Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.

Cancer is driven by somatic mutations that result in a cellular fitness advantage. This selective advantage is expected to be counterbalanced by the immune system when these driver mutations simultaneously lead to the generation of neoantigens, novel peptides that are presented at the cancer cell me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arne Claeys, Tom Luijts, Kathleen Marchal, Jimmy Van den Eynden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-02-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009368
id doaj-85862e2cdff7430aa44e5c4825b6ffb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-85862e2cdff7430aa44e5c4825b6ffb22021-06-25T04:30:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042021-02-01172e100936810.1371/journal.pgen.1009368Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.Arne ClaeysTom LuijtsKathleen MarchalJimmy Van den EyndenCancer is driven by somatic mutations that result in a cellular fitness advantage. This selective advantage is expected to be counterbalanced by the immune system when these driver mutations simultaneously lead to the generation of neoantigens, novel peptides that are presented at the cancer cell membrane via HLA molecules from the MHC complex. The presentability of these peptides is determined by a patient's MHC genotype and it has been suggested that this results in MHC genotype-specific restrictions of the oncogenic mutational landscape. Here, we generated a set of virtual patients, each with an identical and prototypical MHC genotype, and show that the earlier reported HLA affinity differences between observed and unobserved mutations are unrelated to MHC genotype variation. We demonstrate how these differences are secondary to high frequencies of 13 hot spot driver mutations in 6 different genes. Several oncogenic mechanisms were identified that lower the peptides' HLA affinity, including phospho-mimicking substitutions in BRAF, destabilizing tyrosine mutations in TP53 and glycine-rich mutational contexts in the GTP-binding KRAS domain. In line with our earlier findings, our results emphasize that HLA affinity predictions are easily misinterpreted when studying immunogenic selection processes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009368
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arne Claeys
Tom Luijts
Kathleen Marchal
Jimmy Van den Eynden
spellingShingle Arne Claeys
Tom Luijts
Kathleen Marchal
Jimmy Van den Eynden
Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Arne Claeys
Tom Luijts
Kathleen Marchal
Jimmy Van den Eynden
author_sort Arne Claeys
title Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
title_short Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
title_full Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
title_fullStr Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
title_full_unstemmed Low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
title_sort low immunogenicity of common cancer hot spot mutations resulting in false immunogenic selection signals.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Cancer is driven by somatic mutations that result in a cellular fitness advantage. This selective advantage is expected to be counterbalanced by the immune system when these driver mutations simultaneously lead to the generation of neoantigens, novel peptides that are presented at the cancer cell membrane via HLA molecules from the MHC complex. The presentability of these peptides is determined by a patient's MHC genotype and it has been suggested that this results in MHC genotype-specific restrictions of the oncogenic mutational landscape. Here, we generated a set of virtual patients, each with an identical and prototypical MHC genotype, and show that the earlier reported HLA affinity differences between observed and unobserved mutations are unrelated to MHC genotype variation. We demonstrate how these differences are secondary to high frequencies of 13 hot spot driver mutations in 6 different genes. Several oncogenic mechanisms were identified that lower the peptides' HLA affinity, including phospho-mimicking substitutions in BRAF, destabilizing tyrosine mutations in TP53 and glycine-rich mutational contexts in the GTP-binding KRAS domain. In line with our earlier findings, our results emphasize that HLA affinity predictions are easily misinterpreted when studying immunogenic selection processes.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009368
work_keys_str_mv AT arneclaeys lowimmunogenicityofcommoncancerhotspotmutationsresultinginfalseimmunogenicselectionsignals
AT tomluijts lowimmunogenicityofcommoncancerhotspotmutationsresultinginfalseimmunogenicselectionsignals
AT kathleenmarchal lowimmunogenicityofcommoncancerhotspotmutationsresultinginfalseimmunogenicselectionsignals
AT jimmyvandeneynden lowimmunogenicityofcommoncancerhotspotmutationsresultinginfalseimmunogenicselectionsignals
_version_ 1721360875378442240