Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing

A critical challenge underpinning the adoption of Additive Manufacture (AM) as a technology is the postprocessing of manufactured components. For Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), this can involve the removal of powder from the interior of the component, often by vibrating the component to fluidise the powde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Roberts, Recep Kahraman, Desi Bacheva, Gavin Tabor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/5/3/86
id doaj-8594ab25239c4c46afa11cbca8474f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8594ab25239c4c46afa11cbca8474f3a2021-09-26T00:29:56ZengMDPI AGJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2504-44942021-08-015868610.3390/jmmp5030086Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture PostprocessingAndrew Roberts0Recep Kahraman1Desi Bacheva2Gavin Tabor3College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QF, UKHiETA Technologies Ltd., Bristol and Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent, Emersons Green, Bristol BS16 7FR, UKHiETA Technologies Ltd., Bristol and Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent, Emersons Green, Bristol BS16 7FR, UKCollege of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QF, UKA critical challenge underpinning the adoption of Additive Manufacture (AM) as a technology is the postprocessing of manufactured components. For Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), this can involve the removal of powder from the interior of the component, often by vibrating the component to fluidise the powder to encourage drainage. In this paper, we develop and validate a computational model of the flow of metal powder suitable for predicting powder removal from such AM components. The model is a continuum Eulerian multiphase model of the powder including models for the granular temperature; the effect of vibration can be included through appropriate wall boundaries for this granular temperature. We validate the individual sub-models appropriate for AM metal powders by comparison with in-house and literature experimental results, and then apply the full model to a more complex geometry typical of an AM Heat Exchanger. The model is shown to provide valuable and accurate results at a fraction of the computational cost of a particle-based model.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/5/3/86Powder Bed Fusionmetal powder manufacturingpost processingEulerian modelComputational Fluid Dynamicsgranular flow
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Roberts
Recep Kahraman
Desi Bacheva
Gavin Tabor
spellingShingle Andrew Roberts
Recep Kahraman
Desi Bacheva
Gavin Tabor
Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Powder Bed Fusion
metal powder manufacturing
post processing
Eulerian model
Computational Fluid Dynamics
granular flow
author_facet Andrew Roberts
Recep Kahraman
Desi Bacheva
Gavin Tabor
author_sort Andrew Roberts
title Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
title_short Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
title_full Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
title_fullStr Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of Powder Removal for Additive Manufacture Postprocessing
title_sort modelling of powder removal for additive manufacture postprocessing
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
issn 2504-4494
publishDate 2021-08-01
description A critical challenge underpinning the adoption of Additive Manufacture (AM) as a technology is the postprocessing of manufactured components. For Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), this can involve the removal of powder from the interior of the component, often by vibrating the component to fluidise the powder to encourage drainage. In this paper, we develop and validate a computational model of the flow of metal powder suitable for predicting powder removal from such AM components. The model is a continuum Eulerian multiphase model of the powder including models for the granular temperature; the effect of vibration can be included through appropriate wall boundaries for this granular temperature. We validate the individual sub-models appropriate for AM metal powders by comparison with in-house and literature experimental results, and then apply the full model to a more complex geometry typical of an AM Heat Exchanger. The model is shown to provide valuable and accurate results at a fraction of the computational cost of a particle-based model.
topic Powder Bed Fusion
metal powder manufacturing
post processing
Eulerian model
Computational Fluid Dynamics
granular flow
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-4494/5/3/86
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewroberts modellingofpowderremovalforadditivemanufacturepostprocessing
AT recepkahraman modellingofpowderremovalforadditivemanufacturepostprocessing
AT desibacheva modellingofpowderremovalforadditivemanufacturepostprocessing
AT gavintabor modellingofpowderremovalforadditivemanufacturepostprocessing
_version_ 1717365989962678272