Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies

With BECK's (1986) thesis of a new thrust of individualization a discussion on processes of social change in post-WW II-Germany has been unfolding since the 1980s. The occasionally indistinct terminology and its varied usages have repeatedly led to misunderstandings. A central problem lies in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jens O. Zinn
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2002-01-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/887
id doaj-85a57ee41231438184afc30e358ebdef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85a57ee41231438184afc30e358ebdef2020-11-24T22:56:06ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272002-01-0131874Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern SocietiesJens O. Zinn0University of MelbourneWith BECK's (1986) thesis of a new thrust of individualization a discussion on processes of social change in post-WW II-Germany has been unfolding since the 1980s. The occasionally indistinct terminology and its varied usages have repeatedly led to misunderstandings. A central problem lies in the explicit or implicit assumptions: i.e., on how the consequences of action are related to the meaning ascribed to them and on the relationship of social structure to institutions and social agents. Since these assumptions address the core of the individualization theory they themselves must be subjected to empirical analysis instead of simply being taken for granted. This weakness is connected to the established research traditions in post-WW II-Germany (such as in social structure analysis, biography research and discourse analysis). Each of the different research paradigms, on its own, permits only very limited statements on the processes of individualization. This contribution shows how strategies combining qualitative and quantitative data and methods can be used to examine processes of social change as well as the thesis of societal individualization. Starting from the differentiation between institutional and personal individualization (ZINN 2001), an empirical research design for examining subjective individualization processes will be presented. Here, the combination of qualitative and quantitative data and methods is of special importance. Using an example from life course research, it will be shown how with sampling, type formation, standardized data collection and cluster-analytical reproduction of a typology a qualitative and a quantitative research approach can be combined and how they can benefit each other. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs020171http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/887combination of methodssocial changeindividualizationtype formationsamplingcluster analysislife course researchbiography research
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jens O. Zinn
spellingShingle Jens O. Zinn
Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
combination of methods
social change
individualization
type formation
sampling
cluster analysis
life course research
biography research
author_facet Jens O. Zinn
author_sort Jens O. Zinn
title Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
title_short Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
title_full Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
title_fullStr Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
title_full_unstemmed Strategies and Concepts to Aid Analysis of Individualization in Modern Societies
title_sort strategies and concepts to aid analysis of individualization in modern societies
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2002-01-01
description With BECK's (1986) thesis of a new thrust of individualization a discussion on processes of social change in post-WW II-Germany has been unfolding since the 1980s. The occasionally indistinct terminology and its varied usages have repeatedly led to misunderstandings. A central problem lies in the explicit or implicit assumptions: i.e., on how the consequences of action are related to the meaning ascribed to them and on the relationship of social structure to institutions and social agents. Since these assumptions address the core of the individualization theory they themselves must be subjected to empirical analysis instead of simply being taken for granted. This weakness is connected to the established research traditions in post-WW II-Germany (such as in social structure analysis, biography research and discourse analysis). Each of the different research paradigms, on its own, permits only very limited statements on the processes of individualization. This contribution shows how strategies combining qualitative and quantitative data and methods can be used to examine processes of social change as well as the thesis of societal individualization. Starting from the differentiation between institutional and personal individualization (ZINN 2001), an empirical research design for examining subjective individualization processes will be presented. Here, the combination of qualitative and quantitative data and methods is of special importance. Using an example from life course research, it will be shown how with sampling, type formation, standardized data collection and cluster-analytical reproduction of a typology a qualitative and a quantitative research approach can be combined and how they can benefit each other. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs020171
topic combination of methods
social change
individualization
type formation
sampling
cluster analysis
life course research
biography research
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/887
work_keys_str_mv AT jensozinn strategiesandconceptstoaidanalysisofindividualizationinmodernsocieties
_version_ 1725654832474226688