An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018
Abstract Introduction Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of He...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 |
id |
doaj-85a7d6d5801f475f9ac367a6fc8905f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kate Bishop Meredith McMorrow Susan Meiring Sibongile Walaza Liza Rossi Sarona Mhlanga Stefano Tempia Azwifarwi Mathunjwa Jackie Kleynhans Grace D. Appiah Johanna M. McAnerney Heather J. Zar Cheryl Cohen |
spellingShingle |
Kate Bishop Meredith McMorrow Susan Meiring Sibongile Walaza Liza Rossi Sarona Mhlanga Stefano Tempia Azwifarwi Mathunjwa Jackie Kleynhans Grace D. Appiah Johanna M. McAnerney Heather J. Zar Cheryl Cohen An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 BMC Health Services Research Influenza vaccines Pregnant women, South Africa Vaccination |
author_facet |
Kate Bishop Meredith McMorrow Susan Meiring Sibongile Walaza Liza Rossi Sarona Mhlanga Stefano Tempia Azwifarwi Mathunjwa Jackie Kleynhans Grace D. Appiah Johanna M. McAnerney Heather J. Zar Cheryl Cohen |
author_sort |
Kate Bishop |
title |
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_short |
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_full |
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_fullStr |
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018 |
title_sort |
evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of south africa, 2015 – 2018 |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. Methods From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. Results We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). Conclusion Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign. |
topic |
Influenza vaccines Pregnant women, South Africa Vaccination |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katebishop anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT meredithmcmorrow anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT susanmeiring anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT sibongilewalaza anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT lizarossi anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT saronamhlanga anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT stefanotempia anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT azwifarwimathunjwa anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT jackiekleynhans anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT gracedappiah anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT johannammcanerney anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT heatherjzar anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT cherylcohen anevaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT katebishop evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT meredithmcmorrow evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT susanmeiring evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT sibongilewalaza evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT lizarossi evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT saronamhlanga evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT stefanotempia evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT azwifarwimathunjwa evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT jackiekleynhans evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT gracedappiah evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT johannammcanerney evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT heatherjzar evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 AT cherylcohen evaluationofaninfluenzavaccinationcampaigntargetingpregnantwomenin27clinicsintwoprovincesofsouthafrica20152018 |
_version_ |
1717755975761395712 |
spelling |
doaj-85a7d6d5801f475f9ac367a6fc8905f02021-09-12T11:08:26ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-09-012111810.1186/s12913-021-06962-8An evaluation of an influenza vaccination campaign targeting pregnant women in 27 clinics in two provinces of South Africa, 2015 – 2018Kate Bishop0Meredith McMorrow1Susan Meiring2Sibongile Walaza3Liza Rossi4Sarona Mhlanga5Stefano Tempia6Azwifarwi Mathunjwa7Jackie Kleynhans8Grace D. Appiah9Johanna M. McAnerney10Heather J. Zar11Cheryl Cohen12Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionDivision of Public Health Services and Response, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCentre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, and SA-MRC Unit on Child & Adolescent Health, University of Cape TownCentre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS)Abstract Introduction Despite prioritization, routine antenatal influenza vaccine coverage is < 16% in South Africa. We aimed to describe maternal influenza vaccine coverage in 27 antenatal clinics (ANCs) in Gauteng and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, where in collaboration with the Department of Health (DoH), we augmented the annual influenza vaccination programme among pregnant women. Methods From 2015 through 2018, 40,230 additional doses of influenza vaccine were added to the available stock and administered as part of routine antenatal care. Educational talks were given daily and data were collected on women attending ANCs. We compared characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated women using multivariable logistic regression. Results We screened 62,979 pregnant women during the period when Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccines were available (27,068 in Gauteng and 35,911 in WC). Vaccine coverage at the targeted clinics was 78.7% (49,355/62682), although pregnant women in WC were more likely to be vaccinated compared to those in the Gauteng (Odds ratio (OR) =3.7 p < 0.001). Women aged 25—29 and > 35 years were less likely to be vaccinated than women aged 18—24 years (OR = 0.9 p = 0.053; OR = 0.9 p < 0.001). HIV positive status was not associated with vaccination (OR = 1.0 p = 0.266). Reasons for not vaccinating included: vaccine stock-outs where ANCs depleted available stock of vaccines and/or were awaiting delivery of vaccines (54.6%, 6949/12723), refusal/indecision (25.8%, 3285), and current illness that contraindicated vaccination (19.6%, 2489). Conclusion Antenatal vaccination uptake was likely improved by the increased vaccine supply and vaccine education offered during our campaign.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06962-8Influenza vaccinesPregnant women, South AfricaVaccination |