Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality

Abstract ‘Assumptions are made and most assumptions are wrong’ (Albert Einstein) Clinical trial conduct must be consistent with trial design, yet conducting the trial according to plan remains a major challenge. We discuss the importance of optimal co-applicant team formation in trial leadership, ap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanna Kelly, Barry Hounsome, Gill Lambert, Caroline Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3516-z
id doaj-85ad473f855f4887ac388ba7fe86fed3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85ad473f855f4887ac388ba7fe86fed32020-11-25T03:10:05ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-07-012011910.1186/s13063-019-3516-zEnsuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of qualityJoanna Kelly0Barry Hounsome1Gill Lambert2Caroline Murphy3Kings College London Clinical Trials Unit, Research Management and Innovation Directorate, King’s College LondonKings College London Clinical Trials Unit, Research Management and Innovation Directorate, King’s College LondonKings College London Clinical Trials Unit, Research Management and Innovation Directorate, King’s College LondonKings College London Clinical Trials Unit, Research Management and Innovation Directorate, King’s College LondonAbstract ‘Assumptions are made and most assumptions are wrong’ (Albert Einstein) Clinical trial conduct must be consistent with trial design, yet conducting the trial according to plan remains a major challenge. We discuss the importance of optimal co-applicant team formation in trial leadership, appropriate delegation of tasks and staff supervision arrangements. Finally, we discuss five standard documents which we believe require particular attention. With appropriate engagement by or with co-applicants during the preparation of these five standard documents, we believe many of the pitfalls trials commonly experience can be avoided. The risks inherent in failing to identify and address mistaken assumptions during the preparation of these documents are discussed and recommendations for best practice suggested.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3516-zTrial designAssumptionsLeadershipSupervisionDelegationProtocol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joanna Kelly
Barry Hounsome
Gill Lambert
Caroline Murphy
spellingShingle Joanna Kelly
Barry Hounsome
Gill Lambert
Caroline Murphy
Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
Trials
Trial design
Assumptions
Leadership
Supervision
Delegation
Protocol
author_facet Joanna Kelly
Barry Hounsome
Gill Lambert
Caroline Murphy
author_sort Joanna Kelly
title Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
title_short Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
title_full Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
title_fullStr Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
title_full_unstemmed Ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
title_sort ensuring trial conduct is consistent with trial design: assumption is the enemy of quality
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract ‘Assumptions are made and most assumptions are wrong’ (Albert Einstein) Clinical trial conduct must be consistent with trial design, yet conducting the trial according to plan remains a major challenge. We discuss the importance of optimal co-applicant team formation in trial leadership, appropriate delegation of tasks and staff supervision arrangements. Finally, we discuss five standard documents which we believe require particular attention. With appropriate engagement by or with co-applicants during the preparation of these five standard documents, we believe many of the pitfalls trials commonly experience can be avoided. The risks inherent in failing to identify and address mistaken assumptions during the preparation of these documents are discussed and recommendations for best practice suggested.
topic Trial design
Assumptions
Leadership
Supervision
Delegation
Protocol
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3516-z
work_keys_str_mv AT joannakelly ensuringtrialconductisconsistentwithtrialdesignassumptionistheenemyofquality
AT barryhounsome ensuringtrialconductisconsistentwithtrialdesignassumptionistheenemyofquality
AT gilllambert ensuringtrialconductisconsistentwithtrialdesignassumptionistheenemyofquality
AT carolinemurphy ensuringtrialconductisconsistentwithtrialdesignassumptionistheenemyofquality
_version_ 1724660700412903424