Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social

This text draws from the observation of social workers’ practices, of what they say about them and of their relationship to forms of knowledge drawn from school and their field practice. Two groups among others are examined: clinical and militant social workers. The first group, almost exclusively m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-François Gaspar
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Les éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’Homme 2007-10-01
Series:Cahiers de la Recherche sur l'Education et les Savoirs
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cres/956
id doaj-85b32d1fb7ff44669bc886cd9a4eb03f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85b32d1fb7ff44669bc886cd9a4eb03f2020-11-24T22:08:43ZfraLes éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’HommeCahiers de la Recherche sur l'Education et les Savoirs1635-35442265-77622007-10-016153169Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail socialJean-François GasparThis text draws from the observation of social workers’ practices, of what they say about them and of their relationship to forms of knowledge drawn from school and their field practice. Two groups among others are examined: clinical and militant social workers. The first group, almost exclusively made up of women, has had a short brush with university studies. These workers negate the technical knowledge conveyed by the social work schools, value reflection, and more still introspection, beyond what is asked for by users and psychology. They refer to the psychologists with whom they work and give primacy to supervision and short training sessions. The second group comes from the militant world (parties, unions, associations), and have often been through shorter and more chaotic schooling. They distrust schools and established knowledge, but value self-learning, which is a characteristic of the universe of militancy.http://journals.openedition.org/cres/956Clinical social workersField knowledgeMilitant social workersSchool knowledgeSocial workTheory/practice
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean-François Gaspar
spellingShingle Jean-François Gaspar
Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
Cahiers de la Recherche sur l'Education et les Savoirs
Clinical social workers
Field knowledge
Militant social workers
School knowledge
Social work
Theory/practice
author_facet Jean-François Gaspar
author_sort Jean-François Gaspar
title Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
title_short Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
title_full Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
title_fullStr Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
title_full_unstemmed Entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
title_sort entreprise de légitimation et de délégitimation des savoirs scolaires et « de terrain » dans l’univers du travail social
publisher Les éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’Homme
series Cahiers de la Recherche sur l'Education et les Savoirs
issn 1635-3544
2265-7762
publishDate 2007-10-01
description This text draws from the observation of social workers’ practices, of what they say about them and of their relationship to forms of knowledge drawn from school and their field practice. Two groups among others are examined: clinical and militant social workers. The first group, almost exclusively made up of women, has had a short brush with university studies. These workers negate the technical knowledge conveyed by the social work schools, value reflection, and more still introspection, beyond what is asked for by users and psychology. They refer to the psychologists with whom they work and give primacy to supervision and short training sessions. The second group comes from the militant world (parties, unions, associations), and have often been through shorter and more chaotic schooling. They distrust schools and established knowledge, but value self-learning, which is a characteristic of the universe of militancy.
topic Clinical social workers
Field knowledge
Militant social workers
School knowledge
Social work
Theory/practice
url http://journals.openedition.org/cres/956
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanfrancoisgaspar entreprisedelegitimationetdedelegitimationdessavoirsscolairesetdeterraindansluniversdutravailsocial
_version_ 1725815105000570880