Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future?
The article analyzes the interpretation of the future, in which the person either does not have a place or is expected by a sad fate. Other past religious interpretations of the future are also being con-sidered. The problem arose only in the culture of the new time, when faith and reason were contr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Философия и космология |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2018-21/Rozin_PhC_vol_21_2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-859958ebfb26482db5ece680a234258c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-859958ebfb26482db5ece680a234258c2021-08-02T11:07:55ZengInternational Society of Philosophy and CosmologyФилософия и космология2307-37052518-18662018-10-01213241Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future?Vadim M. Rozin0Institute of Philosophy RAS (Moscow, Russia)The article analyzes the interpretation of the future, in which the person either does not have a place or is expected by a sad fate. Other past religious interpretations of the future are also being con-sidered. The problem arose only in the culture of the new time, when faith and reason were contrasted and understood as opposing realities, and the universe was interpreted in the spirit of natural sciences, that is, as a physical reality. There were various paradoxes. A vivid example of such paradoxes the author sees in the works of Vadim Kazyutinsky, who studied the concepts of the universe and galaxies. In particular, his research allows us to assert that cosmology by basic parameters should be attributed to a scientific discipline of the humanitarian type, which does not exclude the presence in it of various physical and other natural sciences disciplines. The position of the well-known Russian philosopher Alexey Losev, who points to the boundaries of explanation in the spirit of the natural sciences, is also analyzed. In the second half of the article, alternative scenarios (Vadim Kazyutinsky, Hannah Arendt and the author) are discussed to overcome the pessimistic understanding of the future. For the author it is humanitarian nature of philosophy. For Kazyutinsky, the worldview that the Stoics professed, as well as faith man and humanity. For Hannah Arendt — the clarification of the crisis of our thought and civilization. The conclusion is drawn that the considered vision of reality, characteristic of rationalism and natural sciences, is an alternative, and not one.http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2018-21/Rozin_PhC_vol_21_2018.pdffuturemanuniversegalaxiesscenariosalternative |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vadim M. Rozin |
spellingShingle |
Vadim M. Rozin Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? Философия и космология future man universe galaxies scenarios alternative |
author_facet |
Vadim M. Rozin |
author_sort |
Vadim M. Rozin |
title |
Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? |
title_short |
Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? |
title_full |
Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? |
title_fullStr |
Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are We Really Going to Have an Eschatological Future? |
title_sort |
are we really going to have an eschatological future? |
publisher |
International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology |
series |
Философия и космология |
issn |
2307-3705 2518-1866 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
The article analyzes the interpretation of the future, in which the person either does not have a place or is expected by a sad fate. Other past religious interpretations of the future are also being con-sidered. The problem arose only in the culture of the new time, when faith and reason were contrasted and understood as opposing realities, and the universe was interpreted in the spirit of natural sciences, that is, as a physical reality. There were various paradoxes. A vivid example of such paradoxes the author sees in the works of Vadim Kazyutinsky, who studied the concepts of the universe and galaxies. In particular, his research allows us to assert that cosmology by basic parameters should be attributed to a scientific discipline of the humanitarian type, which does not exclude the presence in it of various physical and other natural sciences disciplines. The position of the well-known Russian philosopher Alexey Losev, who points to the boundaries of explanation in the spirit of the natural sciences, is also analyzed. In the second half of the article, alternative scenarios (Vadim Kazyutinsky, Hannah Arendt and the author) are discussed to overcome the pessimistic understanding of the future. For the author it is humanitarian nature of philosophy. For Kazyutinsky, the worldview that the Stoics professed, as well as faith man and humanity. For Hannah Arendt — the clarification of the crisis of our thought and civilization. The conclusion is drawn that the considered vision of reality, characteristic of rationalism and natural sciences, is an alternative, and not one. |
topic |
future man universe galaxies scenarios alternative |
url |
http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2018-21/Rozin_PhC_vol_21_2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vadimmrozin arewereallygoingtohaveaneschatologicalfuture |
_version_ |
1721233481938239488 |