A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajesh Bhakta, Pratap Kumar, Satish Kumar Adiga, Gurprasad Kalthur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=Bhakta
id doaj-85b8dfd594124759a0ca4813847dcbd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85b8dfd594124759a0ca4813847dcbd62020-11-24T22:23:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662010-01-013181010.4103/0974-1208.63114A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancyRajesh BhaktaPratap KumarSatish Kumar AdigaGurprasad KalthurObjectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO 2 incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. Results: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO 2 system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CO 2 -free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=BhaktaCO 2 incubatorintrauterine inseminationpregnancy ratesperm preparationwater bath
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajesh Bhakta
Pratap Kumar
Satish Kumar Adiga
Gurprasad Kalthur
spellingShingle Rajesh Bhakta
Pratap Kumar
Satish Kumar Adiga
Gurprasad Kalthur
A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
CO 2 incubator
intrauterine insemination
pregnancy rate
sperm preparation
water bath
author_facet Rajesh Bhakta
Pratap Kumar
Satish Kumar Adiga
Gurprasad Kalthur
author_sort Rajesh Bhakta
title A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_short A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_full A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_fullStr A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
title_sort randomized controlled study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in sperm extraction using carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide free system in relation to intrauterine insemination pregnancy
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of two different systems i.e. circulating water bath and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) incubator in extracting motile sperm for IUI programme and their effect on pregnancy outcome.Methods: The study was performed on sixty-two patients recruited for ovulation induction followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI) in University fertility clinic. The patients were randomly divided into two groups and sperm preparation was performed with either water bath or CO 2 incubator system. The efficiency of the two systems was analyzed in relation to pregnancy outcome. Results: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of water bath and CO 2 system with respect to the quality of sperm extracted and pregnancy outcome. Although pregnancy rate was marginally higher in water bath group, it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: CO 2 -free system can be a cost-effective approach in IUI programme which does not compromise with pregnancy rate.
topic CO 2 incubator
intrauterine insemination
pregnancy rate
sperm preparation
water bath
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2010;volume=3;issue=1;spage=8;epage=10;aulast=Bhakta
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshbhakta arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT pratapkumar arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT satishkumaradiga arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT gurprasadkalthur arandomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT rajeshbhakta randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT pratapkumar randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT satishkumaradiga randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
AT gurprasadkalthur randomizedcontrolledstudytoevaluatethecosteffectivenessinspermextractionusingcarbondioxideandcarbondioxidefreesysteminrelationtointrauterineinseminationpregnancy
_version_ 1725766108650143744