaj-85b8dfd594124759a0ca4813847dcbd6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-85b8dfd594124759a0ca4813847dcbd62020-11-24T22:23:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662010-01-013181010.4103/0974-1208.63114A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancyRajesh BhaktaPratap KumarSatish Kumar AdigaGurprasad KalthurObjectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO 2 incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. Results: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO 2 system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CO 2 -free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=BhaktaCO 2 incubatorintrauterine inseminationpregnancy ratesperm preparationwater bath |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rajesh Bhakta Pratap Kumar Satish Kumar Adiga Gurprasad Kalthur |
spellingShingle |
Rajesh Bhakta Pratap Kumar Satish Kumar Adiga Gurprasad Kalthur A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences CO 2 incubator intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate sperm preparation water bath |
author_facet |
Rajesh Bhakta Pratap Kumar Satish Kumar Adiga Gurprasad Kalthur |
author_sort |
Rajesh Bhakta |
title |
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_short |
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_full |
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_fullStr |
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_full_unstemmed |
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
title_sort |
randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences |
issn |
0974-1208 1998-4766 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO 2 incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. Results: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO 2 system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CO 2 -free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate. |
topic |
CO 2 incubator intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate sperm preparation water bath |
url |
http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=Bhakta |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rajeshbhakta arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT pratapkumar arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT satishkumaradiga arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT gurprasadkalthur arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT rajeshbhakta randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT pratapkumar randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT satishkumaradiga randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy AT gurprasadkalthur randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy |
_version_ |
1725766108650143744 |